It Takes two to Tango: Relating Group Identity to Individual Identity Within the Framework of Group Development

Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Processes

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 461-481

  Worchel, Stephen ^a   Coutant, Dawna ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Cognitive representation; Group development; Group research; Organizational psychology; Social psychology

Indexed keywords

EID: 84954190875     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9780470998458.ch19     Document Type: Chapter

References (72)

1. Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (1998). Prospects for research in group processes and intergroup relations. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 1, 7-20.
2. Allport, F. H. (1924). Social psychology. Cambridge, MA: Riverside Press.
3. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
4. Bagby, R. M., & Rector, N. A. (1992). Prejudice in a simulated legal context: A further applica- tion of social identity theory. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 397-406.
5. Bar-Tal, D. (1990). Group beliefs. New York: Springer-Verlag.
6. Bourhis, R. Y., Sachdev, I., & Gagnon, A. (1994). Intergroup research with the Tajfel matrices: Methodological notes. In M. Zanna & J. Olson (Eds.), The social psychology of prejudice: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 7, pp. 209-232). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Brewer, M. (1979). The role of ethnocentrism in intergroup confict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
8. Brewer, M. B. (1993). Social identity, distinctiveness, and ingroup homogeneity. Social Cognition, 11, 150-164.
9. Brewer, M. B., & Miller, N. (1984). Beyond the contact hypothesis: theoretical perspectives on desegregation. In N. Miller & M. Brewer (Eds.), Groups in contact: The psychology of desegrega- tion (pp. 281-302). New York: Academic Press.
10. Clark, R., & Maass, A. (1988). Social categorization in minority influence: The case of homosex- uality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 347-364.
11. Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human order and social order. New York: Scribner.
12. Doise, W. (1998). Social representations in personal identity. In S. Worchel, J. Morales, D. Páez, & J.-C. Deschamps (Eds.), Social identity: International perspectives. London: Sage.
13. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
14. Fiedler, F. E. (1978). Recent developments in research on the contingency model. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Group processes (pp. 209-225). New York: Academic Press.
15. Fiske, S. (1999). (Dis)respecting versus (dis)liking: Ambivalent stereotypes. Paper presented at New England Social Psychology Association, Dartmouth, NH: October.
16. Goethals, G. R., & Darley, J. M. (1987). Social comparison theory: Self-evaluation and group life. In B. Mullen & G. R. Goethals (Eds.), Theories of group behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag.
17. Hartstone, M., & Augoustinos, M. (1995). The minimal group paradigm: Categorization into two versus three groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 179-193.
18. Huddy, L., & Virtanen, S. (1995). Subgroup differentiation and subgroup bias among Latinos as a function of familiarity and positive distinctiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 97-108.
19. Haslam, S. A., Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., McGarty, C., & Hayes, B. K. (1992). Context depen- dent variation in social stereotyping: The effects of intergroup relations as mediated by social change and frame of reference. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 3-20.
20. Hinkle, S., & Brown, R. J. (1990). Intergroup comparisons and social identity: Some links and lacunae. In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances (pp. 48-70). New York: Springer-Verlag.
21. Hogg, M. A. (2000). Subjective uncertainty reduction through self-categorization: A motivational theory of social identity processes. European Review of Social Psychology, 12.
22. Hogg, M. A. (in press). Social identity and social comparison. In J. Suls & L. Wheeler (Eds.), Handbook of social comparison: Theory and research. New York: Plenum.
23. Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1988). Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. London: Routledge.
24. Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1990). Social motivation, self-esteem, and social identity. In D. Abrams & M. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances (pp. 28-47). New York: Springer-Verlag.
25. Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1993). Toward a single process-uncertainty reduction model of social motivation in groups. In M. Hogg & D. Abrams (Eds.), Group motivation: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 173-190). New York: Springer-Verlag.
26. Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1999). Social identity and social cognition: Historical background and current trends. In D. Abrams & M. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity and social cognition (pp. 1-25). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
27. Janis, I. (1982). Groupthink (2nd Ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Miffin.
28. LaCoursiere, R. B. (1980). The life cycle of groups. New York: Human Sciences Press.
29. Le Bon, G. (1895/1960). The crowd (translation of Psychologie des foules). New York: The Viking Press.
30. Long, M. K., & Spears, R. (1997). The self-esteem hypothesis revisited: Differentiation and the disaffected. In R. Spears, P. Oakes, N. Ellemers, & S. Haslam (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 296-317). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
31. Luhtanen, R., & Crocker, J. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one's social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 302-318.
32. Moreland, R. L., Hogg, M., & Hains, S. (1994). Back to the future: Social psychological research on groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 527-555.
33. Moreland, R. L., & Levine, J. M. (1982). Socialization in small groups: Temporal changes in indi- vidual group relations. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 15). New York: Academic Press.
34. Moreland, R. L., & Levine, J. M. (1984). Role transitions in small groups. In V. L. Allen & E. van de Vliert (Eds.), Role transitions: Explorations and explanations (pp. 181-195). New York: Plenum.
35. Moscovici, S., & Nemeth, C. (1974). Social influence II: Minority influence. In C. Nemeth (Ed.), Social psychology: Classic and contemporary integrations. Chicago, IL: Rand-McNally.
36. Mullen, B. (1987). Self-attention theory: The effects of group composition on the individual. In B. Mullen & G. R. Goethals (Eds.), Theories of group behavior (pp. 125-146). New York: Springer-Verlag.
37. Mullen, B., Brown, R., & Smith, C. (1992). Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 103-122.
38. Ng, S. H. (1989). Intergroup behaviour and the self. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 18, 1-12.
39. Park, B., & Rothbart, M. (1982). Perception of outgroup homogeneity and levels of social cate- gorization: Memory for the subordinate attributes of ingroup and outgroup members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(6), 1051-1068.
40. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123-205). New York: Academic Press.
41. Rothgerber, H. (1997). External intergroup threat as an antecedent to perceptions of ingroup and outgroup homogeneity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1206-1221.
42. Rothgerber, H., & Worchel, S. (1997). The view from below: Intergroup relations from the per- spective of the disadvantaged group. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1191-1203.
43. Rubin, M., & Hewstone, M. (1998). Social identity theory's self-esteem hypothesis: A review and some suggestions for clarification. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 40-62.
44. Shaw, M. E. (1981). Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.
45. Sheeran, P., Abrams, D., & Orbell, S. (1995). Unemployment, self-esteem, and depression: A social comparison theory approach. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 65-82.
46. Spears, R., Oakes, P., Ellemers, N., & Haslam, S. (Eds.) (1997). The social psychology of stereo- typing and group life. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
47. Steiner, I. D. (1974). Whatever happened to the group in social psychology? Journal of Experi- mental Social Psychology, 10, 94-108.
48. Suls, J., & Wills, T. A. (Eds.) (1990). Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research. Hills- dale, NJ: Erlbaum.
49. Tajfel, H. (1970). Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American, 223, 96-102.
50. Tajfel, H. (1978). Interindividual behaviors and intergroup behavior. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differen- tiation between small groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 27-60). New York: Academic Press.
51. Tajfel, H. (1982). Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
52. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup confict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
53. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), The psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
54. Tesser, A. (1988). Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 181-227). New York: Academic Press.
55. Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequences in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 384-399.
56. Tuckman, B. W., & Jensen, M. A. C. (1977). Stages of small-group development revisited. Group and Organization Studies, 2, 419-427.
57. Triplett, H. C. (1898). The dynamogenic factors in pacemaking and competition. American Journal of Psychology, 9, 507-533.
58. Turner, J. C. (1982). Toward a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
59. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (Eds.) (1987). Redis- covering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
60. Worchel, S. (1996). Emphasizing the social nature of groups in a developmental framework. In J. L. Nye & A. M. Brower (Eds.), What's social about social cognition? (pp. 261-282) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
61. Worchel, S. (1998). A developmental view of the search for group identity. In S. Worchel, J. Morales, D. Páez, & J. Deschamps (Eds.), International perspectives on social identity. London: Sage.
62. Worchel, S. (1999). Written in blood: Ethnic identity and the struggle for human harmony. New York: Worth.
63. Worchel, S., & Coutant, D. (1997). The tangled web of loyalty: Nationalism, patriotism, and ethnocentrism. In D. Bar-Tal & E. Staub (Eds.), Patriotism in the life of individuals and nations (pp. 190-210). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
64. Worchel, S., Coutant-Sassic, D., & Grossman, M. (1992). A developmental approach to group dynamics: A model and illustrative research. In S. Worchel, W. Wood, & J. Simpson (Eds.), Group process and productivity (pp. 181-202). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
65. Worchel, S., Coutant-Sassic, D., & Wong, F. (1993). Toward a more balanced view of confict: There is a positive side. In S. Worchel & J. A. Simpson (Eds.), ConFict between people and groups. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
66. Worchel, S., Grossman, M., & Coutant, D. (1994). Minority influence in the group context: How group factors affect when the minority will be influential. In S. Moscovici, A. Mucchi-Faina, & A. Maass (Eds.), Minority influence (pp. 97-114). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
67. Worchel, S., Iuzzini, J., Coutant, D., & Ivaldi, M. (2000) A multidimensional model of identity: Relating individual and group identity to intergroup behavior. In R. Brown & D. Capozza (Eds.), Social identity processes: Trends in theory and research. London: Sage.
68. Worchel, S., Jenner, S., & Hebl, M. (1998). Changing of the guard: How origin of the new leader and disposition of the ex-leader affect group performance. Small Group Research, 29, 436-451.
69. Worchel, S., Morales, J. F., Páez, D., & Deschamps, J.-C. (Eds.) (1998). Social identity: interna- tional perspectives. London: Sage.
70. Worchel, S., & Rothgerber, H. (1997). Changing the stereotype of the stereotype. In R. Spears, P. Oakes, N. Ellemers, & S. Haslam (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life: Emphasizing the side of group perceptions (pp. 72-93). London: Sage.
71. Worchel, S., Rothgerber, H., Day, E., Hart, D., & Buttemeyer, J. (1998). Social identity and indi- vidual productivity within groups. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 389-413.
72. Zanna, M., Goethals, G. R., & Hill, J. (1975). Evaluating a sex-rated ability: Social comparison with similar others and standard setters. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 86-93.