Soft hydrogels interpenetrating silicone - A polymer network for drug-releasing medical devices

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials

Volumn 104, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 402-410

  Steffensen, Søren L ^a   Vestergaard, Merete H ^a   Møller, Eva H ^a,c   Groenning, Minna ^a   Alm, Martin ^b   Franzyk, Henrik ^a   Nielsen, Hanne M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b BioModics ApS   (Denmark)

^c NOVO NORDISK A S   (Denmark)

Author keywords

antibacterial; controlled drug delivery; hydrogel; interpenetrating network material; medical device; silicone elastomer

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTICS; BIOMEDICAL EQUIPMENT; CARBON DIOXIDE; CONTROLLED DRUG DELIVERY; DRUG DELIVERY; DRUG PRODUCTS; ELASTOMERS; FUNCTIONAL POLYMERS; HIGH PRESSURE ENGINEERING; INTERPENETRATING POLYMER NETWORKS; MECHANICAL STABILITY; PHEMA; SILICONES;

ANTIBACTERIAL; FUTURE APPLICATIONS; GEL CONCENTRATION; INTERPENETRATING POLYMER NETWORK (IPN); MEDICAL DEVICES; POLY(2-HYDROXYETHYL METHACRYLATE); SILICONE ELASTOMERS; SUSTAINED RELEASE;

HYDROGELS;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CIPROFLOXACIN; DRUG CARRIER; POLYMACON; POLYMER; SILASTIC; WATER; DRUG IMPLANT; HYDROGEL; SILICONE DERIVATIVE;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL GROWTH; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS LINKING; DRUG DELIVERY DEVICE; DRUG RELEASE; HYDROGEL; HYDROPHILICITY; INHIBITION ZONE; KINETICS; RIGIDITY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SIMULATION; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; WATER TRANSPORT; 3T3 CELL LINE; ANIMAL; CHEMISTRY; DRUG IMPLANT; HELA CELL LINE; HUMAN; MOUSE; PHARMACOLOGY;

ANIMALS; CIPROFLOXACIN; DRUG IMPLANTS; HELA CELLS; HUMANS; HYDROGELS; MICE; NIH 3T3 CELLS; POLYHYDROXYETHYL METHACRYLATE; SILICONES;

EID: 84954075145     PISSN: 15524973     EISSN: 15524981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.33371     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Curtis J, Colas A., Medical applications of silicones. In:, Ratner BD, Hoffman AS, Schoen FJ, Lemons JE, editors. Biomaterials Science, 2nd ed. London: Academic Press; 2004. pp 697-707.
2. Klempner D., Interpenetrating polymer networks. Angew Chem Int Ed 1978; 17: 97-106.
3. Lipatov YS, Alekseeva TT., Phase-separated interpenetrating polymer networks. Berlin: Springer Verlag; 2007. pp 1-227.
4. Sperling LH., Interpenetrating polymer networks. In: Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Technology. New York: John Wiley; 2002.
5. Hoare TR, Kohane DS., Hydrogels in drug delivery: Progress and challenges. Polymer 2008; 49: 1993-2007.
6. Roorda WE, Boddé HE, De Boer AG, Junginger HE., Synthetic hydrogels as drug delivery systems. Pharmaceutisch Weekblad Scientific Edition 1986; 8: 165 -1 89.
7. Peppas NA, Hilt JZ, Khademhosseini A, Langer R., Hydrogels in biology and medicine: From molecular principles to bionanotechnology. Adv Mater 2006; 18: 1345-1360.
8. Hoffman AS., Hydrogels for biomedical applications. Ann NY Acad Sci 2001; 944: 62-73.
9. Peppas NA, Bures P, Leobandung W, Ichikawa H., Hydrogels in pharmaceutical formulations. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2000; 50: 27-46.
10. Peppas NA, Khare AR., Preparation, structure and diffusional behavior of hydrogels in controlled release. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 1993; 11: 1-35.
11. Corkhill PH, Hamilton CJ, Tighe BJ., Synthetic hydrogels. VI. Hydrogel composites as wound dressings and implant materials. Biomaterials 1989; 10: 3-10.
12. Mita I, Akiyama S., Molecular design of network polymers. In:, Hatada K, Kitayama T, Vogl O, editors. Macromolecular Design of Polymeric Materials. New York: CRC Press; 1997. pp 393-406.
13. Autian J., Structure-toxicity relationships of acrylic monomers. Environ Health Perspect 1975; 11: 141-152.
14. Yoshii E., Cytotoxic effects of acrylates and methacrylates: Relationships of monomer structures and cytotoxicity. J Biomed Mater Res 1997; 37: 517-524.
15. Bilia A, Carelli V, Di Colo G, Nannipieri E., In vitro evaluation of a pH-sensitive hydrogel for control of GI drug delivery from silicone-based matrices. Int J Pharm 1996; 130: 83-92.
16. Katono H, Maruyama A, Sanui K, Ogata N, Okano T, Sakurai Y., Thermo-responsive swelling and drug release switching of interpenetrating polymer networks composed of poly(acrylamide-co-butyl methacrylate) and poly (acrylic acid). J Control Release 1991; 16: 215-227.
17. Zhang JT, Huang SW, Cheng SX, Zhuo RX., Preparation and properties of poly (N-isopropylacrylamide)/poly (N-isopropylacrylamide) interpenetrating polymer networks for drug delivery. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 2004; 42: 1249-1254.
18. Zhang X-Z, Wu D-Q, Chu C-C., Synthesis, characterization and controlled drug release of thermosensitive IPN-PNIPAAm hydrogels. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 3793-3805.
19. Alm M, Steffensen SL,. A method of producing a delivery device. Patent No.: WO/2013/075724.
20. Kendall JL, Canelas DA, Young JL, DeSimone JM., Polymerizations in supercritical carbon dioxide. Chem Rev 1999; 99: 543-564.
21. Cooper AI., Polymer synthesis and processing using supercritical carbon dioxide. J Mater Chem 2000; 10: 207-234.
22. Johnston KP, da Rocha SRP., Colloids in supercritical fluids over the last 20 years and future directions. J Supercrit Fluid 2009; 47: 523-530.
23. Garg A, Gulari E, Manke CW., Thermodynamics of polymer melts swollen with supercritical gases. Macromolecules 1994; 27: 5643-5653.
24. 2: A novel approach to reaction kinetics using a CSTR. Chem Eng Sci 2000; 55: 5341-5349.
25. Charpentier PA, DeSimone JM, Roberts GW., Continuous precipitation polymerization of vinylidene fluoride in supercritical carbon dioxide: Modeling the rate of polymerization. Ind Eng Chem Res 2000; 39: 4588-4596.
26. Xu WZ, Li X, Charpentier PA., In situ ATR-FT-IR study of the thermal decomposition of diethyl peroxydicarbonate in supercritical carbon dioxide. Polymer 2007; 48: 1219-1228.
27. Abbasi F, Mirzadeh H., Properties of poly (dimethylsiloxane)/hydrogel multicomponent systems. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 2003; 41: 2145-2156.
28. Pajander J, van Veen B, Korhonen O, Lappalainen R, Ketolainen J., Liquid boundary movements in cylindrical and convex hydrophobic matrix tablets: Effects on tablet cracking and drug release. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2006; 64: 167 -1 72.
29. Cory AH, Owen TC, Barltrop JA, Cory JG., Use of an aqueous soluble tetrazolium/formazan assay for cell growth assays in culture. Cancer Commun 1991; 3: 207-212.
30. European Committee for Standardization. Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices-Part 5: Tests for In Vitro Cytotoxicity (ISO 10993-5:2009). Brussels: European Committee for Standardization; 2009.
31. Saltzman WM, Langer R., Transport rates of proteins in porous materials with known microgeometry. Biophys J 1989; 55: 163 -1 71.
32. Wyatt TL, Saltzman WM,. Protein delivery from nondegradable polymer matrices. In:, Sanders L, Hendren R, editors. Protein Delivery, Vol. 10. New York: Springer; 1997. pp 119-137.
33. Lednický F, Janatová V, Lopour P., Silicone rubber-hydrogel composites as polymeric biomaterials III. An investigation of phase distribution by scanning electron microscopy. Biomaterials 1991; 12: 848-852.
34. Lopour P, Vondráček P, Janatová V, Šulc J, Vacik J., Silicone rubber-hydrogel composites as polymeric biomaterials II. Hydrophilicity and permeability to water-soluble low-molecular-weight compounds. Biomaterials 1990; 11: 397-402.
35. Gulsen D, Chauhan A., Effect of water content on transparency, swelling, lidocaine diffusion in p-HEMA gels. J Membr Sci 2006; 269: 35-48.
36. Ferreira L, Vidal MM, Gil MH., Evaluation of poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) gels as drug delivery systems at different pH values. Int J Pharm 2000; 194: 169-180.
37. Clarson S, Dodgson K, Semlyen J., Studies of cyclic and linear poly(dimethylsiloxanes): 19. Glass transition temperatures and crystallization behaviour. Polymer 1985; 26: 930-934.
38. Kwok AY, Qiao GG, Solomon DH., Synthetic hydrogels 3. Solvent effects on poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) networks. Polymer 2004; 45: 4017-4027.
39. Abbasi F, Mirzadeh H, Katbab AA., Sequential interpenetrating polymer networks of poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) and polydimethylsiloxane. J Appl Polym Sci 2002; 85: 1825-1831.
40. Alizadeh M, Abbasi F., Silicone-based hydrogels prepared by interpenetrating polymer network synthesis: Swelling properties and confinements effects on the formation kinetics. J Appl Polym Sci 2012; 124: 985-992.
41. Lee W-F, Lin W-J., Preparation and gel properties of poly[hydroxy ethylmethacrylate-co-poly (ethylene glycol) methacrylate] copolymeric hydrogels by photopolymerization. J Polym Res 2002; 9: 23-29.
42. George M, Abraham TE., Polyionic hydrocolloids for the intestinal delivery of protein drugs: Alginate and chitosan-A review. J Control Release 2006; 114: 1-14.
43. Lee HB, Jhon MS, Andrade JD., Nature of water in synthetic hydrogels. I. Dilatometry, specific conductivity, and differential scanning calorimetry of polyhydroxyethyl methacrylate. J Colloid Interface Sci 1975; 51: 225-231.
44. Reid G, Sharma S, Advikolanu K, Tieszer C, Martin RA, Bruce AW., Effects of ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin, and ofloxacin on in vitro adhesion and survival of Pseudomonas aeruginosa AK1 on urinary catheters. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1994; 38: 1490-1495.
45. Muder RR, Brennen C, Rihs JD, Wagener MM, Obman A, Stout JE, Yu VL., Isolation of Staphylococcus aureus from the urinary tract: Association of isolation with symptomatic urinary tract infection and subsequent staphylococcal bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis 2006; 42: 46-50.