Allport's Intergroup Contact Hypothesis: Its History and Influence

On the Nature of Prejudice

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 262-277

  Pettigrew, Thomas F ^a   Tropp, Linda R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b BOSTON COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84953881148     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9780470773963.ch16     Document Type: Chapter

References (67)

1. Allport, G. W. (1954/1979). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.
2. Allport, G. W. (1958). The nature of prejudice. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor Books.
3. Araragi, C. (1983). The effect of the jigsaw learning method on children's academic performance and learning attitude . Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 31, 102-12.
4. Aronson, E. & Gonzalez, A. (1988). Desegregation, jigsaw, and the Mexican-American experience. In P. A. Katz & D. A. Taylor (eds.), Eliminating racism: Profiles in controversy (pp. 301-14). 301.
5. Aronson, E. & Patnoe, S. (1997). The jigsaw classroom: Building cooperation in the classroom (2nd ed.). New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
6. Baker, P. E. (1934). Negro-White adjustment. New York, NY: Association Press.
7. Blair, I. V., Park, B., & Bachelor, J. (2003). Are some people more anxious than others? Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 6, 151-69.
8. Brameld, T. (1946). Minority problems in the public schools. New York: Harper.
9. Brewer, M. B. & Kramer, R. M. (1985). The psychology of intergroup attitudes and behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 36, 219-43.
10. Brewer, M. B. & Miller, N. (1984). Beyond the contact hypothesis: Theoretical perspectives on desegregation. In N. Miller & M. B. Brewer (eds.), Groups in contact: The psychology of desegregation (pp. 281-302). Orlando: Academic Press.
11. Brophy, I. N. (1946). The luxury of anti-Negro prejudice. Public Opinion Quarterly, 9, 456-66.
12. Brown, R. J., Vivian, J., & Hewstone, M. (1999). Changing attitudes through intergroup contact: The effects of group membership salience. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 131-42.
13. Chu, D. & Griffey, D. (1985). The contact theory of racial integration: The case of sport. Sociology of Sport Journal, 2, 323-33.
14. Cohen, E. G. (1982). Expectation states and interracial interaction in school settings. Annual Review of Sociology, 8, 209-35.
15. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Cook, S. W. (1969). Motives in a conceptual analysis of attitude-related behavior. In J. Brigham & T. Weissbach (eds.), Racial attitudes in America: Analyses and findings of social psychology (pp. 250-60). New York: Harper & Row.
17. Corrigan, P., Markowitz, F. E., Watson, A., Rowan, D., & Kubiak, M. A. (2003). An attributional model of public discrimination toward persons with mental illness. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 44, 162-79.
18. Deutsch, M. & Collins, M. (1951). Interracial housing: A psychological evaluation of a social experiment. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
19. Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., & Kawakami, K. (2003). Intergroup contact: The past, present, and the future. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 6(1), 5-21.
20. Eppler, R. & Huber, G. L. (1990). Wissenserwerb im Team: Empirische Untersuchung von Effekten des Gruppen-Puzzles. [Knowledge acquisition in a team: Empirical investigation of the effects of group puzzles.] Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 37, 172-8.
21. Fine, G. A. (1979). The Pinkston settlement: An historical and social psychological investigation of the contact hypothesis. Phylon, 40, 229-42.
22. Foster, D. & Finchilescu, G. (1986). Contact in a "non-contact" society: The case of South Africa. In M. Hewstone & R. Brown (eds.), Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters (pp. 119-36). Oxford: Blackwell.
23. Hebl, M. R. & Kleck, R. E. (2000). The social consequences of physical disability. In T. F. Heatherton, R. E. Kleck, M. R. Hebl, & J. G. Hull (eds.), The social psychology of stigma (pp. 419-39). New York: Guilford.
24. Homans, G. C. (1950). The human group. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
25. Jackson, J. W. (1983). Contact theory of intergroup hostility: A review and evaluation of the theoretical and empirical literature. International Journal of Group Tensions, 23, 43-65.
26. Johnson, B. T. & Eagly, A. H. (2000). Quantitative synthesis of social psychological research. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (eds.), Handbook of research methods in social psychology (pp. 496-528). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Maruyama, G. (1984). Goal interdependence and interpersonal-personal attraction in heterogeneous classrooms: A meta-analysis. In N. Miller & M. B. Brewer (eds.), Groups in contact: The psychology of desegregation (pp. 187-212). Orlando: Academic Press.
28. Kephart, W. M. (1957). Racial factors and urban law enforcement. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
29. Kramer, B. M. (1950). Residential contact as a determinant of attitudes toward Negroes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.
30. Landis, D., Hope, R. O., & Day, H. R. (1984). Training for desegregation in the military. In N. Miller & M. B. Brewer (eds.), Groups in contact: The psychology of desegregation (pp. 258-78). Orlando: Academic Press.
31. Lett, H. A. (1945). Techniques for achieving interracial cooperation. In Proceedings of the Institute on Race Relations and Community Organization. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago and the American Council on Race Relations.
32. Levine, R. A. & Campbell, D. T. (1972). Ethnocentrism: Theories of conflict, ethnic attitudes, and group behavior. New York: John Wiley.
33. MacKenzie, B. K. (1948). The importance of contact in determining attitudes toward Negroes. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 43, 417-41.
34. Mackie, D. M. & Smith, E. R. (eds.) (2002). From prejudice to intergroup emotions: Differentiated reactions to social groups. New York: Psychology Press.
35. Morrison, E. W. & Herlihy, J. M. (1992). Becoming the best place to work: Managing diversity at American Express travel related services. In S. E. Jackson and associates (eds.), Diversity in the workplace: Human resources initiatives (pp. 203-26). New York: Guilford.
36. Nicholson, I. A. M. (2003). Inventing personality: Gordon Allport and the science of selfhood. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
37. Parker, J. H. (1968). The interaction of Negroes and Whites in an integrated church setting. Social Forces, 46, 359-66.
38. Patchen, M. (1982). Black-white contact in schools. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
39. Pettigrew, T. F. (1971). Racially separate or together? New York: McGraw-Hill.
40. Pettigrew, T. F. (1986). The contact hypothesis revisited. In H. Hewstone & R. Brown (eds.), Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters (pp. 169-95). Oxford: Blackwell.
41. Pettigrew, T. F. (1997). Generalized intergroup contact effects on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 173-85.
42. Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65-85.
43. Pettigrew, T. F. & Tropp, L. R. (2000). Does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Recent meta-analytic findings. In S. Oskamp (ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 93-114). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
44. Pettigrew, T. F. & Tropp, L. R. (2004a). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Unpublished manuscript under review, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA.
45. Pettigrew, T. F. & Tropp, L. R. (2004b). Intergroup anxiety as a mediator for contact-prejudice relationships Manuscript in preparation.
46. Riordan, C. (1978). Equal-status interracial contact: A review and revision of the concept. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 2, 161-85.
47. Riordan, C. & Ruggiero, J. (1980). Producing equal-status interracial interaction: A replication. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43, 131-6.
48. Robinson, J. W. & Preston, J. D. (1976). Equal status contact and modification of racial prejudice: A reexamination of the contact hypothesis. Social Forces, 54, 911-24.
49. Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research (rev. ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
50. Schofield, J. W. (1989). Black and White in school: Trust, tension, or tolerance? New York: Teachers College Press.
51. Schofield, J. W. & Eurich-Fulcer, R. (2001). When and how school desegregation improves intergroup relations. In R. Brown & S. L. Gaertner (eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intergroup processes (pp. 475-94). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
52. Sherif, M., Harvey, O. J., White, B. J., Hood, W. R., & Sherif, C. W. (1961). Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The Robbers Cave experiment. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Book Exchange.
53. Sims, V. M. & Patrick, J. R. (1936). Attitude toward the Negro of northern and southern college students. Journal of Social Psychology, 7, 192-204.
54. Slavin, R. E. (1983). Cooperative learning. New York: Longman.
55. Stephan, C. W. & Stephan, W. G. (1992). Reducing intercultural anxiety through intercultural contact. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 16, 89-106.
56. Stephan, W. G. (1987). The contact hypothesis in intergroup relations. In C. Hendrick (ed.), Review of personality and social psychology: Group processes and intergroup relations (vol. 9, pp. 13-40. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
57. Stephan, W. G., Boniecki, K. A., Ybarra, O., Bettencourt, A., Ervin, K. S., Jackson, L. A., McNatt, P. S., & Renfro, C. L. (2002). The role of threats in the racial attitudes of Blacks and Whites. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1242-54.
58. Stouffer, S. A., Schuman, E. A., DeVinney, L. C., Star, S. A., & Williams, R. M., Jr. (1949). The American soldier: Adjustment during army life (vol. 1). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
59. Sumner, W. G. (1906). Folkways. New York: Ginn.
60. Van Dick, R., Wagner, U., Pettigrew, T. F., Christ, O., Wolff, C., Petzel, T., Castro, V., & Jackson, J. S. (in press). The role of perceived importance in intergroup contact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 211-27.
61. Voci, A. & Hewstone, M. (2003). Intergroup contact and prejudice toward immigrants in Italy: The mediational role of anxiety and the moderational role of group salience. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 6, 37-52.
62. Wagner, U. & Machleit, U. (1986). "Gastarbeiter" in the Federal Republic of Germany: Contact between Germans and migrant populations. In M. Hewstone & R. Brown (eds.), Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters (pp. 59-78). Oxford: Blackwell.
63. Walker, I. & Crogan, M. (1998). Academic performance, prejudice, and the jigsaw classroom: New pieces to the puzzle. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 8, 381-93.
64. Williams, R. M., Jr. (1947). The reduction of intergroup tensions. New York: Social Science Research Council.
65. Wilner, D. M, Walkley, R. P., & Cook, S. W. (1955). Human relations in interracial housing: A study of the contact hypothesis. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
66. Works, E. (1961). The prejudiceinteraction hypothesis from the point of view of the Negro minority group. American Journal of Sociology, 67, 47-52.
67. Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, Monograph supplement, no. 2, part 2: 1-27.