Learning by example: Training users with high-quality query suggestions

SIGIR 2015 - Proceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 133-142

  Harvey, Morgan ^a   Hauff, Claudia ^b   Elsweiler, David ^c  

^a NORTHUMBRIA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Behavioural change; Reflection; Search expertise; User study

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; REFLECTION;

BEHAVIOURAL CHANGES; HIGH QUALITY; INTERACTIVE SEARCH; LEARNING BY EXAMPLES; QUERY SUGGESTION; SEARCH EXPERTISE; SEARCH SESSIONS; USER STUDY;

SEARCH ENGINES;

EID: 84953775942     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2766462.2767731     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (44)

1. P. Anick, Using terminological feedback for web search refinement: a log-based study, SIGIR'03, ACM, 2003, pp. 88-95.
2. A. Arampatzis and J. Kamps, A study of query length, SIGIR'08, ACM, 2008, pp. 811-812.
3. A. Aula, N. Jhaveri, and M. Käki, Information search and re-access strategies of experienced web users, WWW'05, ACM, 2005, pp. 583-592.
4. L. Azzopardi, M. De Rijke, and K. Balog, Building simulated queries for known-item topics: an analysis using six european languages, SIGIR'07, ACM, 2007, pp. 455-462.
5. H. Bast and I. Weber, Type less, find more: fast autocompletion search with a succinct index, SIGIR'06, ACM, 2006, pp. 364-371.
6. S. Bateman, J. Teevan, and R. W. White, The search dashboard: how reflection and comparison impact search behavior, SIGCHI, ACM, 2012, pp. 1785-1794.
7. N. J. Belkin, Helping people find what they don't know, Commun. ACM 43(2000), no. 8, 58-61.
8. N. J. Belkin, D. Kelly, G. Kim, J.-Y. Kim, H.-J. Lee, G. Muresan, M.-C. Tang, X.-J. Yuan, and C. Cool, Query length in interactive information retrieval, SIGIR'03, ACM, 2003, pp. 205-212.
9. J. L. Bennett, The user interface in interactive systems, Annual review of information science and technology 7(1972), no. 159-196.
10. W. B. Croft and R. H. Thompson, I3r: A new approach to the design of document retrieval systems, JASIST 38(1987), no. 6, 389-404.
11. Z. Dou, R. Song, and J. Wen, A large-scale evaluation and analysis of personalized search strategies, WWW'07, ACM, 2007, pp. 581-590.
12. D. Elsweiler, Supporting human memory in personal information management, Ph. D. thesis, University of Strathclyde, 2007.
13. B. M. Evans and E. H. Chi, An elaborated model of social search, IP&M 46(2010), no. 6, 656-678.
14. K. Franzen and J. Karlgren, Verbosity and interface design, SICS Research Report (2000).
15. G. W. Furnas, T. K. Landauer, L. M. Gomez, and S. T. Dumais, The vocabulary problem in human-system communication, Communications of the ACM 30(1987), no. 11, 964-971.
16. J. Hackos and J. Redish, User and task analysis for interface design, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1998.
17. D. Harman, Towards interactive query expansion, SIGIR'88, ACM, 1988, pp. 321-331.
18. M. Harvey, F. Crestani, and M. J. Carman, Building user profiles from topic models for personalised search, CIKM'13, ACM, 2013, pp. 2309-2314.
19. A. Hassan, R. Jones, and K. L. Klinkner, Beyond dcg: user behavior as a predictor of a successful search, WSDM, ACM, 2010, pp. 221-230.
20. A. Hassan, R. W. White, S. T Dumais, and Y. Wang, Struggling or exploring?: disambiguating long search sessions, WSDM, ACM, 2014, pp. 53-62.
21. H. A. Hembrooke, L. A. Granka, G. K. Gay, and E. D. Liddy, The effects of expertise and feedback on search term selection and subsequent learning, JASIST 56(2005), no. 8, 861-871.
22. I. Hsieh-Yee, Effects of search experience and subject knowledge on the search tactics of novice and experienced searchers, JASIST 44(1993), 161-174.
23. B. J. Jansen, D. L. Booth, and A. Spink, Patterns of query reformulation during web searching, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60(2009), no. 7, 1358-1371.
24. D. Kelly and X. Fu, Eliciting better information need descriptions from users of information search systems, IP&M 43(2007), no. 1, 30-46.
25. J. Koenemann and N. J. Belkin, A case for interaction: a study of interactive information retrieval behavior and effectiveness, SIGCHI'96, ACM, 1996, pp. 205-212.
26. W. Lucas and H. Topi, Training for web search: Will it get you in shape?, JASIST 55(2004), no. 13, 1183-1198.
27. D. McKay and G. Buchanan, Boxing clever: how searchers use and adapt to a one-box library search, OzCHIÕ13, ACM, 2013, pp. 497-506.
28. N. Moraveji, D. Russell, J. Bien, and D. Mease, Measuring improvement in user search performance resulting from optimal search tips, SIGIR'11, ACM, 2011, pp. 355-364.
29. J. Nielsen, Incompetent research skills curb users' problem solving http://www.useit.com/alertbox/search-skills.html last accessed january, 2015, Alertbox (2011).
30. H. Oinas-Kukkonen and M. Harjumaa, Towards deeper understanding of persuasion in software and information systems, ACHI'08, IEEE, 2008, pp. 200-205.
31. S. E. Robertson, On term selection for query expansion, Journal of Documentation 46(1990), no. 4, 359-364.
32. K. Rodden, I. Ruthven, and R. W. White, Workshop on web information seeking and interaction, ACM SIGIR Forum, vol. 41, ACM, 2007, pp. 63-67.
33. I. Ruthven, Re-examining the potential effectiveness of interactive query expansion.
34. I. Ruthven and M. Lalmas, A survey on the use of relevance feedback for information access systems, The Knowledge Engineering Review 18(2003), no. 02, 95-145.
35. B. Shneiderman, Dynamic queries for visual information seeking, Software, IEEE 11(1994), no. 6, 70-77.
36. B. Smyth, E. Balfe, J. Freyne, P. Briggs, M. Coyle, and O. Boydell, Exploiting query repetition and regularity in an adaptive community-based web search engine, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 14(2004), no. 5, 383-423.
37. E. Sormunen, A method for measuring wide range performance of boolean queries in full-text databases, Tampere University Press, 2000.
38. R. S. Taylor, Question-negotiation and information seeking in libraries, College & Research Libraries 29(1968), no. 3, 178-194.
39. P. Vakkari, Changes in search tactics and relevance judgements when preparing a research proposal a summary of the findings of a longitudinal study, Information Retrieval 4(2001), no. 3-4, 295-310.
40. E. M. Voorhees, The trec 2005 robust track, SIGIR Forum 40(2006), no. 1, 41-48.
41. E. M. Voorhees, D. K. Harman, et al., Trec: Experiment and evaluation in information retrieval, vol. 63, MIT press Cambridge, 2005.
42. R. W. White, S. T. Dumais, and J. Teevan, Characterizing the influence of domain expertise on web search behavior, WSDM'09, ACM, 2009, pp. 132-141.
43. R. W. White and D. Morris, Investigating the querying and browsing behavior of advanced search engine users, SIGIR'07, ACM, 2007, pp. 255-262.
44. P. Willett and I. Ruthven, Relevance behaviour in trec, Journal of Documentation 70(2014), no. 6, 1098-1117.