A revised Durbin-Wu-Hausman test for industrial robot identification

Control Engineering Practice

Volumn 48, Issue , 2016, Pages 52-62

  Janot, Alexandre ^a   Vandanjon, Pierre Olivier ^b   Gautier, Maxime ^c  

^a ONERA   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ GUSTAVE EIFFEL   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE NANTES   (France)

Author keywords

DWH test; Heteroskedasticity; Instrumental variable method; Rigid robot dynamics; Robots identification; Wald statistic

Indexed keywords

DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); ECONOMICS; INDUSTRIAL ROBOTS; INVERSE PROBLEMS; LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; ROBOTS; STATISTICS;

BAND PASS FILTERING; EXCITING TRAJECTORIES; HETEROSKEDASTICITY; IDENTIFICATION METHOD; INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLE METHODS; INVERSE DYNAMIC MODEL; RIGID ROBOTS; WALD STATISTIC;

TESTING;

EID: 84953735441     PISSN: 09670661     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2015.12.017     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Aguero, & Goodwin. (2006). On the optimality of open and closed loop experiments in system identification. In: Proceedings of the 45th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control Conference (pp. 163-168).
2. Aguero and Goodwin Choosing between open- and closed-loop experiments in linear system identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 2007, 52(8):1475-14780.
3. Calanca A., Capisani L.M., Ferrara A., Magnani L. MIMO Closed Loop Identification of an Industrial Robot. IEEE Transactions on Control System Technology 2011, 19(5):1214-1224.
4. Davidson R., MacKinnon J.G. Estimation and inference in econometrics 1993, 1993. Oxford University Press, New York.
5. Dellon B., Matsuoka Y. Modeling and system identification of a life-size brake-actuated manipulator. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 2009, 25(3):481-491.
6. Garnier H., Wang L. Identification of continuous-time models from sampled data 2008, 2008. Springer, New York.
7. Gautier M. Numerical calculation of the base inertial parameters. Journal of Robotics Systems 1991, 8(4):485-506. 1991.
8. Gautier M., Khalil W. Exciting trajectories for the identification of the inertial parameters of robots. International Journal of Robotics Research 1992, 11:362-375.
9. Gautier M., Poignet P. Extended kalman filtering and weighted least-squares dynamic identification of robot. Control Engineering Practice 2001, 9(2001):1361-1372.
10. Gautier M., Janot A., Vandanjon P.O. A new closed-loop output error method for parameter identification of robot dynamics. IEEE Transactions on Control System Technology 2013, 21(2):428-444.
11. Gilson M., Garnier H., Young P.C., Van den Hof P. Optimal instrumental variable method for closed-loop identification. Control Theory & Applications, IET 2011, 5(10):1147-1154.
12. Hausman J.A. Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica 1978, 46(6):1251-1271.
13. Hollerbach J., Khalil W., Gautier M. Model identification, springer handbook of robotics 2008, 2008. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg.
14. Indri M., Calafiore G., Legnani G., Jatta F., & Visioli A. (2002). Optimized dynamic calibration of a SCARA robot. In: Proceedings of the 15th IFAC World Congress, July 2002. Barcelona, Spain.
15. Janot A., Vandanjon P. O. and Gautier M. (2013), A Durbin-Wu-Hausman test for industrial robots identification. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (pp. 2956-2961). Karlsruhe, Germany, May 2013.
16. Janot A., Vandanjon P.O., Gautier M. A generic instrumental variable approach for industrial robots identification. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 2014, 22(1):132-145. January 2014.
17. Janot A., Vandanjon P.O., Gautier M. An instrumental variable approach for rigid industrial robots identification. Control Engineering Practice 2014, 25:85-101. April 2014.
18. Khalil W., Dombre E. Modeling, identification and control of robots 2002, 2002. Hermes Penton, London.
19. Kostic D., de Jager B., Steinbuch M., Hensen R. Modeling and Identification for high-performance robot control: an rrr-robotic arm case study. IEEE Transactions on Control System Technology 2004, 12(6). November 2004.
20. Landau I.D. Identification in closed loop: a powerful design tool (better design models, simpler controllers). Control Engineering Practice 2001, 9:51-65. 2001.
21. Mayeda H., Yoshida K., Osuka K. Base parameters of manipulator dynamic models. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 1990, 6(3):312-321.
22. Olsen M.M., Swevers J., Verdonck W. Maximum likelihood identification of a dynamic robot model: implementation issues. International Journal of Robotics Research 2002, 21(2):89-96.
23. Östring M., Gunnarsson S., Norrlöf M. Closed-loop identification of an industrial robot containing flexibilities. Control Engineering Practice 2003, 11(2003):291-300.
24. Pressé C., & Gautier M. (1993). New criteria of exciting trajectories for robot identification. In: Proceedings of the 1993 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (pp. 907-912). Atlanta, GA, USA.
25. Ramdani N., Poignet P. Robust dynamic experimental identification of robots with set membership uncertainty. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics 2005, 10(2):253-256.
26. Söderström T., Stoica P. System identification 1989, 1989. Prentice Hall International Series in Systems and Control Engineering, Great Britain.
27. Soewandito D.B., Oetomo D., Ang M.H. Neuro-adaptive motion control with velocity observer in operational space formulation. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 2011, 27(4):829-842.
28. Swevers J., Verdonck W., De Schutter J. Dynamic model identification for industrial robots-Integrated experiment design and parameter estimation. IEEE Control Systems Magazine 2007, 27:58-71.
29. Ting J.-A., Mistry M., Peters J., Schaal S., & Nakanishi J. (2006). A bayesian approach to nonlinear parameter identification for rigid body dynamics. In: Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems.
30. Wernholt E., Gunnarsson S. Estimation of nonlinear effects in frequency domain identification of industrial robots. Instrumentation and Measurement, IEEE Transactions on 2008, 57(2008):856-863.
31. White H. A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 1980, 48(4):817-838.
32. Wooldridge J.M. Introductory econometrics: a modern approach 2009, 2009. Cengage Learning Inc. 4th Edition.
33. Xi, F. (May 1995). Effect of non-geometric errors on manipulator inertial calibration. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Robotics and Automation (pp. 1808-1813). Nagoya, Japan.
34. Young P.C. Recursive estimation and time-series analysis: an introduction for the student and practitioner 2011, 2011. Springer Verlag, Berlin. 2nd Edition.