Overcoming consumer inertia to dietary guidance

Advances in Nutrition

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 391-396

  Webb, Densie ^a   Byrd Bredbenner, Carol ^b  

^a Health and Nutrition Communications   (United States)

^b RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Consumer; Dietary guidelines; Health behavior; Health information; Nutrition policy

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; CONSUMER; DIET; EATING; EXPECTATION; HEALTH EDUCATOR; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION; ADOLESCENT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CHILD; CONSUMER ATTITUDE; EXERCISE; FAST FOOD; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FOOD; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH STATUS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; LIFESTYLE; NUTRITION; NUTRITION POLICY; NUTRITIONAL STATUS; PROCEDURES; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TASTE;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; CONSUMER BEHAVIOR; DIET; EXERCISE; FAST FOODS; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FOOD; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; LIFE STYLE; NUTRITION POLICY; NUTRITIONAL PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; NUTRITIONAL STATUS; TASTE;

EID: 84953408841     PISSN: 21618313     EISSN: 21565376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3945/an.115.008441     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. USDA, US Department of Health and Human Services. Dietary guide- lines for Americans. 7th ed. Washington (DC): US Government; 2010.
2. Bier D, Derelian D, German J, Katz D, Pate R, Thompson K. Improving compliance with dietary recommendations. Nutr Today 2008;43:180-7.
3. Kirkpatrick SI, Dodd KW, Reedy J, Krebs-Smith SM. Income and race/- ethnicity are associated with adherence to food-based dietary guidance among US adults and children. J Acad Nutr Diet 2012;112:624-35.e6.
4. Nicklas TA, Jahns L, Bogle ML, Chester DN, Giovanni M, Klurfeld DM, Laugero K, Liu Y, Lopez S, Tucker KL. Barriers and facilitators for con- sumer adherence to the dietary guidelines for Americans: the HEALTH study. J Acad Nutr Diet 2013;113:1317-31.
5. Krebs-Smith SM, Guenther PM, Subar AF, Kirkpatrick SI, Dodd KW. Americans do not meet federal dietary recommendations. J Nutr 2010;140:1832-8.
6. Group NPD. National eating trends. PortWashington (NY): Group NPD; 2011.
7. Rowe S, Alexander N, Almeida N, Black R, Burns R, Bush L, Crawford P, Keim N, Kris-Etherton P, Weaver C. Food science challenge: translat- ing the dietary guidelines for Americans to bring about real behavior change. J Food Sci 2011;76:R29-37.
8. Prochaska J, Redding C, Evers K, editors.The transtheoretical model and stages of change. 4th ed. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass; 2008.
9. US Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy people 2020. Washington (DC): US Government; 2014.
10. Friedl KE, Rowe S, Bellows LL, Johnson SL, Hetherington MM, de Froidmont-Gortz I, Lammens V, Hubbard VS. Report of an EU-US sympo- sium on understanding nutrition-related consumer behavior: strategies to promote a lifetime of healthy food choices. J Nutr Ed Behav 2014;46:445-50.
11. Van Rijnsoever FJ, van Lente H, van Trijp H. Systemic policies towards a healthier and more responsible food system. J Epidemiol Community Health 2011;65:737-9.
12. Ng S, Popkin B. The Healthy Weight Commitment Foundation Pledge. Am J Prev Med 2014;47:520-30.
13. International Food Information Council Foundation. 2012 Food & Health Survey. Washington (DC); 2012.
14. American Dietetic Association. Nutrition and you: trends 2011. Chicago; American Dietetic Association; 2011.
15. Watts ML, Hager MH, Toner CD, Weber JA. The art of translating nutritional science into dietary guidance: history and evolution of the Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Nutr Rev 2011;69:404-12.
16. Nagler RH. Adverse outcomes associated with media exposure to con- tradictory nutrition messages. J Health Commun 2014;19:24-40.
17. Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior. Taking communication of the Dietary Guidelines from (Really) good to great.My Plate 2.0. Portland (OR); Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior; 2013.
18. Fernstrom MH, Reed KA, Rahavi EB, Dooher CC. Communication strategies to help reduce the prevalence of non-communicable diseases: proceedings from the inaugural IFIC Foundation Global Dietary and Physical Activity Communications Summit. Nutr Rev 2012;70:301-10.
19. Quagliani D, Hermann M. Communicating accurate food and nutrit- ion information. Practice paper of the Academy of Nutrition and Die- tetics. J Acad Nutr Diet 2012;112:759-67.
20. USDA [Internet]. Washington (DC): USDA. [cited 2015 May 11]. Available from: www.choosemyplate.gov.
21. Zeng-Treitler Q, Goryachev S, Tse T, Keselman A, Boxwala A. Estimat- ing consumer familiarity with health terminology: a context-based ap- proach. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008;15:349-56.
22. US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Disease Preven- tion and Health Promotion. Quick guide to health literacy. Washington (DC): US Government; undated.
23. International Food Information Council Foundation. Exploratory re- search to understand consumer receptivity to the concept of energy balance. A report to the Dietary Guidelines Alliance. Washington (DC): International Food Information Council Foundation; 2004.
24. Lapka C, Jupka K, Wray R, Jacobsen H. Applying cognitive response testing in message development and pre-testing. Health Educ Res 2008;23:467-76.
25. Maibach E, Parrott R. Design health messages; approaches from com- munication theory and public health practice. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications, Inc.; 1995.
26. Goldberg JP. Nutrition and health communication: the message and the media over half a century. Nutr Rev 1992;50:71-7.
27. FitzgibbonM, Gans K, EvansW, Viswanath K, Johnson-TaylorW, Krebs- Smith S, Rodgers A, Yaroch A. Communicating healthy eating: Lessons learned and future directions. J Nutr Educ Behav 2007;39:S63-71.
28. Advisory Group Convened by Harvard School of Public Health and In- ternational Food Information Council Foundation. Improving public understanding: guidelines for communicating emerging science on nu- trition, food safety, and health. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998;90:194-9.
29. Antman EM, Appel LJ, Balentine D, Johnson RK, Steffen LM, Miller EA, Pappas A, Stitzel KF, Vifiadis DK, Whitsel L. Stakeholder discussion to reduce population-wide sodium intake and decrease sodium in the food supply. A conference report from the American Heart Association Sodium Conference 2013 Planning Group. Circulation 2014;129:e660-79.
30. Maillot M, Monsivais P, Drewnowski A. Food pattern modeling shows that the 2010 Dietary Guidelines for sodium and potassium cannot be met simultaneously. Nutr Res 2013;33:188-94.
31. Drewnowski A. The cost of US foods as related to their nutritive value. Am J Clin Nutr 2010;92:1181-8.
32. Rao M, Afshin A, Singh G, Mozaffarian D. Do healthier foods and diet patterns cost more than less healthy options? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2013;3:e004277.
33. Monsivais P, Aggarwal A, Drewnowski A. Following federal guidelines to increase nutrient consumption may lead to higher food costs for consumers. Health Aff (Millwood) 2011;30:1471-7.
34. Aggarwal A, Monsivais P, Cook AJ, Drewnowski A. Does diet cost me- diate the relation between socioeconomic position and diet quality? Eur J Clin Nutr 2011;65:1059-66.
35. Bernstein AM, Bloom DE, Rosner BA, Franz M, Willett WC. Relation of food cost to healthfulness of diet among US women. Am J Clin Nutr 2010;92:1197-203.
36. Smith LP, Ng SW, Popkin BM. Trends in US home food preparation and consumption: analysis of national nutrition surveys and time use studies from 1965-1966 to 2007-2008. Nutr J 2013;12:45.
37. Hingle M, Nichter M, Mederios M, Grase S. Texting for health: the use of participatory methods to develop healthy lifestyle messages for teens. J Nutr Educ Behav 2013;45:12-9.
38. Martin-Biggers J, Cheng C, Byrd-Bredbenner C. The unseen power of parents: the influence of parent physical activity behaviors and values on preschool children's physical activity, sleep, and screentime. FASEB J 2014;28:1:808.2.
39. Jarratt J, Mahaffie J. The profession of dietetics at a critical juncture: a report on the 2006 environmental scan for the American Dietetic As- sociation. J Am Diet Assoc 2007;107:S39-57.
40. Rowe S, Alexander N, Almeida N, Black R, Burns R, Bush L, Crawford P, Keim N, Kris-Etherton P, Weaver C. Translating the Dietary Guide- lines for Americans 2010 to bring about real behavior change. J Am Diet Assoc 2011;111:26-39.
41. Champion V, Skinner C. The health belief model. In: Glanz K, Rimer B, Viswanath K, editors. Health behavior and health education theory, re- search, and practice. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass; 2008. p. 45-65.
42. Finnegan J, Viswanath K, editors. Communication theory and health behavior change: The media studies framework. 4th ed. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass; 2008.
43. McAlister A, Perry C, Parcel G. How individuals, environments, and health behavior interact; social cognitive theory. In: Glanz K, Rimer B, Viswanath K, editors. Health behavior and health education theory, re- search, and practice. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass; 2008. p. 169-88.
44. Weinstein N, Sandman P, Blalock S, editors. The precaution adoption process model. 4th ed. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass; 2008.
45. Byrd-Bredbenner C, Abbot J, Wheatley V, Schaffner D, Bruhn C, Blalock L. Risky eating behaviors of young adults-implications for food safety education. J Am Diet Assoc 2008;108:549-52.
46. Kapsak WR, Edge M, White C, Childs NM, Geiger CJ. Putting the Di- etary Guidelines for Americans into action: behavior-directed messages to motivate parents-phase III quantitative message testing and survey evaluation. J Acad Nutr Diet 2013;113:277-391.e2.
47. International Food Information Council. Food insight: how consumers feel about food and nutrition messages. Washington (DC): Interna- tional Food Information Council; 2014.
48. Miller WR. Enhancing patient motivation for health behavior change. J Cardiopulm Rehabil 2005;25:207-9.
49. Mulgan G. Influencing public behavior to improve health and well- being. An independent report. London: United Kingdom Department of Health; 2010.
50. Norton A. Most Americans oppose soda, candy taxes. US News & World Rep Health 2013. [cited 2015 May 11]. Available from: http: //health.usnews.com/health-news/news/articles/2013/04/25/most-americans- oppose-soda-candy-taxes.
51. Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research. Obesity in the United States: public perceptions. Chicago: University of Chicago; 2013.
52. Gollust SE, Barry CL, Niederdeppe J. Americans' opinions about poli- cies to reduce consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages. Prev Med 2014;63:52-7.
53. Weiner R. The New York City ban explained. Washington Post. 2013. [cited 2015 May 11]. Available from: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/03/11/the-new-york-city-soda-ban-explained/.
54. Grynbaum M, Connelly M. 60% in city oppose Bloomberg's soda ban, poll finds. The New York Times. 2012. [cited 2015 May 11]. Available from: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/23/nyregion/most-new-yorkers- oppose-bloombergs-soda-ban.html?_r=0.
55. Rivard C, Smith D, McCann SE, Hyland A. Taxing sugar-sweetened beverages: a survey of knowledge, attitudes and behaviours. Public Health Nutr 2012;15:1355-61.
56. Hill D. Regulating for the public good in New York City. Redesigning choices: a framework of public health reform implementation in New York City. New Brunswick (NJ): Robert Woods Johnson Founda- tion; 2013.
57. Just D, Lund J, Price J. The role of variety in increasing the consump- tion of fruits and vegetables among children. Agri Resource Econ Rev 2012;41:72-81.
58. Just D, Wansink B. School nutrition: a kid's right to choose. Los An- geles Times. 2012. [cited 2015May 11]. Available from: http://articles.latimes.com/2012/feb/03/food/la-oe-just-wansink-a-better-approach-to-healthy- fo-20120203.
59. Just D, Price J. Default options, incentives and food choices: evidence from elementary-school children. Public Health Nutr 2013;16:2281-8.
60. Kakinami L, Barnett T, Paradis G. In praise of demanding parenting: the effects of parenting style and poverty on obesity risk in children: evidence from a nationally representative sample. Circulation 2014;129:AMP34.
61. North American Meat Institute. Back to Balance Survey results. Con- ducted using Toluna's on-line omnibus interviews. Washington (DC): American Meat Institute; 2014.
62. Hill J. Science and common sense demand a different approach to obesity. The Denver Post. 2013. [cited 2015 May 11]. Available from: http://blogs.denverpost.com/opinion/2013/11/25/science-and-common- sense-demand-a-different-approach-to-obesity/42211/.
63. Kreuter MW, Wray RJ. Tailored and targeted health communication: strategies for enhancing information relevance. Am J Health Behav 2003;27(Suppl 3):S227-32.
64. Petty R, Cacioppo J. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In: Berkowitz L, editor. Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol. 19. San Diego (CA): Academic Press; 1986.
65. Petty R. Cacioppo J. Communication and Persuasion: central and pe- ripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1986.
66. Hornick BA, Childs NM, Smith Edge M, Kapsak WR, Dooher C, White C. Is it time to rethink nutrition communications? A 5-year retrspective of Americans' attitudes toward food, nutrition and health. J Acad Nutr Diet 2013;113:15-23.
67. Wilson BJ. Designing media messages about health and nutrition: what strategies are most effective? J Nutr Educ Behav 2007;39:S13-9.
68. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Gateway to health com- munication & social marketing practice. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Dis- ease Control and Prevention; 2012.
69. Psota TL, Lohse B, West SG. Associations between eating competence and cardiovascular disease biomarkers. J Nutr Educ Behav 2007;39 (Suppl)S171-8.
70. Nitzke S, Freeland-Graves J; American Dietetic A. Position of the American Dietetic Association: total diet approach to communicating food and nutrition information. J Am Diet Assoc 2007;107:1224-32.
71. Satter E. Eating competence: definition and evidence for the Satter Eat- ing Competence model. J Nutr Educ Behav 2007;39:S142-53.
72. Satter E. Satter eating competence: nutrition education with the Satter eating competence model. J Nutr Educ Behav 2007;39:S189-94.
73. Goldberg JP, Sliwa SA. Communicating actionable nutrition messages: challenges and opportunities. Proc Nutr Soc 2011;70:26-37.
74. Glanz K, Basil M, Maibach E, Goldberg J, Snyder D.Why Americans eat what they do: taste, nutrition, cost, convenience, and weight control concerns as influences on food consumption. J Am Diet Assoc 1998; 98:1118-26.
75. Byrd-Bredbenner C, Abbot J, Cussler E. Psychographic segmentation of mothers of young children using food decision influencers. Nutr Res 2008;28:506-16.
76. Hanks AS, Just DR, Smith LE, Wansink B. Healthy convenience: nudg- ing students toward healthier choices in the lunchroom. J Public Health (Oxf) 2012;34:370-6.
77. Aldrich L. Consumer use of information. Implications for Food Policy. Agricultural handbook no. 715. Washington (DC): USDA, Economic Research Service; 1999.
78. Blaylock J, Smallwood D, Variyam J. Dietary fiber: is information the key? Food Rev 1996;19:24-30.
79. Moon W, Balasubramanian S, Rimal A. Perceived health benefits and soy consumption behavior: two-stage decision model approach. J Ag Resource Econ 2005;30:315-32.
80. Beydoun MA, Wang Y. How do socio-economic status, perceived eco- nomic barriers and nutrition benefits affect quality of dietary intake among US adults? Eur J Clin Nutr 2008;62:303-13.
81. May M. A non-restrictive approach to weight management for the pa- tient who has "tried everything." Phoenix (AZ): AmIHungry.com; 2011.
82. Schaefer JT, Magnuson AB. A review of the interventions that promot- ing eating by internal cues. J Acad Nutr Diet 2014;114:734-60.
83. Bacon L, Keim N, Van Loan M, Derricote M, Gale B, Kazaks A, Stern J. Evaluating a 'non-diet' wellness intervention for improvement of met- abolic fitness, psychological well-being and eating and activity behav- iors. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2002;26:854-65.
84. Bush HE, Rossy L, Mintz L, Schopp LB. Eat for life: a work site feasi- bility study of a novel mindfulness-based intuitive eating intervention. Am J Health Promot 2014;28:380-8.
85. Moshfegh A. State of the American Diet. 2015 Dietary Guidelines Ad- visory Committee Meeting; 2013 June 14; Bethesda (MD): Food Surveys Research Group, Agricultural Research Service, USDA; 2013.
86. Reel J, Stuart A. Is the "health at every size" approach useful to address- ing obesity? Commun Med Health Educ 2012;2:e105.
87. Participants of the 6th Global Conference on Health Promotion. The Bangkok Charter for Health Promotion in a Globalized World. 6th Global Conference on Health Promotion; 2005 Aug 7-11; Bangkok, Thailand; 2005.
88. Quote Investigator. I have gotten a lot of results! I know several thousand things that won't work [Internet]. 2012. [cited 2015 Apr 18]. Available from: quoteinvestigatorcom/2012/07/31/edison-lot-results/2012.