The intangible material of interactive art: Agency, behavior and emergence;El material intangible del arte interactivo: Agencia, comportamiento y emergencia

Artnodes

Volumn 2016, Issue 16, 2016, Pages 43-52

  Soler Adillon, Joan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Aesthetics; Agency; Behavior; Design; Emergence; Interactive art; Interactivity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84953407797     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16955951     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7238/a.v0i16.2744     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. ASHBY, W. R. (1957). An Introduction to Cybernetics. New York: Wiley.
2. BAECKER, R. M.; BUXTON, W. A. S. (1988). Readings in Human-Computer Interaction: A Multidisciplinary Approach. San Mateo, CA: Kaufmann.
3. BEDAU, M. A. (2008). “Downward Causation and Autonomy in Weak Emergence”. In: M. A. BEDAU, P. HUMPHREYS (eds.). Emergence. Contemporary Readings in Philosophy and Science. Cambridge, Massachussetts: MIT Press, pp. 155–188.
4. CARIANI, P. (1992). “Emergence and artificial life”. In: C. G. LANGTON, C. TAYLOR, J. D. FARMER, S. RASMUSSEN (eds.). Artificial Life II Reading, Massachussetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, pp. 775–797.
5. CARIANI, P. (1993). “To evolve an ear: epistemological implications of Gordon Pask’s electrochemical devices”. Systems Research, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 19–33.
6. CARIANI, P. (2009). “Strategies for Creating New Informational Primitives in Minds and Machines”. Proceedings of the Dagstuhl Seminar on Computational Creativity. Wadern, pp. 1–13.
7. CARIANI, P. (2011).“The Semiotics of Percept-Action Systems”. International Journal of Signs and Semiotic Systems, vol. 1, no.1, pp. 1–17. .
8. CARIANI, P. (2012). “Creating New Informational Primitives in Minds and Machines”. In: J. MCCORMACK and M. D’INVERNO (eds.). Computers and Creativity. New York: Springer, pp. 395–430.
9. CRAWFORD, C. (2003). Chris Crawford on Game Design. San Francisco: New Riders.
10. DOWNES, E. J.; McMILLAN, S. J. (2000). “Defining Interactivity: A Qualitative Identification of Key Dimensions”. New Media & Society, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 157–179.
11. DUBBERLY, H., & PANGARO, P. (2009). “What is conversation, and how can we design for it?”. Interactions Magazine (ACM), vol. 16, no. 4.
12. DUBBERLY, H.; PANGARO, P.; HAQUE, U. (2009). “What is interaction? Are there different types?”. Interactions Magazine (ACM), vol. 16, no. 1.
13. DURLAK, J. T. (1987). “A Typology for Interactive Media”. In: M. L. MCLAUGHLIN (ed.). Communication Yearboook. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, vol. 10, pp. 743–757.
14. th European Meeting of Cybernetics & Systems Research. Viena.
15. GREEN, J. (2010). “Interactivity and Agency in Real Time Systems”. Soft Borders Conference & Festival Proceedings. São Paulo, Brazil: Centro Universitário Belas Artes de São Paulo. Pp. 1–5.
16. HOLLAND, J. (1998). Emergence. From Chaos to Order. New York: Basic Books.
17. HOLLAND, O. (1997). “Grey Walter: The Pioneer of Real Artificial Life”. In: C. G. LANGTON and K. SHIMOHARA (eds.). Artificial Life V: Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on the Synthesis and Simulation of Living Systems. Cambridge, Massachussetts: MIT Press. Pp. 34–41.
18. HOLLAND, O. (2003). “The first biologically inspired robots”. Robotica, no. 21, pp. 351–363. .
19. JENSEN, J. F. (1998). “Interactivity” Tracking a New Concept in Media and Communication Studies”. Media and Communication Studies, Nordicon R, no. 1, pp 185–204.
20. JENSEN, J. F. (1999). “The Concept of “Interactivity” in Interactive Television”. In: J. F. JENSEN and C. TOSCAN (eds.). Interactive Television: TV of the Future or the Future of TV?. Aalborg: Aalborg Universitetsforlag, pp. 25–66.
21. KIOUSIS, S. (2002). “Interactivity: A concept explication”. New Media & Society, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 355–383. .
22. KRUEGER, M. (1991). Artificial Reality 2. New York: Addison-Wesley Professional.
23. LANGTON, C. G. (1988). “Artificial life”. In: C. G. LANGTON (ed.). Artificial Life: Proceedings of an Interdisciplinary Workshop on the Synthesis and Simulation of Living Systems. Boston: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. Pp. 1–47.
24. LATOUR, B. (1993). We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, Massachussetts: Harvard University Press.
25. LEE, K. M.; PARK, N.; JIN, S.-A. (2006). “Narrative and interactivity in computer games”. In: P. VORDERER and J. BRYANT (eds.). Playing video games: Motives, responses, and consequences. Nahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 259–274.
26. LEINER, D. J.; QUIRING, O. (2008). “What Interactivity Means to the User Essential Insights into and a Scale for Perceived Interactivity”. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 127–155.
27. LIU, Y.; SHRUM, L. J. (2002). “What Is Interactivity and Is It Always Such a Good Thing? Implications of Definition, Person, and Situation for the Influence of nteractivity on Advertising Effectiveness”. Journal of Advertising, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 53–64.
28. MECHANT, P. (2012). “An illustrated framework for the analysis of Web2 0 interactivity”. Contemporary Social Science, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 263–281.
29. NEWHAGEN, J. E. (2004). “Interactivity, Dynamic Symbol Processing, and the Emergence of Content in Human Communication”. The Information Society, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 395–400.
30. NOBLE, J. (2009). Programming Interactivity. A Designer’s Guide to Processing, Arduino, and OpenFramework. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.
31. PANGARO, P. (2009). “How Can I Put That? Applying Cybernetics to “Conversational Media”. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Cybernetics, pp. 1–16.
32. PASK, G. (1975). Conversation, Cognition and Learning. A Cybernetic Theory and Methodology. New York: Elsevier.
33. PASK, G. (1976). Conversation Theory: Applications in Education and Epistemology. New York: Elsevier.
34. PASK, G. (1996). “Heinz von Foerster’s Self-Organisation, the Progenitor of Conversation and Interaction Theories”. Systems Research, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 349–362. 30.CO;2-G>
35. PENNY, S. (2000). “Agents as Artworks: and Agent Design as Artistic Practice”. In: K. DAUTHENHAHN (ed.). Human Cognition and Social Agent Technology. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 395–414.
36. PENNY, S. (2011). “Towards a Performative Aesthetics of Interactivity”. Fiberculture, no. 19, pp. 72–108.
37. PENNY, S. (forthcoming). “Between rocks and hard places – Roboticsand Art, Computationalism and Embodiment”. In: D. HERATH, C. KROOS, and S. STELARC (eds.). Robots and Art: Exploring an Unlikely Symbiosis. Springer.
38. PICKERING, A. (1995). The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
39. PICKERING, A. (2002). “Cybernetics and the Mangle: Ashby, Beer and Pask”. Social Studies of Science, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 413–437.
40. PICKERING, A. (2008). “Ontological Theatre. Gordon Pask, Cybernetics,and the Arts”. Cybernetis And Human Knowing, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 43–57.
41. PICKERING, A. (2010). The Cybernetic Brain. Sketches of Another Future. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
42. QUIRING, O. (2009). “What do users associate with “interactivity”?: A qualitative study on user schemata”. New Media & Society, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 899–920.
43. RAFAELI, S. (1988). “Interactivity: From new media to communication”. Sage Annual Review of Communication Research: Advancing Communication Science, no. 16, pp. 110–134.
44. RAFAELI, S., SUNDWEEKS, F. (1997). “Networked Interactivity”. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 0–0.
45. RIBAS, J. I. (2001). “Difusió cultural i comunicació audiovisual interactiva”. Temes de Disseny, no. 18, pp. 170–204.
46. SOLER-ADILLON, J. (2011). “Creating Black Boxes: Emergence and Interactive Art”. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Electronic Art.
47. SOLERADILLON, J. (2012). Principios de diseño de interacción para sistemas interactivos.
48. SOLERADILLON, J. (2015). Emergence as Self-Organization and as Generation of Novelty. A Framework for Understanding Emergence in the Context of Interactive Art. Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
49. SOLERADILLON, J.; PENNY, S. (2014). Self-organization and novelty: pre-configurations of emergence in early British Cybernetics. In: Norbert Wiener in the 21st Century (21CW), 2014 IEEE Conference on. Boston, MA: IEEE, pp. 1-8.
50. STEELS, L. (1995). “The Artificial Life Roots of Artificial Intelligence”. In: C. G. LANGTON (ed.). Artificial life. An Overview1. Cambridge, Massachussetts: MIT Press, pp. 75-110.
51. SUNDAR, S. S. (2004). “Theorizing Interactivity’s Effects”. The Information Society, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 385–389.
52. WALTER, W. G. (1950). “An Imitation of Life”. Scientific American,vol. 182, no. 5, pp. 42–45.
53. WEBER, R., BEHR, K.-M., DEMARTINO, C. (2014). “MeasuringInteractivity in Video Games”. Communication Methods andMeasures, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 79–115.
54. WIENER, N. (1989). The Human Use of Human Beings. Cyberneticsand Society. London: Free Association Books.
55. WILSON, S. (1994). “The aestheteics and practice of designinginteractive computer events”. SIGGRAPH ’94 Visual Proceedings. ACM Press.
56. WU, G. (1999). “Perceived interactivity and attitude toward web sites”. Proceedings of the 1999 Conference of the American Academy of Advertising.