SugarSync forensic analysis

Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences

Volumn 48, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 95-117

  Shariati, Mohammad ^a   Dehghantanha, Ali ^a   Choo, Kim Kwang Raymond ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

cloud forensic; cloud storage forensic; digital forensics; SugarSync

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLOUD COMPUTING; COMPUTER PROGRAM; FORENSIC MEDICINE; MICROCOMPUTER; MOBILE APPLICATION; OFFENDER; SMARTPHONE;

EID: 84953356466     PISSN: 00450618     EISSN: 1834562X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00450618.2015.1021379     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Best Cloud Storage Providers and Reviews Online. 2014. [Cited 10 May 2014]. Available from: http://www.top10cloudstorage.com/
2. Chung H, Park J, Lee S, Kang C. Digital forensic investigation of cloud storage services. Digital Invest. 2012;9(2):81-95. doi:10.1016/j.diin.2012.05.015.
3. Galante J, Kharif OAP. Sony network breach shows Amazon cloud's appeal for hackers. Bloomberg: 2011 [cited 10 May 2014]. Available from: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-05-15/sony-attack-shows-amazon-s-cloud-service-lures-hackers-at-pennies-an-hour.html
4. Grispos G, Storer T, Glisson WB. Calm before the storm: the challenges of cloud. Int Jnl Dig Crime and For 4(2):28-48, 2012.
5. Hale JS. Amazon cloud drive forensic analysis. Digital Invest. 2013;10(3):259-265. doi:10.1016/j.diin.2013.04.006.
6. Hooper C, Martini B, Choo K-KR. Cloud computing and its implications for cybercrime investigations in Australia. Comput Law Security Rev. 2013;29(2):152-163. doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2013.01.006.
7. Martini B, Choo K-KR. An integrated conceptual digital forensic framework for cloud computing. Digital Invest. 2012;9(2):71-80. doi:10.1016/j.diin.2012.07.001.
8. Martini B, Choo K-KR. Cloud storage forensics: ownCloud as a case study. Digital Invest. 2013;10(4):287-299. doi:10.1016/j.diin.2013.08.005.
9. Quick D, Martini B, Choo K-K. Forensics, cloud storage. Syngress; 2014 Waltham, MA, USA.
10. Quick D, Choo K-KR. Digital droplets: Microsoft SkyDrive forensic data remnants. Future Gener Comp Sy. 2013;29(6):1378-1394. doi:10.1016/j.future.2013.02.001.
11. Quick D, Choo K-KR. Dropbox analysis: data remnants on user machines. Digital Invest. 2013;10(1):3-18. doi:10.1016/j.diin.2013.02.003.
12. Quick D, Choo K-KR. Forensic collection of cloud storage data: does the act of collection result in changes to the data or its metadata? Digital Invest. 2013;10(3):266-277. doi:10.1016/j.diin.2013.07.001.
13. Quick D, Choo K-KR. Google drive: forensic analysis of data remnants. J Network Comput Appl. 2014;40:179-193. doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2013.09.016.
14. Ruan K, Carthy J, Kechadi T, Crosbie M. Cloud Forensics. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology. 2011;35-46. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-24212-0-3.
15. Kleynhans S. The new PC era: the personal cloud. Gartner. 2012 [cited 2014 May 10]. Available from: http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/1947315
16. Thethi N, Keane A. Digital forensics investigations in the cloud. IEEE International Advance Computing Conference (IACC). 2014; 1475-1480. doi:10.1109/IAdCC.2014.6779543.
17. Choo KKR. Cloud computing: challenges and future directions. Trends Issues Crime Crim justice. 2010;400:1-6.
18. Martini B, Choo KKR. Distributed filesystem forensics: XtreemFS as a case study. Digital Investigation. 2014a;11(4):295-313.
19. Martini B, Choo KKR. Remote programmatic vcloud forensics. Proceedings of 13th IEEE International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications; 2014b September; TrustCom 2014.
20. Choo K-KR. Legal issues in the cloud. IEEE Cloud Comput Mag. 2014;1(1):94-96.
21. National Institute of Standards and Technology. NIST Cloud Computing Forensic Science Challenges. NIST draft NISTIR 8006; 2014.
22. Martini B, Choo KKR. Cloud forensic technical challenges and solutions: a snapshot. IEEE Cloud Comput Mag. 2014c;1(4):20-25.