Technico-economic assessment of coal and sawdust co-firing power generation with CO2 capture

Journal of Cleaner Production

Volumn 103, Issue , 2015, Pages 140-148

  Fogarasi, Szabolcs ^a   Cormos, Calin Cristian ^a  

^a BABE BOLYAI UNIVERSITY   (Romania)

Author keywords

CO2 capture; Renewable energy source; Sawdust co firing; Technico economic assessment

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; COAL; COSTS; ELECTRIC POWER GENERATION; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; FEEDSTOCKS; FOSSIL FUEL POWER PLANTS; FOSSIL FUELS; GAS EMISSIONS; GAS PLANTS; GREENHOUSE GASES; NATURAL RESOURCES; RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES;

CO-FIRING; CO-FIRING POWER PLANTS; COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT; ECONOMIC ASSESSMENTS; ELECTRICITY COSTS; ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION; POWER PLANT PERFORMANCE; RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCE;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

EID: 84953354770     PISSN: 09596526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.044     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. T. Abbasi, and S.A. Abbasi Biomass energy and the environmental impacts associated with its production and utilization Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 14 2010 919 937
2. F. Al-Mansour, and J. Zuwala An evaluation of biomass co-firing in Europe Biomass Bioenerg. 34 2010 620 629
3. P. Basu, J. Butler, and M.A. Leon Biomass co-firing options on the emission reduction and electricity generation costs in coal-fired power plants Renew. Energy 36 2011 282 288
4. S. Bringezu, H. Schütz, K. Arnold, F. Merten, S. Kabasci, P. Borelbach, C. Michels, G.A. Reinhardt, and N. Rettenmaier Global implications of biomass and biofuel use in Germany - recent trends and future scenarios for domestic and foreign agricultural land use and resulting GHG emissions J. Clean. Prod. 17 suppl. 1 2009 S57 S68
5. P. Carneiro, and P. Ferreira The economic, environmental and strategic value of biomass Renew. Energy 44 2012 17 22
6. S. Chakritthakul, and V.I. Kuprianov Co-firing of eucalyptus bark and rubberwood sawdust in a swirling fluidized-bed combustor using an axial flow swirler Bioresour. Technol. 102 2011 8268 8278
7. ChemCAD Chemical Process Simulation - Version 6.5 2013 Chemstations Huston, USA http://www.chemstations.com
8. H. Chum, A. Faaij, J. Moreira, G. Berndes, P. Dhamija, H. Dong, B. Gabrielle, A. Goss Eng, W. Lucht, M. Mapako, O. Masera Cerutti, T. McIntyre, T. Minowa, and K. Pingoud Bioenergy IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation 2011 Cambridge University Press Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA 209 331
9. C.-C. Cormos Integrated assessment of IGCC power generation technology with carbon capture and storage (CCS) Energy 42 2012 434 445
10. 2 capture Energy 51 2013 37 49
11. M. de Wit, and A. Faaij European biomass resource potential and costs Biomass Bioenerg. 34 2010 188 202
12. D. Dusmanescu, J. Andrei, and J. Subic Scenario for implementation of renewable energy sources in Romania Procedia Econ. Finance 8 2014 300 305
13. L.S. Esteban, and J.E. Carrasco Biomass resources and costs: assessment in different EU countries Biomass Bioenerg. 35 2011 S21 S30
14. EUROSTAT Energy Statistics - Supply, Transformation, Consumption 2011 http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/statistics/search-database
15. A. Evans, V. Strezov, and T.J. Evans Sustainability considerations for electricity generation from biomass Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 14 2010 1419 1427
16. W.A.W.A.K. Ghani, A. Mohd, G. da Silva, R.T. Bachmann, Y.H. Taufiq-Yap, U. Rashid, and A.a.H. Al-Muhtaseb Biochar production from waste rubber-wood-sawdust and its potential use in C sequestration: chemical and physical characterization Indust. Crops Prod. 44 2013 18 24
17. S. González-García, V. Bonnesoeur, A. Pizzi, G. Feijoo, and M.T. Moreira Comparing environmental impacts of different forest management scenarios for maritime pine biomass production in France J. Clean. Prod. 64 2014 356 367
18. J. Hansson, G. Berndes, F. Johnsson, and J. Kjärstad Co-firing biomass with coal for electricity generation - An assessment of the potential in EU27 Energy Policy 37 2009 1444 1455
19. W. Hatje, and M. Ruhl Use of biomass for power- and heat-generation: possibilities and limits Ecol. Eng. 16 suppl. 1 2000 41 49
20. B.S. Hoffmann, A. Szklo, and R. Schaeffer An evaluation of the techno-economic potential of co-firing coal with woody biomass in thermal power plants in the south of Brazil Biomass Bioenerg. 45 2012 295 302
21. K. Kamimura, H. Kuboyama, and K. Yamamoto Wood biomass supply costs and potential for biomass energy plants in Japan Biomass Bioenerg. 36 2012 107 115
22. 2 capture in an Australian Black coal-fired power plant Energy Procedia 37 2013 6035 6042
23. Z. Khorshidi, M.T. Ho, and D.E. Wiley The impact of biomass quality and quantity on the performance and economics of co-firing plants with and without CO2 capture Int. J. Greenh. Gas. Control 21 2014 191 202
24. X. Liang, Z. Wang, Z. Zhou, Z. Huang, J. Zhou, and K. Cen Up-to-date life cycle assessment and comparison study of clean coal power generation technologies in China J. Clean. Prod. 39 2013 24 31
25. A. Lüschen, and R. Madlener Economic viability of biomass cofiring in new hard-coal power plants in Germany Biomass Bioenerg. 57 2013 33 47
26. P. Mizsey, and L. Racz Cleaner production alternatives: biomass utilisation options J. Clean. Prod. 18 2010 767 770
27. M. Muresan, C.-C. Cormos, and P.-S. Agachi Techno-economical assessment of coal and biomass gasification-based hydrogen production supply chain system Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 91 2013 1527 1541
28. S.N. Naik, V.V. Goud, P.K. Rout, and A.K. Dalai Production of first and second generation biofuels: a comprehensive review Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 14 2010 578 597
29. W.P.Q. Ng, H.L. Lam, F.Y. Ng, M. Kamal, and J.H.E. Lim Waste-to-wealth: green potential from palm biomass in Malaysia J. Clean. Prod. 34 2012 57 65
30. N. Nikolopoulos, M. Agraniotis, I. Violidakis, E. Karampinis, A. Nikolopoulos, P. Grammelis, C. Papapavlou, S. Tzivenis, and E. Kakaras Parametric investigation of a renewable alternative for utilities adopting the co-firing lignite/biomass concept Fuel 113 2013 873 897
31. A. Padurean, C.-C. Cormos, and P.-S. Agachi Pre-combustion carbon dioxide capture by gas-liquid absorption for integrated gasification combined cycle power plants Int. J. Greenh. Gas. Control 7 2012 1 11
32. A. Padurean, C.-C. Cormos, A.-M. Cormos, and P.-S. Agachi Multicriterial analysis of post-combustion carbon dioxide capture using alkanolamines Int. J. Greenh. Gas. Control 5 2011 676 685
33. P. Purohit Economic potential of biomass gasification projects under clean development mechanism in India J. Clean. Prod. 17 2009 181 193
34. REN21 Renewables 2013 Global Status Report 2013 Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century Secretariat Paris, France 1 178
35. 2 capture J. Clean. Prod. 18 2010 875 880
36. Rwe AG The WTA Technology: a Modern Process for Treating and Drying Lignite 2013 www.rwe.com
37. N. Scarlat, V. Blujdea, and J.-F. Dallemand Assessment of the availability of agricultural and forest residues for bioenergy production in Romania Biomass Bioenerg. 35 2011 1995 2005
38. W. White, A. Lunnan, E. Nybakk, and B. Kulisic The role of governments in renewable energy: the importance of policy consistency Biomass Bioenerg. 57 2013 97 105
39. G. Xydis On the exergetic capacity factor of a wind - solar power generation system J. Clean. Prod. 47 2013 437 445
40. H. Zhai, E.S. Rubin, and P.L. Versteeg Water use at pulverized coal power plants with postcombustion carbon capture and storage Environ. Sci. Technol. 45 2011 2479 2485
41. J. Zuwała Life cycle approach for energy and environmental analysis of biomass and coal co-firing in CHP plant with backpressure turbine J. Clean. Prod. 35 2012 164 175