Tort Law Culture in the United Kingdom: Image and Reality in Personal Injury Compensation

Journal of European Tort Law

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 230-264

  Lewis, Richard ^a   Morris, Annette ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84953290515     PISSN: 18689612     EISSN: 18689620     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/jetl-2012-0230     Document Type: Article

References (99)

1. R Cotterrell, Law, Culture and Society (2006) 83.
2. DM Engel/JS Engel, Tort, Custom and Karma (2010) 11.
3. D Nelken, Law, Liability and Culture, in: DM Engel/M McCann (eds), Fault Lines: Tort Law as Cultural Practice (2009) 22.
4. The lack of coherent policy behind compulsory insurance was traced in R Lewis, The Duty to Insure (2004) 154 New Law Journal (NLJ) 1474.
5. C Parsons, Employers Liability Insurance - How Secure is the System? (1999) 28 Industrial Law Journal (ILJ) 109.
6. Department for Work and Pensions, Compensation Recovery Unit - Performance Statistics .
7. PS Atiyah, The Damages Lottery (1997) 99.
8. Pearson Commission (fn 6) vol 2 table 57.
9. In Australia they are less than a fifth according to H Luntz/D Hambly, Torts: Cases and Commentary (5th edn 2002) 4.
10. D Harris et al, Compensation and Support for Illness and Injury (1984) table 2.1.
11. Datamonitor, UK Personal Injury Litigation (2003) 79.
12. DR Hensler et al, Compensation for Accidental Injuries in the United States (1991) 122.
13. J Stapleton, Disease and the Compensation Debate (1986).
14. The Lord Chancellor's Department, Report of the Review Body on Civil Justice (1988, cm 394) § 391.
15. J Steele, Risks and Legal Theory (2004) 36: 'Insurance “technology” underlies the whole practice of tort law.' Without insurance, it is probable that tort liability itself could not survive.
16. JG Fleming, The American Tort Process (1988) 21;
17. R Lewis, How Important Are Insurers In Compensating Claims for Personal Injury In The UK? (2006) 31 The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance 323.
18. R Lewis, Insurers and Personal Injury Litigation: Acknowledging 'The Elephant in the Living Room' [2005] Journal of Personal Injury Law (JPIL) 1.
19. R Lewis, Insurance and the Tort System (2005) 25 Legal Studies (LS) 85.
20. C Parsons, An Analysis of Current Problems in the UK Liability Insurance Market, Office of Fair Trading Report (OFT 659 a, 2003) § 5.6.
21. IMAS Corporate Finance (on behalf of TheCityUK and UK Trade & Investment), UK Financial Services: Ownership, Value and M&A Developments (2012).
22. Ernst and Young, Bringing Profitability back from the Brink of Extinction: A Report on the UK Retail Insurance Market (Chartered Insurance Institute, 2011) 17.
23. DW Elliott/H Street, Road Accidents (1968) 209.
24. T Goriely/R Moorhead/P Abrams, More Civil Justice? The Impact of the Woolf Reforms on Pre-Action Behaviour (2002) 90.
25. R Lewis, Litigation Costs and Before-The-Event Insurance: The Key to Access to Justice? (2011) 74 Modern Law Review (MLR) 272.
26. FWD Group, The Market for 'BTE' Legal Expenses Insurance (2007) § 3.3.
27. Mintel International Group, Legal Expenses Insurance (2008).
28. H Blundell, Free to Choose? BTE Legal Expenses Insurance and Freedom of Choice [2004] JPIL 93.
29. P Abram, In Sure Hands? (2002).
30. L Mulcahy, Legal Architecture: Justice, Due Process and the Place of Law (2011).
31. Pearson Commission (fn 6) vol 2 table 12.
32. P Pleasence, Personal Injury Litigation in Practice (1998) 12.
33. P Cornes, Coping with Catastrophic Injury (1993) 20.
34. J Grisham, The Runaway Jury (1996).
35. K Oliphant in: H Koziol/BC Steininger (eds), European Tort Law 2002 (2003) 142, no 13, and in (2002) 12 (3) Association of Personal Injury Lawyers Newsletter 19.
36. Anon, Case Conundrum? (2011) 161 NLJ 1569.
37. S Lloyd-Bostock, Commonsense Morality and Accident Compensation in: DP Farrington et al (eds), Psychology, Law and Legal Processes (1979).
38. H Genn, Hard Bargaining (1987) 73.
39. HL Ross, Settled Out of Court (1980).
40. R Dingwall et al, Firm Handling: The Litigation Strategies of Defence Lawyers in Personal Injury Cases (2000) 20 LS 1.
41. D Dewees/D Duff/M Trebilcock, Exploring the Domain of Accident Law: Taking the Facts Seriously (1996) 19.
42. PA Bell/J O'Connell, Accidental Justice: The Dilemmas of Tort Law (1997) 63 ff.
43. Pearson Commission (fn 6) vol 2 table 107.
44. P Fenn/N Rickman, Costs of Low Value Liability Claims 1997-2002 (2003)
45. Department for Constitutional Affairs, .
46. House of Commons Transport Committee, The Cost of Motor Insurance, Fourth Report of Session 2010-11 vol 1 (HC 591) § 16, available online at .
47. The Compensation Recovery Unit issues a nil certificate in 70% of the cases where a compensator intends to make a payment. See R Lewis, Deducting Benefits from Damages for Personal Injury (1999) § 14.05.
48. Lord Chancellor's Department, Courts Bill: Regulatory Impact Assessment (November 2002) table 1.
49. R Lewis/R McNabb/V Wass, Court Awards of Damages for Loss of Future Earnings: An Empirical Study and an Alternative Method of Calculation (2002) 29 Journal of Law & Society (J Law & Soc) 406 and [2002] JPIL 151.
50. K Williams, State of Fear: Britain's 'Compensation Culture' Reviewed (2005) 25 LS 499;
51. R Lewis/A Morris/K Oliphant, Tort Personal Injury Statistics: Is There a Compensation Culture in the UK? (2006) 14 Torts Law Journal (TLJ) 158;
52. R Mullender, Negligence Law and Blame Culture: A Critical Response to a Possible Problem (2006) 22 Professional Negligence (PN) 2;
53. A Morris, Spiralling or Stabilising? The Compensation Culture and our Propensity to Claim Damages for Personal Injury (2007) 70 MLR 349
54. J Hand, The Compensation Culture: Cliché or Cause for Concern? (2010) 37 J Law & Soc 569.
55. P Broster, War on the scroungers (The Express, 29 November 2004).
56. P Toynbee, A compensation culture makes victims of us all (The Guardian, 21 April 1999).
57. F Furedi, Courting Mistrust: The Hidden Growth of the Culture of Litigation in Britain (1999);
58. D Lloyd, The Compensation Culture: A New Legal Paternalism?, in: E Lee (ed), Compensation Crazy: Do we Blame and Claim Too Much? (2002) 49 C Harlow, State Liability: Tort Liability and Beyond (2004).
59. For further information on the development of the personal injury claims market, see R Abel, English Lawyers between Market and State: The Politics of Professionalism (2003)
60. H Kritzer, The Fracturing Legal Profession: The Case of Plaintiffs' Personal Injury Lawyers (2001) 8 International Journal of the Legal Profession 225.
61. See further Boleat Consulting, The Claims Standards Council (December 2005).
62. National Association of Citizens Advice Bureaux, Door to Door: CAB Clients' Experiences of Doorstep Selling (September 2002).
63. P Rohan, Law Society Votes to Allow Referral Fees” LS Gaz 9 January 2004.
64. Vanilla Research, Referral Arrangements Research (2010);
65. Charles River Associates, Cost Benefit Analysis of Policy Options Related to Referral Fees in Legal Services (2010);
66. Legal Services Board, Referral Fees, Referral Arrangements and Fee Sharing: Decision Document (2011);
67. A Higgins, Referral Fees - The Business of Access to Justice (2012) 32 LS 109.
68. M Boleat, Claims Management Regulation: Impact of Regulation Third Year Assessment (2010);
69. R Jackson, Review of Civil Litigation Costs: Final Report (January 2010) § 3.18.
70. J Hyde, New Claims Company Aims High, LS Gaz (17 November 2011) 1.
71. R Moorhead, Conditional Fee Agreements, Legal Aid and Access to Justice (1999) 33 University of British Columbia Law Review (UBC L Rev) 471
72. R Abel, An American Hamburger Stand in St Paul's Cathedral: Replacing Legal Aid with Conditional Fees in English Personal Injury Litigation (2001) 51 DePaul Law Review (DePaul L Rev) 253.
73. Pearson Commission (fn 6) vol 2 § 59.
74. The CRU statistics are available at .
75. Department of Health, An Organisation with a Memory: Report of an Expert Group on Learning from Adverse Events in the NHS (2000).
76. These data estimates are derived from the Home Accident Surveillance System (HASS) and Leisure Accident Surveillance System (LASS) run by the Department of Industry, both of which closed in 2003. The data are now available from the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents: .
77. .
78. S Pickvance, A Little Compensation (2005) Hazards, .
79. K Williams, Politics, the Media and Refining the Notion of Fault: Section 1 of the Compensation Act 2006 [2006] JPIL 347.
80. W Felstiner/R Abel/A Sarat, The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming and Claiming (1981) 15 L & Soc Rev 631.
81. M Galanter, Reading the Landscape of Disputes: What we Know and Don't Know (And Think we Know) About Our Allegedly Contentious and Litigious Society (1983) 31 University of California at Los Angeles Law Review (UCLA L Rev) 4, 61.
82. Markesinis suggests that feelings of entitlement are one reason for the higher rates of claiming in the United States compared with the UK: B Markesinis, Litigation-Mania in England, Germany and the USA: Are we so Very Different? (1999) 49 Cambridge Law Journal (CLJ) 233, 254.
83. See further P Fenn/A Gray/N Rickman, The Impact of Conditional Fees on the Selection, Handling and Outcome of Personal Injury Cases (2002);
84. P Fenn/A Gray/N Rickman, The Impact of Sources of Finance on Personal Injury Litigation (2002);
85. R White/R Atkinson, Personal Injury Litigation, Conditional Fees and After-the-Event Insurance (2000) 19 Civil Justice Quarterly (CJQ) 118.
86. These statistics are published on the Department for Transport website at: .
87. Department for Transport, Reported Road Casualties in Great Britain: 2010 Annual Report (2011).
88. Association of British Insurers, Tackling Whiplash: Prevention, Care and Compensation (2008).
89. A Ellis, Is data mining a major factor in the personal injury claims spike (Post Magazine, 1 November 2011).
90. J Straw, Dirty secret that drives up motor insurance; Companies are selling drivers' details to claims firms exploiting no-win no-fee system (The Times, 27 June 2011).
91. Ellis, Post Magazine, 1 November 2011.
92. Financial Services Authority, Third Party Capture - What You Need to Consider, .
93. Straw, The Times, 27 June 2011.
94. J McQuater, The RTA Claims Process [2010] JPIL 103
95. R Hill, The New RTA Protocol (2010) 107(12) LS Gaz 29.
96. RE Miller/A Sarat, Grievances, Claims and Disputes: Assessing the Adversary Culture (1980) 15 L & Soc Rev 525.
97. Galanter (1983) 31 UCLA L Rev 4, 61.
98. D Coates/S Penrod, Social Psychology and the Emergence of Disputes (1980-1) 15 L & Soc Rev 655, 658.
99. H Kritzer, Propensity to Sue in England and the United States of America: Blaming and Claiming in Tort Cases (1991) 18 J Law & Soc 400, 420.