Journal Impact factor shapes scientists' reward signal in the prospect of publication

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 11, 2015, Pages

  Paulus, Frieder Michel ^a   Rademacher, Lena ^a   Schäfer, Theo Alexander Jose ^a   Müller Pinzler, Laura ^a   Krach, Sören ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LÜBECK   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR; ECOLOGICAL NICHE; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; HABITAT; HUMAN; JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR; NUCLEUS ACCUMBENS; PUBLICATION; REWARD; SCIENTIST; PUBLISHING;

JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR; PUBLISHING;

EID: 84953240618     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142537     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Lehmann S, Jackson AD, Lautrup BE. Measures for measures. Nature. 2006; 444: 1003-1004. doi: 10. 1038/4441003a
2. Van Dijk D, Manor O, Carey LB. Publication metrics and success on the academic job market. Curr Biol. 2014; 24: R516-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.04.039
3. Editorial. Not-so-deep impact. Nature. 2005; 435: 1003-1004. doi: 10.1038/4351003b
4. Garfield E. The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA. 2006; 295: 90-93. doi: 10. 1001/jama.295.1.90
5. Werner RF. The focus on bibliometrics makes papers less useful. 2015; 2015.
6. Reich ES. Science publishing: The golden club. Nature. 2013; 502: 291-293. doi: 10.1038/502291a
7. Alberts B. Impact Factor Distortions. Science. 2013; 340: 787. doi: 10.1126/science.1240319
8. Simons K. The misused impact factor. Science (New York, N.Y.). 2008. p. 165. doi: 10.1126/science. 1165316
9. Schekman R. How journals like Nature, Cell and Science are damaging science. In: The Guardian [Internet]. 2013. Accessed 2 Oct 2015. Available: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/dec/09/how-journals-nature-science-cell-damage-science
10. Berridge KC. Pleasure, pain, desire, and dread: hidden core processes of emotion. In: Kahneman D, Diener E, Schwarz N, editors. Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation; 1999. pp. 525-557.
11. Schultz W. Multiple reward signals in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. Nature Publishing Group; 2000; 1: 199-207.
12. Bromberg-Martin ES, Hikosaka O. Midbrain dopamine neurons signal preference for advance information about upcoming rewards. Neuron. 2009; 63: 119-126. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.06.009
13. Morris G, Nevet A, Arkadir D, Vaadia E, Bergman H. Midbrain dopamine neurons encode decisions for future action. Nat Neurosci. 2006; 9: 1057-1063. doi: 10.1038/nn1743
14. Day JJ, Jones JL, Wightman RM, Carelli RM. Phasic nucleus accumbens dopamine release encodes effort-And delay-related costs. Biol Psychiatry. 2010; 68: 306-9. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.03.026
15. Kirsch P, Schienle A, Stark R, Sammer G, Blecker C, Walter B, et al. Anticipation of reward in a nonaversive differential conditioning paradigm and the brain reward system: an event-related fMRI study. Neuroimage. 2003; 20: 1086-1095. doi: 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00381-1
16. Knutson B, Adams CM, Fong GW, Hommer D. Anticipation of increasing monetary reward selectively recruits nucleus accumbens. J Neurosci. 2001; 21: RC159.
17. O'Doherty JP, Deichmann R, Critchley HD, Dolan RJ. Neural responses during anticipation of a primary taste reward. Neuron. 2002; 33: 815-826. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00603-7
18. Spreckelmeyer KN, Krach S, Kohls G, Rademacher L, Irmak A, Konrad K, et al. Anticipation of monetary and social reward differently activates mesolimbic brain structures in men and women. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2009; 4: 158-165. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsn051
19. Rademacher L, Krach S, Kohls G, Irmak A, Gründer G, Spreckelmeyer KN. Dissociation of neural networks for anticipation and consumption of monetary and social rewards. Neuroimage. Elsevier B.V.; 2010; 49: 3276-3285. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.089
20. Sescousse G, Li Y, Dreher J-C. A common currency for the computation of motivational values in the human striatum. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2015; 10: 467-473. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsu074
21. Rolls ET, McCabe C. Enhanced affective brain representations of chocolate in cravers vs. non-cravers. Eur J Neurosci. 2007; 26: 1067-1076. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05724.x
22. Sekercioglu CH. Quantifying coauthor contributions. Science. 2008; 322: 371. doi: 10.1126/science. 322.5900.371a
23. Yarkoni T, Poldrack RA, Nichols TE, Van Essen DC, Wager TD. Large-scale automated synthesis of human functional neuroimaging data. Nat Methods. 2011; 8: 665-670. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1635
24. Brett M, Anton J-L, Valabregue R, Jean-Baptiste P. Region of interest analysis using an SPM toolbox. 8th International Conference on Functional Mapping of the Human Brain. 2002.
25. Salamone JD, Correa M. The mysterious motivational functions of mesolimbic dopamine. Neuron. 2012; 76: 470-85. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.10.021
26. Kroemer NB, Guevara A, Ciocanea Teodorescu I, Wuttig F, Kobiella A, Smolka MN. Balancing reward and work: anticipatory brain activation in NAcc and VTA predict effort differentially. Neuroimage. 2014; 102 Pt 2: 510-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.07.060
27. Alberts B, Cicerone RJ, Fienberg SE, Kamb A, McNutt M, Nerem RM, et al. Self-correction in science at work. Science (80-). 2015; 348: 1420-1422. doi: 10.1126/science.aab3847
28. Deci EL, Koestner R, Ryan RM. A meta-Analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychol Bull. 1999; 125: 627-700. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.6. 627