-
1
-
-
77953688080
-
Mixed treatment comparison analysis provides internally coherent treatment effect estimates based on overviews of reviews and can reveal inconsistency
-
Caldwell DM, Welton NJ, Ades AE. Mixed treatment comparison analysis provides internally coherent treatment effect estimates based on overviews of reviews and can reveal inconsistency. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:875-82.
-
(2010)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.63
, pp. 875-882
-
-
Caldwell, D.M.1
Welton, N.J.2
Ades, A.E.3
-
2
-
-
84867861572
-
Overviews of reviews often have limited rigor: a systematic review
-
Pieper D, Buechter R, Jerinic P, Eikermann M. Overviews of reviews often have limited rigor: a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012;65(12):1267-73.
-
(2012)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.65
, Issue.12
, pp. 1267-1273
-
-
Pieper, D.1
Buechter, R.2
Jerinic, P.3
Eikermann, M.4
-
3
-
-
0037098151
-
Identification of randomized controlled trials in systematic reviews: accuracy and reliability of screening records
-
Edwards P, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Pratap S, Roberts I, Wentz R. Identification of randomized controlled trials in systematic reviews: accuracy and reliability of screening records. Stat Med. 2002;21(11):1635-40.
-
(2002)
Stat Med
, vol.21
, Issue.11
, pp. 1635-1640
-
-
Edwards, P.1
Clarke, M.2
DiGuiseppi, C.3
Pratap, S.4
Roberts, I.5
Wentz, R.6
-
4
-
-
84907596345
-
Evidence gap maps-a tool for promoting evidence-informed policy and prioritizing future research
-
Washington DC: World Bank Group Contract no. WPS 6725 Accessed 13 July 2015
-
Snilstveit B, Vojtkova M, Bhavsar A, Gaarder M. Evidence gap maps-a tool for promoting evidence-informed policy and prioritizing future research. Policy Research working paper. In. Washington DC: World Bank Group Contract no. WPS 6725. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2013/12/18648542/evidence-gap-maps-tool-promoting-evidence-informed-policy-prioritizing-future-research. Accessed 13 July 2015.; 2013.
-
(2013)
Policy Research working paper
-
-
Snilstveit, B.1
Vojtkova, M.2
Bhavsar, A.3
Gaarder, M.4
-
5
-
-
84924813692
-
A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency
-
Pham MT, Rajić A, Greig JD, Sargeant JM, Papadopoulos A, McEwen SA. A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Res Synth Methods. 2014;5(4):371-85.
-
(2014)
Res Synth Methods
, vol.5
, Issue.4
, pp. 371-385
-
-
Pham, M.T.1
Rajić, A.2
Greig, J.D.3
Sargeant, J.M.4
Papadopoulos, A.5
McEwen, S.A.6
-
6
-
-
79958838678
-
The global evidence mapping initiative: scoping research in broad topic areas
-
Bragge P, Clavisi O, Turner T, Tavender E, Collie A, Gruen RL. The global evidence mapping initiative: scoping research in broad topic areas. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11(1):92.
-
(2011)
BMC Med Res Methodol
, vol.11
, Issue.1
, pp. 92
-
-
Bragge, P.1
Clavisi, O.2
Turner, T.3
Tavender, E.4
Collie, A.5
Gruen, R.L.6
-
7
-
-
84927917456
-
Health status of and health-care provision to asylum seekers in Germany: protocol for a systematic review and evidence mapping of empirical studies
-
Schneider C, Mohsenpour A, Joos S, Bozorgmehr K. Health status of and health-care provision to asylum seekers in Germany: protocol for a systematic review and evidence mapping of empirical studies. Syst Rev. 2014;3:139.
-
(2014)
Syst Rev
, vol.3
, pp. 139
-
-
Schneider, C.1
Mohsenpour, A.2
Joos, S.3
Bozorgmehr, K.4
-
8
-
-
84883195586
-
Evidence mapping: methodologic foundations and application to intervention and observational research on sugar-sweetened beverages and health outcomes
-
Althuis MD, Weed DL. Evidence mapping: methodologic foundations and application to intervention and observational research on sugar-sweetened beverages and health outcomes. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;98(3):755-68.
-
(2013)
Am J Clin Nutr
, vol.98
, Issue.3
, pp. 755-768
-
-
Althuis, M.D.1
Weed, D.L.2
-
10
-
-
14644388070
-
Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework
-
Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19-32.
-
(2005)
Int J Soc Res Methodol
, vol.8
, Issue.1
, pp. 19-32
-
-
Arksey, H.1
O'Malley, L.2
-
11
-
-
79952121275
-
'Scoping the scope' of a Cochrane review
-
Armstrong R, Hall BJ, Doyle J, Waters E. 'Scoping the scope' of a Cochrane review. J Public Health. 2011;33(1):147-50.
-
(2011)
J Public Health
, vol.33
, Issue.1
, pp. 147-150
-
-
Armstrong, R.1
Hall, B.J.2
Doyle, J.3
Waters, E.4
-
12
-
-
84875195425
-
Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team's experience with Arksey and O'Malley's framework
-
Daudt HM, Van Mossel C, Scott SJ. Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team's experience with Arksey and O'Malley's framework. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13(1):48.
-
(2013)
BMC Med Res Methodol
, vol.13
, Issue.1
, pp. 48
-
-
Daudt, H.M.1
Mossel, C.2
Scott, S.J.3
-
14
-
-
84920780781
-
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement
-
Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4(1):1.
-
(2015)
Syst Rev
, vol.4
, Issue.1
, pp. 1
-
-
Moher, D.1
Shamseer, L.2
Clarke, M.3
Ghersi, D.4
Liberati, A.5
Petticrew, M.6
-
15
-
-
33746910186
-
Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science
-
Bakkalbasi N, Bauer K, Glover J, Wang L. Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science. Biomed Digit Libr. 2006;3:7.
-
(2006)
Biomed Digit Libr
, vol.3
, pp. 7
-
-
Bakkalbasi, N.1
Bauer, K.2
Glover, J.3
Wang, L.4
-
16
-
-
84954285803
-
Retrieval of overviews of systematic reviews in MEDLINE was improved by a validated search strategy
-
Article in Press
-
Lunny C, McKenzie JE, McDonald S. Retrieval of overviews of systematic reviews in MEDLINE was improved by a validated search strategy. J Clin Epidemiol. Article in Press; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.12.002.
-
J Clin Epidemiol
-
-
Lunny, C.1
McKenzie, J.E.2
McDonald, S.3
-
17
-
-
84915803004
-
Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions
-
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Kirkham J, Dwan K, Kramer S, Green S, et al. Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;10:MR000035.
-
(2014)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
, vol.10
-
-
Page, M.J.1
McKenzie, J.E.2
Kirkham, J.3
Dwan, K.4
Kramer, S.5
Green, S.6
-
18
-
-
84872362858
-
Industry sponsorship and research outcome
-
Lundh A, Sismondo S, Lexchin J, Busuioc OA, Bero L. Industry sponsorship and research outcome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;12:Mr000033.
-
(2012)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
, vol.12
-
-
Lundh, A.1
Sismondo, S.2
Lexchin, J.3
Busuioc, O.A.4
Bero, L.5
-
19
-
-
84953645462
-
Association between personal conflicts of interest and recommendations on medical interventions
-
Lundh A, Jørgensen AW, Bero L. Association between personal conflicts of interest and recommendations on medical interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;6(MR000040). doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000040.
-
(2013)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
, vol.6
-
-
Lundh, A.1
Jørgensen, A.W.2
Bero, L.3
-
20
-
-
84952360296
-
ROBIS: a new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed
-
Whiting P, Savovic J, Higgins JP, Caldwell DM, Reeves BC, Shea B, et al. ROBIS: a new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.06.005.
-
(2015)
J Clin Epidemiol
-
-
Whiting, P.1
Savovic, J.2
Higgins, J.P.3
Caldwell, D.M.4
Reeves, B.C.5
Shea, B.6
-
21
-
-
63849105841
-
Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions Version 5.1. 0 [updated March 2011]
-
Cochrane Collab. 2011 (editors) Accessed 13 July 2015. In
-
Higgins JPT, Green, S. (editors). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions Version 5.1. 0 [updated March 2011]. Cochrane Collab. 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org. Accessed 13 July 2015. In.; 2011.
-
(2011)
-
-
Higgins, J.P.T.1
Green, S.2
-
22
-
-
66449109465
-
Search strategies to identify information on adverse effects: a systematic review
-
Golder S, Loke Y. Search strategies to identify information on adverse effects: a systematic review. J Med Libr Assoc. 2009;97(2):84-92.
-
(2009)
J Med Libr Assoc
, vol.97
, Issue.2
, pp. 84-92
-
-
Golder, S.1
Loke, Y.2
-
23
-
-
84875557018
-
The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses
-
Accessed 13 July 2015 2000.
-
Wells G, Shea B, O'connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, Tugwell P. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp. Accessed 13 July 2015 2000.
-
Ottawa: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
-
-
Wells, G.1
Shea, B.2
O'connell, D.3
Peterson, J.4
Welch, V.5
Losos, M.6
Tugwell, P.7
-
24
-
-
67849127882
-
AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews
-
Shea BJ, Hamel C, Wells GA, Bouter LM, Kristjansson E, Grimshaw J, et al. AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. In: J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62:1013-20.
-
(2009)
In: J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.62
, pp. 1013-1020
-
-
Shea, B.J.1
Hamel, C.2
Wells, G.A.3
Bouter, L.M.4
Kristjansson, E.5
Grimshaw, J.6
-
25
-
-
84872699678
-
-
London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence
-
NICE. The guidelines manual. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. http://www.nice.org.uk/article/pmg6b/chapter/Appendix%20B%3a%20Methodology%20checklist%3a%20systematic%20reviews%20and%20metaanalyses. Accessed 13 July 2015
-
The guidelines manual
-
-
-
26
-
-
43049113533
-
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
-
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336(7650):924-6.
-
(2008)
BMJ
, vol.336
, Issue.7650
, pp. 924-926
-
-
Guyatt, G.H.1
Oxman, A.D.2
Vist, G.E.3
Kunz, R.4
Falck-Ytter, Y.5
Alonso-Coello, P.6
-
27
-
-
0035845305
-
A new system for grading recommendations in evidence based guidelines
-
Harbour R, Miller J. A new system for grading recommendations in evidence based guidelines. BMJ. 2001;323(7308):334-6.
-
(2001)
BMJ
, vol.323
, Issue.7308
, pp. 334-336
-
-
Harbour, R.1
Miller, J.2
-
28
-
-
79952045714
-
FORM: an Australian method for formulating and grading recommendations in evidence-based clinical guidelines
-
Hillier S, Grimmer-Somers K, Merlin T, Middleton P, Salisbury J, Tooher R, et al. FORM: an Australian method for formulating and grading recommendations in evidence-based clinical guidelines. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11:23.
-
(2011)
BMC Med Res Methodol
, vol.11
, pp. 23
-
-
Hillier, S.1
Grimmer-Somers, K.2
Merlin, T.3
Middleton, P.4
Salisbury, J.5
Tooher, R.6
|