The LABY microworld: A platform for research, training and system engineering

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn 2014-January, Issue , 2014, Pages 1038-1042

  Imbert, Jean Paul ^a   Hodgetts, Helen M ^b,c   Parise, Robert ^d   Vachon, François ^b   Tremblay, Sébastien ^b  

^a ENAC   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

^c CARDIFF METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^d Egis Avia   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; HUMAN ENGINEERING; SYSTEMS ENGINEERING; TRAFFIC CONTROL; TRAINING AIRCRAFT;

AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL (ATC); AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT; FUNCTIONAL SIMULATIONS; HUMAN FACTORS RESEARCH; HUMAN MACHINE INTERFACE; HUMAN-IN-THE-LOOP; NON-TECHNICAL SKILLS; POTENTIAL CONFLICT;

ERGONOMICS;

EID: 84953215187     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1177/1541931214581217     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Alonso, R., Causse, M., Vachon, F., Parise, R., Dehais, F., & Terrier, P. (2013). Evaluation of head-free eye tracking as an input device for air traffic control. Ergonomics, 56, 246-255.
2. Alonso, R., Terrier, P., Parise, R., & Cellier, J.M. (2010). Effet d'une de corrélation visuo-motrice sur le mouvement de pointage. Le Travail Humain, 72, 245-66.
3. Brehmer, B. (1992). Dynamic decision making: Human control of complex systems. Acta Psychologica, 81, 211-241.
4. Brehmer, B., & Dörner, D. (1993). Experiments with computer-simulated microworlds: Escaping both the narrow straits of the laboratory and the deep blue sea of the field study. Computers in Human Behavior, 9, 171-184.
5. DiFonzo, N., Hantula, D., & Bordia, P. (1998). Microworlds for experimental research: Having your (control and collection) cake, and realism too. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 30, 278-286.
6. th International ISCRAM Conference, Vancouver.
7. th International AHFE Conference, Krakow, Poland.
8. Gonzalez, C., Vanyukov, P., & Martin, M. K. (2005). The use of microworlds to study dynamic decision making. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 273-286.
9. Gray, W. D. (2002). Simulated task environments: The role of high-fidelity simulations, scaled worlds, synthetic environments, and laboratory tasks in basic and applied cognitive research. Cognitive Science Quarterly, 2, 205-227.
10. Hodgetts, H.M., Vachon, F., & Tremblay, S. (2014). Background sound impairs interruption recovery in dynamic tasks: Procedural conflict? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28, 10-21.
11. Imbert, J.-P, Hodgetts, H. M., Parise, R., Vachon, F., & Tremblay, S. (submitted). Attentional costs and failures in air traffic control notifications. Ergonomics.
12. rd HFES Annual Meeting (pp. 1220-1224).
13. Lafond, D., Tremblay, S., DuCharme, M. B., St-Louis, M. E., & Gagnon, J. F. (2012). Assessment and Refinement of an Intelligent Tutor for Complex Decision Making. Proceedings in 34th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Sapporo, Japan: Cognitive Science Society.
14. Parise, R., Imbert, J-P., Marais, F., & Alonso, R. (2012). LABY: Un support d'aide à l'évaluation de choix conception d'IHM pour le contrôle aérien. Ergo'IHM Proceedings.
15. Rasmussen, J. (1983). Skills, Rules, and Knowledge; Signals, Signs, and Symbols, and Other Distinctions in Human Performance Models. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 13, 257-266.
16. Rasmussen, J., and Pejtersen., A. M., & Goodstein, L. P. (1994). Cognitive Systems Engineering. Wiley.
17. Tremblay, S., Vachon, F., Lafond, D., & Kramer, C. (2012). Dealing With Task Interruptions in Complex Dynamic Environments Are Two Heads Better Than One? Human Factors, 54, 70-83.
18. Vachon, F., Lafond, D., Vallières, B. R., Rousseau, R., & Tremblay, S. (2011). Supporting situation awareness: A tradeoff between benefits and overhead. In Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision Support (CogSIMA), 2011 IEEE First International Multi-Disciplinary Conference on (pp. 284-291).