Field dependent/independent cognitive style research revisited: Do field dependent readers read differently than field independent readers?

Reading Psychology

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 1984, Pages 303-322

  Rasinski, Timothy V ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84953037530     PISSN: 02702711     EISSN: 15210685     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0270271840050315     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Allington, R. L, Poor readers don’t get to read much in reading groups. Language Arts, 1980, 57, 872-875.
2. Annis, L. The effect of cognitive style and learning passage organization on study technique effectiveness. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, 1979. (ERIC Document No. ED 172 154).
3. Annis, L., & Davis, J.K. Study technique and cognitive style: Their effect on recall and recognition. Journal of Educational Research, 1978, 71, 175-178.
4. Barnes, G. M. The effects of training on field dependence/independence and the educational implications for the pre-school. The Australian Journal of Education, 1981, 25, 297-311.
5. Bell, M. S., & Gagne, E. D. Individual differences and the use of analogies in technical teixts, 1979. (ERIC Document No. ED 183 617).
6. Berlin, D. F., & Languis, M.L. Age and sex differences in measures of brain lateralization. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1980, 50, 959-967.
7. Bennink, C. D., & Spoelstra, T. Individual differences in field articulation as a factor in language comprehension. Journal of Research in Personality, 1979, 13, 480-489.
8. Blackman, S., & Goldstein, K. M. Cognitive styles and learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1982, 15, 106-115.
9. Blaha, J. Predicting reading and arithmetic achievement with measures of reading attitudes and cognitive styles. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1982, 55, 107-114.
10. Blaha, J., & Chomin, L. The relationship of reading attitudes to academic aptitude, locus of control, and field independence. Psychology in the Schools, 1982, 19. 28-32.
11. Brooks, L. W., Dansereau, D. F., & Spurlin, J. E. Instructing students on the use of headings as aids in processing scientific text. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Los Angeles, 1981. (ERIC Document No. ED 199 287).
12. Bruininks, R. H. Auditory and visual perceptual skills related to the reading performance of disadvantaged boys. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1969, 29, 179-186.
13. Canelos, J., & Taylor, W. The effects of a networking information processing strategy on the learning of field-dependents when receiving visual instructional information. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Association for Educational Communication and Technology, Philadelphia, 1981. (ERIC Document No. ED 207 493).
14. Carbo, M. Research in learning style and reading: Implications for instruction. Theory into Practice, 1984, 23, 72-76.
15. Carrier, C., Joseph, M. R., Krey, C. L., & LaCroix, P. Supplied visuals and imagery instruction in field independent and field dependent children’s recall. Educational Communication and Technology, 1983, 31, 153-160.
16. Christiansen, J. C., Annesley, F. R., & Scott, E. Relationship between cognitive style and the acquisition of meaning in content reading. Paper presented at the Eighth World Congress on Reading, Manila, 1980. (ERIC Document No. ED 200 915).
17. Clay, M. M. Reading: The Patterning of Complex Behaviour. Exeter, New Hampshire: Heinemann Educational Books, 1979.
18. Cohn, M. L. Field dependence-independence and reading comprehension. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York University, 1968.
19. Collins, J. Discourse style, classroom interaction and differential treatment. Journal of Reading Behavior, 1982, 14, 429-437.
20. Coop, R. H., & Sigel, I. E. Cognitive style: Implications for learning and instruction. Psychology in the Schools, 1971, 8, 152-161.
21. Cross, K. P. Accent on Learning. San Francisco:Jossey Bass, 1976.
22. Davey, B. Cognitive styles and reading achievement. Journal of Reading, 1976, 20, 113-120.
23. Davey, B. Cognitive styles and reading research: Some methodological concerns and future directions. Reading Psychology, 1983, 4, 65-77.
24. Davis, J. K., & Cochran, K. F. Toward an information processing analysis of field-independence. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, 1982. (ERIC Document No. ED 221 551).
25. Davis, J. K., & Frank, B. M. Learning and memory of field independent-dependent individuals. Journal of Research in Personality, 1979, 13, 469-479.
26. Doyle, W., & Rutherford, B. Classroom research on matching learning and teaching styles. Theory into Practice, 1984,’23, 20-25.
27. Dunn, B. R., & Gould, J. E. Cognitive style differences in expository prose recall, (technical report #210). Urbana-Champaign, Illinois:Center for the Study of Reading, 1981. (ERIC Document No. ED 205 922).
28. Fiebert, M. Cognitive styles in the deaf. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1967, 24, 319-329.
29. Garner, R. The importance of cognitive styles research for understanding reading processes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, 1979. (ERIC Document No. ED 172 148).
30. Gluck, E. Psychological differentiation and reading achievement in first grade children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston University, 1972.
31. Goodenough, D. R. The role of individual differences in field dependence as a factor in learning and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 1976, 83, 675-694.
32. Goodenough, D. R., & Witkin, H. A. Origins òf thè field-dependent and fi eld-independent cognitive styles. Unpublished research bulletin, Princeton, New Jersey:Educational Testing Service, 1977.
33. Guilford, J. P. Cognitive styles: What are they? Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1980, 40, 715-735.’
34. Guyer, B. L., & Friedman, M. P. Hemispheric processing and cognitive styles in learning disabled and normal children. Child Development, 1975, 46, 658-668.
35. Hepler, S. I., & Hickman, J. ’The book was okay. I love you’ - Social aspects of response to literature. Theory into Practice, 1982, 21, 278-283.
36. Lefever, M. M., & Ehri, L. C. The relationship between field independence and sentence disambiguation ability. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1976, 5, 99-106.
37. Letteri, C. A. Cognitive profile: Basic determinant of academic achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 1980, 73, 196-199.
38. Letteri, C. A. Teaching students how to learn: Cognitive profile analysis, augmentation, and transfer. Theory into Practice. (In press).
39. Lyons, C. A. The relationship of prospective teachers’ neural processing, cognitive style, and personality type to classroom learning and teaching behaviors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University, 1982.
40. Mahlios, M. C. Effects of teacher-student cognitive style on patterns of dyadic classroom interaction. Journal of Experimental Education, 1981, 49, 147-157.
41. Newsome, V. J. Field independence cognitive style and sentential disambiguation performance: Some relations between them. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, 1982.
42. Packer, J., & Bain, J. Cognitive style and teacher-student compatibility. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1978, 70 864-871.
43. Petersen, S. A., & Magaro, P. A. Reading and field dependence: A pilot study. Journal of Reading, 1969,12, 287-294.
44. Pierce, J. W. Field independence and imagery-assisted prose recall of children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1980, 72, 200-203.
45. Pitts, M. C., & Thompson, B. The influence of children’s cognitive styles on reading comprehension. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, Austin, Texas, 1982. (ERIC Document No. ED 223 996).
46. Pitts, M. C., & Thompson, B. Cognitive styles as mediating variables in inferential reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 1984, 19, 426-435.
47. Powers, J. E., & Lis, D. J. Field dependence-independence and performance with the passive transformation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1977, 45, 759-765.
48. Price, G. E., Dunn, R., & Sanders, W. Reading achievement and learning style characteristics. Clearing house, 1981, 54, 223-226.
49. Provost, G. L. Teaching strategies, modes of evaluation, and the field-dependence factor. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1981, 52, 163-173.
50. Readence, J. E., Baldwin, R. S., Bean, T. W., & Dishner, E. K. Field dependence-independence as a variable in cloze tests of performance. Journal of Reading Behavior, 1980,22, 65-67.
51. Renninger, K. A., & Snyder, S. Effects of cognitive style on perceived satisfaction and performance among students and teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1983, 75, 668-676.
52. Riding, R. J., & Boardman, D. J. The relationship between sex and learning style and graphicacy in 14-year-old children. Educational Review, 1983, 35, 69-79.
53. Riding, R. J., & Dyer, V. A. Extraversion, field-independence, and performance on cognitive tasks in twelve-year-old children. Research in Education, 1983, 29, 1-9.
54. Robeck, C. P. A study of cognitive style, knowledge of linguistic concepts, and reading achievement of first and third grade children. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the College Reading Association, Baltimore, 1980. (ERIC Document No. ED 204 743).
55. Roberge, J. J., & Flexer, B. K. Re-examination of the covariation of field independence, intelligence, and achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1981, 51, 235-236.
56. Rounds, S. Grammatical Awareness, Field Independence, and Reading Abi 1ity in Second Grade Children. 1979. (ERIC Document No. ED 216 315).
57. Ruble, D. N., & Nakamura, C. Y. Task orientation versus social orientation in young children and their attention to relevant social cues. Child Development, 1972, 43, 471-480.
58. Sabaroff, R. E., & Frary, R. B. Error analysis of test items with respect to cognitive style: Implications for teaching. Reading Improvement, 1978, 15, 215-225.
59. Satterly, D. J., & Telfer, I. G. Cognitive style and advance organizers in learning and retention. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1979, 49, 169-178.
60. Schwartz, E. N. The effect of field dependence - field independence upon the word recognition ability of second grade subjects. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Hofstra University, 1972.
61. Scott, E., & Annesley, F. R. Some implications of cognitive style for reading achievement, and curriculum design. Paper presented at the Sixth World Congress on Reading, Singapore, 1976. (ERIC Document No. ED 200 912).
62. Scott, E., Annesley, F. R., Maher, K., & Christiansen, J. Cognitive style and reading miscues in eighth graders. Paper presented at the Eighth World Congress on Reading, Manila, 1980. (ERIC Document No. ED 200 914).
63. Shimmerlik, S. M., & Nolan, J. D. Reorganization and the recall of prose. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1976, 68, 779-786.
64. Smith, E. R., & Standal, T. C. Learning styles and study techniques. Journal of Reading, 1981, 24, 599-602.
65. Spiro, R. J. Etiology of Reading Comprehension Style, (technical report #124). Urbana-Champaign: Center for the Study of Reading, 1979. (ERIC DocumentNo. ED 170 734).
66. Spiro, R. J., & Tirre, W.C. Individualdifferencesinschema utilization during discourse processing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1980, 72, 204-208.
67. Stanovich, K. E. Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 1980, 15, 32-71.
68. Stasz, C., Shavelson, R. J., Cox, D. L.,& Moore, C. A. Field independence and thestructuring ofknowledge in asocial studies minicourse. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1976, 68, 550-558.
69. Stuart, I. R. Perceptual style and reading ability: Implications for an instructional approach. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1967, 24, 135-138.
70. Thompson, B., & Pitts, M. C. Validity of teachers’ perceptions of children’s cognitive styles. Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance, 1981, 14, 90-95.
71. Watson, B. L. Field dependence and early reading achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California at Los Angeles, 1969.
72. Wilcox, W. C., Richards, B. F., & Merrill, M. D. Effects of text condensation, field independence, and sex on comprehension of prose materials, 1977. (ERIC Document No. ED 200 933)
73. Wineman, J. H. Cognitive style and reading ability. Caiifornia Journal of Educational Research, 1971, 22, 74-79.
74. Witkin, H. A., & Goodenough, D. R. Field dependence revisited. Unpublished research bulletin. Princeton, N.J.:Educational Testing Service, 1977.
75. Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., & Cox, P. W. Field-dependent and fi eld-independent cognitive styles and thei educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 1977 47, 1-64.
76. Witkin, H. A., Oltman, P. K., Raskin, E., & Karp, S. A. A Manual for the Embedded Figures Test. Palo Alto, Calif.:Consulting Psychologists Press, 1971.
77. Zuteil, J. Teacher informed response to reader miscues. Theory into Practice, 1977, 16, 384-391.