Economic value of flexible hydrogen-based polygeneration energy systems

Applied Energy

Volumn 164, Issue , 2016, Pages 857-870

  Farhat, Karim ^a   Reichelstein, Stefan ^b  

^a Stanford University   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Economic competitiveness; Flexible; Hydrogen; Levelized cost; Polygeneration; Real option value

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION; COSTS; ECONOMICS; FERTILIZERS; FOSSIL FUELS; PROFITABILITY;

ECONOMIC COMPETITIVENESS; FLEXIBLE; LEVELIZED COSTS; POLY-GENERATION; REAL OPTION VALUES;

HYDROGEN;

COMPETITIVENESS; FERTILIZER; FOSSIL FUEL; HYDROGEN; POWER GENERATION; PROFITABILITY; VALUATION;

CALIFORNIA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84952932766     PISSN: 03062619     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.12.008     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. BP. BP statistical review of world energy; June 2014. . http://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/about-bp/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy.html.
2. IEA. 2014 Key world energy statistics; 2014. . http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/KeyWorld2014.pdf.
3. Serra L.M., Lozano M.-A., Ramos J., Ensinas A.V., Nebra S.A. Polygeneration and efficient use of natural resources. Energy 2009, 34:575-586.
4. Nexant. Polygeneration from coal: integrated power, chemicals, and liquid fuels, nexant chem systems, white plains, New York; 2008.
5. Meerman J., Ramírez A., Turkenburg W., Faaij A. Performance of simulated flexible integrated gasification polygeneration facilities. Part A: A technical-energetic assessment. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2011, 15:2563-2587.
6. Liu P., Pistikopoulos E.N., Li Z. A multi-objective optimization approach to polygeneration energy systems design. AIChE J: Process Syst Eng 2010, 56(5).
7. Chen Y., Adams T.A., Barton a.P.I. Optimal design and operation of flexible energy polygeneration systems. Ind Eng Chem Res 2011, 50:4553-4566.
8. Meerman J., Ramirez A., Turkenburg W., Faaij A. Performance of simulated flexible integrated gasification polygeneration facilities, Part B: Economic valuation. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2012, 16:6083-6102.
9. H2Stations. Hydrogen filling stations worldwide; 2015. . http://www.netinform.net/H2/H2Stations/H2Stations.aspx?Continent=AF&StationID=-1.
10. Baker DR. Hydrogen-fueled cars face uncertain market in California; 2014. [Accessed 2015]. http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Hydrogen-fueled-cars-face-uncertain-market-in-5519890.php.
11. Bromaghim G, Gibeault K, Serfass J, Serfass P, Wagner E. Hydrogen and fuel cells: the US market report. National Hydrogen Association, Washington DC, USA; 2010.
12. Calise F., Cipollina A., d'Accadia M.D., Piacentino A. A novel renewable polygeneration system for a small Mediterranean volcanic island for the combined production of energy and water: dynamic simulation and economic assessment. Appl Energy 2014, 135:675-693.
13. Rubio-Maya C., Uche-Marcuello J., Martínez-Gracia A., Bayod-Rújula A.A. Design optimization of a polygeneration plant fuelled by natural gas and renewable energy sources. Appl Energy 2011, 88:449-457.
14. Pellegrini L.A., Soave G., Gamba S., Langè S. Economic analysis of a combined energy-methanol production plant. Appl Energy 2011, 88:4891-4897.
15. Li S., Gao L., Zhang X., Lin H., Jin H. Evaluation of cost reduction potential for a coal based polygeneration system with CO2 capture. Energy 2012, 45:101-106.
16. Hu L., Hongguang J., Lin G., Wei H. Techno-economic evaluation of coal-based polygeneration systems of synthetic. Energy Convers Management 2011, 52:274-283.
17. Narvaez A., Chadwick D., Kershenbaum L. Small-medium scale polygeneration systems: methanol and power production. Appl Energy 2014, 113:1109-1117.
18. Ng K.S., Zhang N., Sadhukhan J. Techno-economic analysis of polygeneration systems with carbon capture and storage and CO2 reuse. Chem Eng J 2013, 219:96-108.
19. Cormos C.-C. Assessment of flexible energy vectors poly-generation based on coal and biomass/solid wastes co-gasification with carbon capture. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2013, 7855-7866.
20. Liu P., Gerogiorgis D.I., Pistikopoulos E.N. Modeling and optimization of polygeneration energy systems. Catal Today 2007, 127:347-359.
21. Ramsden T, Ruth M, Diakov V, Laffen M, Timbario T. Hydrogen pathways: updated cost, well-to-wheels energy use, and emissions for the current technology status of ten hydrogen production, delivery, and distribution scenarios. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado, USA; 2013.
22. Ramsden T, Steward D, Zuboy J. Analyzing the levelized cost of centralized and distributed hydrogen production using the H2A production model, version 2. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado, USA; 2009.
23. MIT. The future of coal. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston; 2007.
24. Reichelstein S., Yorston M. The prospects for cost competitive solar PV power. Energy Policy 2012, 55:117-127.
25. Reichelstein S., Rohlfing-Bastian A. Levelized product cost: concept and decision relevance. Account Rev 2015, 90(4).
26. Lerdal M. Hydrogen energy California, low-carbon solutions for California, energy seminar. Stanford University, Stanford, California; 2012.
27. GE Energy. Heavy duty gas turbine products; 2009. [Accessed 2014]. http://www.ge-energy.com/content/multimedia/_files/downloads/GEH12985H.pdf.
28. Wick J. Advanced gas turbine technology GT26. Alstom, Jornada Tecnológica in Madrid, Madrid; 2006.
29. CAISO. Open access same-time information system (OASIS); 2012. . http://oasis.caiso.com.
30. IndexMundi. Urea monthly price - US dollars per metric ton; 2015. [Accessed 2015]. http://www.indexmundi.com/commodities/?commodity=urea&months=120.
31. HECA. The project; 2010. [Accessed 2014]. http://hydrogenenergycalifornia.com/the-project.
32. HECA. Project fact sheet; 2010. [Accessed 2013]. http://hydrogenenergycalifornia.com/factsheets.
33. URS. Responses to CEC workshop requests: nos. a1 through a32. Amended application for certification HYDROGEN ENERGY CALIFORNIA (08-AFC-8A). Kern County, California, California Energy Commission, Sacramento, California; 2012.
34. CEC. Hydrogen energy California project. Preliminary staff assessment, draft environmental impact statement, US Department of Energy and California Energy Commission, Sacramento, California; 2013.
35. URS. Responses to sierra club data requests set three: nos. 132 through 146. Amended application for certification for HYDROGEN ENERGY CALIFORNIA (08-AFC-8A). Kern County, California, California Energy Commission; 2013.
36. IEA GHG. Co-production of hydrogen and electricity by coal gasification with CO2 capture - updated economic analysis. International energy agency greenhouse gas R&D programme; 2008.
37. Bartels JR. A feasibility study of implementing an ammonia economy. Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa; 2008.
38. Leighty B. Energy storage with anhydrous ammonia: comparison with other energy storage. In: Ammonia: the key to US energy independence. Minneapolis; 2008.
39. Morgan ER. Techno-economic feasibility study of ammonia plants powered by offshore wind. University of Massachusetts - Amherst; 2013.
40. Lennon D. Refurbishing used plants. Relocating nitrogenous fertilizer plants, capital plant international.
41. Damas C. Terra nitrogen or CVR partners: fertilizer production capability; 21 October 2011. . http://seekingalpha.com/article/301165-terra-nitrogen-or-cvr-partners-fertilizer-production-capability.
42. Rubin E., Booras G., Davison J., Ekstrom C., Matuszewski M., McCoy S., et al. Toward a common method for cost estimation for CO2 capture and storage at fossil fuel power plants 2013, Global CCS Institute.
43. Borenstein S. The private and public economics of renewable electricity generation. J Econ Perspect 2012, 67-92.
44. Abellera C., Short C. The costs of CCS and other low-carbon technologies 2011, Global CCS Institute.
45. Reichelstein S., Sahoo A. Time of day pricing and the levelized cost of intermittent power generation. Energy Econom 2015, 48:97-108.
46. Marsden J.E. Elementary classical analysis 1974, W.H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco.