Impacts of carbon pricing, brown coal availability and gas cost on Czech energy system up to 2050

Energy

Volumn 108, Issue , 2016, Pages 19-33

  Recka L ^a   Scasny M ^a  

^a CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Ancillary benefits; Climate change mitigation; Czech Republic; Energy system optimization; Environmental benefits; TIMES model

Indexed keywords

AIR QUALITY; AVAILABILITY; CARBON; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBONIZATION; CLIMATE CHANGE; CLIMATE MODELS; COAL; COAL MINES; ECOLOGY; EMISSION CONTROL; FOSSIL FUELS; FUELS; LIGNITE; NATURAL GAS; RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES;

ANCILLARY BENEFITS; CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION; CZECH REPUBLIC; ENERGY SYSTEM OPTIMIZATIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS; TIMES MODELING;

COSTS;

AIR QUALITY; CARBON EMISSION; CLIMATE CHANGE; COAL MINING; ELECTRICITY GENERATION; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; EQUILIBRIUM LINE; EUROPEAN UNION; LIGNITE; MITIGATION; NATURAL GAS; OPTIMIZATION; PRICE DYNAMICS; RENEWABLE RESOURCE;

CZECH REPUBLIC;

EID: 84952908490     PISSN: 03605442     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.12.003     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. [1] Ürge-Vorsatz, D., Miladinova, G., Paizs, L., Energy in transition: from the iron curtain to the European Union. Energy Policy 34 (2006), 2279–2297, 10.1016/j.enpol.2005.03.007.
2. [2] Van Wees, M., Uyterlinde, M., Maly, M., Energy efficiency and renewable energy policy in the Czech Republic within the framework of accession to the European Union. Energy 27 (2002), 1057–1067, 10.1016/S0360-5442(02)00068-3.
3. [3] Markandya, A., Pedroso-Galinato, S., Streimikiene, D., Energy intensity in transition economies: Is there convergence towards the EU average?. Energy Econ 28 (2006), 121–145, 10.1016/j.eneco.2005.10.005.
4. [4] EEA, Energy support measures and their impact on innovation in the renewable energy sector in Europe. 2014, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
5. [5] Ščasný, M., Tsuchimoto Menkyna, F., Index-based decomposition of SO2, NOx, CO and PM emissions stemming from stationary emission sources in Czech Republic over 1997-2007. Costantini, V., Mazzanti, M., Montini, A., (eds.) London, 2012, Routledge, New York, 203–231 Hybrid Econ. accounts. Routledge.
6. [6] Máca, V., Melichar, J., Ščasný, M., Internalization of external costs of energy generation in central and Eastern European countries. Spec issue exp with environ taxation. J Environ Dev 21 (2012), 181–197.
7. [7] European Council, Conclusions of European Council on 2030 climate and energy policy framework. 2014.
8. [8] European Commission, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: a Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050. Brussels, 2011.
9. [9] Ščasný, M., Máca, V., Melichar, J., Rečka, L., Kvantifikace environmentálních a zdravotních dopadů (externích nákladů) z povrchové těžby hnědého uhlí v Severočeské hnědouhelné pánvi v těžebních lokalitách velkolomů Bílina a ČSA a využití vydobytého hnědého uhlí ve spalovacích procesech pro výrobu elek. 2015.
10. [10] Parliament of the Czech Republic, Act No. 165/2012 Coll. on supported energy sources (as amended). Czech Repub, 2012.
11. [11] Preiss, P., Friedrich, R., Klotz, V., Report on the procedure and data to generate averaged/aggregated data. vol. Project re, 2008.
12. [12] Weinzettel, J., Havránek, M., Ščasný, M., A consumption-based indicator of the external costs of electricity. Ecol Indic 17 (2012), 68–76, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.035.
13. [13] Ščasný, M., Massetti, E., Melichar, J., Carrara, S., Quantifying the ancillary benefits of the representative concentration pathways on air quality in Europe. Environ Resour Econ 62:2 (2015), 383–415.
14. [14] International Energy Agency Energy Policies of IEA Countries – Czech Republic 2010 Review, 2010.
15. [15] Eurostat, Energy balance sheets – 2013 data. 2015, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 10.2785/388553 2015 editi.
16. [16] MPO, Analýza potřeby dodávek hnědého uhlí pro teplárenství s ohledem na navržené varianty úpravy územně - ekologických limitů těžby. 2015 Prague.
17. [17] CEZ Group. Fossil power plants 2012. http://www.cez.cz/en/power-plants-and-environment/coal-fired-power-plants.html (accessed 11.09.15).
18. [18] Průša, J., Klimešová, A., Janda, K., Consumer loss in Czech photovoltaic power plants in 2010–2011. Energy Policy 63 (2013), 747–755, 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.08.023.
19. [19] MPO, State energy policy [Státní energetická koncepce]. Prague, 2015.
20. [20] Institute of Atmospheric Physics ASCR, The updated estimate of realizable potential wind energy from the perspective of 2012 (Aktualizovaný odhad realizovatelného potenciálu větrné energie z perspektivy roku 2012). Prague, 2012.
21. [21] Eurostat. Supply, transformation and consumption of electricity - annual data [nrg_105a] 2015. http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=nrg_105a&lang=en (accessed 03.11.15).
22. [22] Loulou, R., Remne, U., Kanudia, A., Lehtilä, A., Goldstein, G., Documentation for the TIMES Model PART I. 2005.
23. [23] Loulou, R., Remne, U., Kanudia, A., Lehtilä, A., Goldstein, G., Documentation for the TIMES Model PART II. 2005.
24. [24] Loulou, R., Remne, U., Kanudia, A., Lehtilä, A., Goldstein, G., Documentation for the TIMES Model PART III. 2005.
25. [25] Timmerman, J., Vandevelde, L., Van Eetvelde, G., Towards low carbon business park energy systems: classification of techno-economic energy models. Energy 75 (2014), 68–80, 10.1016/j.energy.2014.05.092.
26. [26] Loulou, R., Goldstein, G., Noble, K., Documentation for the MARKAL family of models. 2004.
27. [27] Drouet, L., Thénié, J., An energy-technology-environment model to assess urban sustainable development policies – reference manual. 2009.
28. [28] Howells, M., Rogner, H., Strachan, N., Heaps, C., Huntington, H., Kypreos, S., et al. OSeMOSYS: the open source energy modeling system. Energy Policy 39 (2011), 5850–5870, 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.06.033.
29. [29] ERÚ, Yearly report on the operation of the Czech electricity Grid for 2012. Prague, 2013.
30. [30] Ueckerdt, F., Brecha, R., Luderer, G., Analyzing major challenges of wind and solar variability in power systems. Renew Energy 81 (2015), 1–10, 10.1016/j.renene.2015.03.002.
31. [31] Hirst, E., Hild, J., The value of wind energy as a function of wind capacity. Electr J 17 (2004), 11–20, 10.1016/j.tej.2004.04.010.
32. [32] Hirth, L., The market value of variable renewables. Energy Econ 38 (2013), 218–236, 10.1016/j.eneco.2013.02.004.
33. [33] ČEPS. Total gross electricity generation within the Czech power system according to individual power plant type 2014. https://www.ceps.cz/ENG/Data/Vsechna-data/Pages/Vyroba.aspx (accessed 15.11.14).
34. [34] Schröder, A., Kunz, F., Meiss, J., Mendelevitch, R., Von, Hirschhausen C., Current and prospective costs of electricity generation until 2050. 2013.
35. [35] IEA, World Energy Outlook. 2014, IEA PUBLICATIONS, Paris 2014.
36. [36] European Climate Foundation Roadmap 2050, A practical guide to a prosperous, low- carbon Europe Volume I: technical and economic assesment. 2010.
37. [37] Gavor J. Comparison of energy commodity price trends (Srovnání cenových trendů energetických komodit). TZB-Info 2013. http://energetika.tzb-info.cz/9895-srovnani-cenovych-trendu-energetickych-komodit (accessed 12.09.14).
38. [38] Schröder, A., Traber, T., Kemfert, C., Market driven power plant investment perspectives in Europe: climate policy and technology scenarios until 2050 in the model Emelie-Esy. Clim Chang Econ, 04, 2013, 1340007, 10.1142/S2010007813400071.
39. [39] Neuhoff, K., Acworth, W., Betz, R., Burtraw, D., Cludius, J., Fell, H., et al. Is a market stability reserve likely to improve the functioning of the EU ETS?. | Clim Strateg, 2015 http://climatestrategies.org/publication/is-a-market-stability-reserve/.
40. [40] Wang, Q., Chen, X., Jha, A.N., Rogers, H., Natural gas from shale formation – the evolution, evidences and challenges of shale gas revolution in United States. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 30 (2014), 1–28, 10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.065.
41. [41] Gracceva, F., Zeniewski, P., Exploring the uncertainty around potential shale gas development – a global energy system analysis based on TIAM (TIMES integrated assessment model). Energy 57 (2013), 443–457, 10.1016/j.energy.2013.06.006.
42. [42] Department of Energy & Climate Change, Updated short-term traded carbon values used for UK policy appraisal. London, 2014.
43. [43] Tol, R.S.J., Targets for global climate policy: an overview. J Econ Dyn Control 37 (2013), 911–928, 10.1016/j.jedc.2013.01.001.
44. [44] Kiuila, O., Markandya, A., Ščasný, M., Tsuchimoto Menkyna, F., The economic and environmental effects of taxing air pollutants and CO2: lessons from a study of the Czech Republic. 2015 MPRA Paper 66599, University Library of Munich, Germany.
45. [45] Rečka, L., Ščasný, M., Environmental Regulation Impacts on the Czech Power System by the Dynamic Linear Optimisation Model Message (Analýza dopadů regulace v českém elektroenergetickém systému–aplikace dynamického lineárního modelu Message). Polit Ekon 2013 (2013), 248–273.
46. [46] EEA, Trends and projections in Europe 2014. Tracking progress towards Europe's climate and energy targets for 2020. 2014, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
47. [47] Merkel, E., Fehrenbach, D., McKenna, R., Fichtner, W., Modelling decentralised heat supply: an application and methodological extension in TIMES. Energy 73 (2014), 592–605, 10.1016/j.energy.2014.06.060.
48. [48] Keppo, I., Strubegger, M., Short term decisions for long term problems – the effect of foresight on model based energy systems analysis. Energy 35 (2010), 2033–2042, 10.1016/j.energy.2010.01.019.
49. [49] Lohwasser, R., Madlener, R., Economics of CCS for coal plants: Impact of investment costs and efficiency on market diffusion in Europe. Energy Econ 34 (2012), 850–863, 10.1016/j.eneco.2011.07.030.
50. [50] European Commission, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: a policy framework for climate and energy in the period from 2020 to 2030. 2014 Brussels.
51. [51] Capros, P., Paroussos, L., Fragkos, P., Tsani, S., Boitier, B., Wagner, F., et al. European decarbonisation pathways under alternative technological and policy choices: a multi-model analysis. Energy Strateg Rev 2 (2014), 231–245, 10.1016/j.esr.2013.12.007.
52. [52] Blesl, M., Kober, T., Bruchof, D., Kuder, R., Effects of climate and energy policy related measures and targets on the future structure of the European energy system in 2020 and beyond. Energy Policy 38 (2010), 6278–6292, 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.06.018.
53. [53] EC, Energy Roadmap 2050, Impact assessment and scenario Analyses. Documentation available at, 2011 https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/roadmap2050_ia_20120430_en_0.pdf.
54. [54] Bussar, C., Moos, M., Alvarez, R., Wolf, P., Thien, T., Chen, H., et al. Optimal allocation and capacity of energy storage systems in a future European power system with 100% renewable energy generation. Energy Procedia 46 (2014), 40–47, 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.01.156.
55. [55] Spiecker, S., Weber, C., The future of the European electricity system and the impact of fluctuating renewable energy – a scenario analysis. Energy Policy 65 (2014), 185–197, 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.032.
56. [56] Dowling, P., The impact of climate change on the European energy system. Energy Policy 60 (2013), 406–417, 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.093.
57. [57] Amorim, F., Pina, A., Gerbelová, H., Pereira da Silva, P., Vasconcelos, J., Martins, V., Electricity decarbonisation pathways for 2050 in Portugal: a TIMES (The integrated MARKAL-EFOM system) based approach in closed versus open systems modelling. Energy 69 (2014), 104–112, 10.1016/j.energy.2014.01.052.
58. [58] Gerbelová, H., Amorim, F., Pina, A., Melo, M., Ioakimidis, C., Ferrão, P., Potential of CO2(carbon dioxide) taxes as a policy measure towards low-carbon Portuguese electricity sector by 2050. Energy 69 (2014), 113–119, 10.1016/j.energy.2014.01.011.
59. [59] Rosenberg, E., Lind, A., Espegren, K.A., The impact of future energy demand on renewable energy production – case of Norway. Energy 61 (2013), 419–431, 10.1016/j.energy.2013.08.044.
60. [60] Sáfián, F., Modelling the Hungarian energy system – the first step towards sustainable energy planning. Energy 69 (2014), 58–66, 10.1016/j.energy.2014.02.067.
61. [61] MPO, State energy policy of the Czech Republic (Státní energetická koncepce). 2004 Prague.
62. [62] McKenna, R., Hollnaicher, S., Ostman v. d. Leye P, Fichtner, W., Cost-potentials for large onshore wind turbines in Europe. Energy 83 (2015), 217–229, 10.1016/j.energy.2015.02.016.
63. [63] ERÚ, Yearly report on the operation of the Czech electricity Grid 2014. Prague, 2015.
64. [64] IAEA. Nuclear share of electricity generation in 2014. Power React Inf Syst 2015. https://www.iaea.org/PRIS/WorldStatistics/NuclearShareofElectricityGeneration.aspx (accessed September 8, 2015).
65. [65] Knopf, B., Nahmmacher, P., Schmid, E., The European renewable energy target for 2030 – an impact assessment of the electricity sector. Energy Policy 85 (2015), 50–60, 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.05.010.
66. [66] Stocks, K.J., Discount rate for technology assessment. Energy Econ 6 (1984), 177–185, 10.1016/0140-9883(84)90014-8.
67. [67] Ministry of Finance of the Czech Republic. Results of the first open call within the programme CZ08 – “Pilot studies and surveys on CCS technology.” Norw Grants 2009-2014 2015. http://www.eeagrants.cz/en/programmes/norway-grants-2009-2014/cz08-carbon-capture-and-storage/cz08-news/2015/results-of-the-first-open-call-within-th-1775 (accessed February 22, 2015).