The fragmentation of intermediary liability in the UK

Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice

Volumn 8, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 521-531

  Mac Síthigh, Daithí ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84952902452     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17471540     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jiplp/jpt094     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. Lilian Edwards 'The fall and rise of intermediary liability online' in Lilian Edwards and Charlotte Waelde (eds) Law and the Internet (3rd edn Hart Publishing Oxford 2009)
2. Christopher T Marsden 'Internet service providers: content liability, control, and neutrality' in Ian Walden (ed) Telecommunications Law and Regulation (4th edn OUP New York 2012) 701, 703-11.
3. Jennifer M Urban and Laura Quilter 'Efficient Process or "Chilling Effects"? Takedown Notices Under Section 512 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act' (2006) 4 Santa Clara Computer and High Technology Law Journal 621.
4. European Commission 'Online services, including e-commerce, in the Single Market' SEC(2011) 1641, 47.
5. Case C-70/10 Scarlet Extended v SABAM, 24 November 2011
6. Case C-324/09 L'Oréal v eBay, 12 July 2011.
7. T J McIntyre 'Child Abuse Images and Cleanfeeds: Assessing Internet Blocking Systems' in Ian Brown (ed), Research Handbook on Governance of the Internet (Edward Elgar Cheltenham 2013) 277, 282-3
8. Emily B Laidlaw 'The Responsibilities of Free Speech Regulators: An Analysis of the Internet Watch Foundation' (2012) 20 International Journal of Law and Information Technology 312, 316-317, 319-320
9. Dan Worth 'Motion Picture Association asks Virgin and TalkTalk to block Newzbin 2' (V3, 9 November 2011). Available at http://www.v3.co.uk/v3-uk/news/2123843/virgin-talktalk-hit-newzbin-blocking-request-mpa.
10. R (BT) v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation & Skills [2011] EWHC 1021 (Admin).
11. Ofcom '"Site blocking" to reduce online copyright infringement: a review of section 17 & 18 of the Digital Economy Act' (27 May 2010). Available at http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/internet/site-blocking.pdf.
12. Intellectual Property Office 'Sweeping intellectual property reforms to boost growth and add billions to the UK economy' (press release, 3 August 2011). Available at http://www.ipo.gov.uk/about/press/press-release/pressrelease-2011/press-release-20110803.htm.
13. Department for Culture, Media & Sport, 'Measures to tackle Internet piracy moved forward today' (press release, 26 June 2012). Available at https://www.gov.uk/government/news/next-steps-to-tackle-internet-piracy.
14. Daithí MacSíthigh 'Law in the last mile: sharing Internet access through wi-fi' (2009) 6 SCRIP Ted 355, 366-8.
15. Ofcom 'New measures to protect online copyright and inform consumers' (press release, 26 June 2012). Available at http://media.ofcom.org.uk/2012/06/26/new-measures-to-protect-online-copyright-and-inform-consumers/
16. Ofcom 'Online Infringement of Copyright and the Digital Economy Act 2010-Notice of Ofcom's proposal to make by order a code for regulating the initial obligations' (26 June 2012). Available at http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/consultations/infringement-notice/.
17. D Bainbridge, Intellecutal property (9th ed, 2012) 199.
18. Godwin Busuttil 'The Internet and injunctions' Conference paper, 5RB Annual Conference, 27 September 2012, 6
19. L'Oréal v eBay [2009] EWHC 1094 (Ch) paras 447-54.
20. Enrico Bonadio and Mauro Santo 'ISPs cannot be ordered to adopt general and preventive filtering systems' (2012) 7 JIPLP 234.
21. RFU v Viagogo [2011] EWCA Civ 1585.
22. Copland v UK (2007) 45 EHRR 37 [41].
23. Matthew Collins, The Law of Defamation and the Internet (3rd edn OUP Oxford 2010) para 16.68.
24. Tamiz v Google [2013] EWCA Civ 68 ['Tamiz (CA)'] [52].
25. Mark Warby, Nicole Moreham and Iain Christie (eds) Tugendhat and Christie: The Law of Privacy and the Media (2nd edn OUP Oxford 2011), para 8.97.
26. Ministry of Justice, Government response to the report of the Joint Committee on the Draft Defamation Bill (Cm 8295, 2012), paras 85-88.
27. A v Google NZ [2012] NZHC 2352, para 74.
28. Trkulja v Google (No 5) [2012] VSC 533, para 27
29. Kok Yew Gary CHAN 'Defamation via hyperlinks: more than meets the eye' (2012) 128 LQR 346, 348.
30. Yildirim v Turkey App no 3111/10 (ECtHR, 18 December 2012).