메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 154-156

Bibliometric characteristics of systematic reviews in dermatology: A cross-sectional study through Web of Science and Scopus

Author keywords

evidence based dermatology; systematic reviews

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATOPIC DERMATITIS; BIBLIOMETRICS; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; COCHRANE LIBRARY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; CUTANEOUS MELANOMA; DERMATOLOGY; DRUG ERUPTION; HUMAN; JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR; NON MELANOMA SKIN CANCER; PSORIASIS; SCOPUS; SKIN INFECTION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC); WEB OF SCIENCE;

EID: 84952874585     PISSN: 10278117     EISSN: 2223330X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsi.2014.12.007     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (17)

References (10)
  • 1
    • 84856865636 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The growth of clinical trials and systematic reviews in informing dermatological patient care
    • H.C. Williams, and R.P. Dellavalle The growth of clinical trials and systematic reviews in informing dermatological patient care J Invest Dermatol 132 2012 1008 1017
    • (2012) J Invest Dermatol , vol.132 , pp. 1008-1017
    • Williams, H.C.1    Dellavalle, R.P.2
  • 2
    • 70149091772 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals
    • A.V. Kulkarni, B. Aziz, I. Shams, and J.W. Busse Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals JAMA 302 2009 1092 1096
    • (2009) JAMA , vol.302 , pp. 1092-1096
    • Kulkarni, A.V.1    Aziz, B.2    Shams, I.3    Busse, J.W.4
  • 3
    • 84862806604 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Survey of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in ophthalmology
    • H. Chen, and V. Jhanji Survey of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in ophthalmology Br J Ophthalmol 96 2012 896 899
    • (2012) Br J Ophthalmol , vol.96 , pp. 896-899
    • Chen, H.1    Jhanji, V.2
  • 4
  • 5
    • 77955171857 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement
    • D. Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, and et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement Int J Surg 8 2010 336 341
    • (2010) Int J Surg , vol.8 , pp. 336-341
    • Moher, D.1    Liberati, A.2    Tetzlaff, J.3
  • 6
    • 0033396997 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Quality-assessed reviews of health care interventions and the database of abstracts of reviews of effectiveness (DARE): NHS CRD review, dissemination, and information teams
    • M. Petticrew, F. Song, P. Wilson, and K. Wright Quality-assessed reviews of health care interventions and the database of abstracts of reviews of effectiveness (DARE): NHS CRD review, dissemination, and information teams Int J Technol Assess Health Care 15 1999 671 678
    • (1999) Int J Technol Assess Health Care , vol.15 , pp. 671-678
    • Petticrew, M.1    Song, F.2    Wilson, P.3    Wright, K.4
  • 7
    • 84902536354 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Systematic reviews published in higher impact clinical journals were of higher quality
    • P.S. Fleming, D. Koletsi, J. Seehra, and N. Pandis Systematic reviews published in higher impact clinical journals were of higher quality J Clin Epidemiol 67 2014 754 759
    • (2014) J Clin Epidemiol , vol.67 , pp. 754-759
    • Fleming, P.S.1    Koletsi, D.2    Seehra, J.3    Pandis, N.4
  • 8
    • 84884597202 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Usefulness of Cochrane Skin Group reviews for clinical practice
    • P. Davila-Seijo, A. Batalla, and I. Garcia-Doval Usefulness of Cochrane Skin Group reviews for clinical practice Actas Dermosifiliogr 104 2013 679 684
    • (2013) Actas Dermosifiliogr , vol.104 , pp. 679-684
    • Davila-Seijo, P.1    Batalla, A.2    Garcia-Doval, I.3
  • 9
    • 1642345066 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • What is the point of databases of reviews for dermatology if all they compile is "insufficient evidence"?
    • E.R. Parker, L.M. Schilling, V. Diba, H.C. Williams, and R.P. Dellavalle What is the point of databases of reviews for dermatology if all they compile is "insufficient evidence"? J Am Acad Dermatol 50 2004 635 639
    • (2004) J Am Acad Dermatol , vol.50 , pp. 635-639
    • Parker, E.R.1    Schilling, L.M.2    Diba, V.3    Williams, H.C.4    Dellavalle, R.P.5
  • 10
    • 33750921286 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Cochrane Skin Group systematic reviews are more methodologically rigorous than other systematic reviews in dermatology
    • A. Collier, L. Heilig, L. Schilling, H. Williams, and R.P. Dellavalle Cochrane Skin Group systematic reviews are more methodologically rigorous than other systematic reviews in dermatology Br J Dermatol 155 2006 1230 1235
    • (2006) Br J Dermatol , vol.155 , pp. 1230-1235
    • Collier, A.1    Heilig, L.2    Schilling, L.3    Williams, H.4    Dellavalle, R.P.5


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.