-
1
-
-
84856865636
-
The growth of clinical trials and systematic reviews in informing dermatological patient care
-
H.C. Williams, and R.P. Dellavalle The growth of clinical trials and systematic reviews in informing dermatological patient care J Invest Dermatol 132 2012 1008 1017
-
(2012)
J Invest Dermatol
, vol.132
, pp. 1008-1017
-
-
Williams, H.C.1
Dellavalle, R.P.2
-
2
-
-
70149091772
-
Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals
-
A.V. Kulkarni, B. Aziz, I. Shams, and J.W. Busse Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals JAMA 302 2009 1092 1096
-
(2009)
JAMA
, vol.302
, pp. 1092-1096
-
-
Kulkarni, A.V.1
Aziz, B.2
Shams, I.3
Busse, J.W.4
-
3
-
-
84862806604
-
Survey of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in ophthalmology
-
H. Chen, and V. Jhanji Survey of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in ophthalmology Br J Ophthalmol 96 2012 896 899
-
(2012)
Br J Ophthalmol
, vol.96
, pp. 896-899
-
-
Chen, H.1
Jhanji, V.2
-
4
-
-
33947684405
-
Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews
-
D. Moher, J. Tetzlaff, A.C. Tricco, M. Sampson, and D.G. Altman Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews PLoS Med 4 2007 e78
-
(2007)
PLoS Med
, vol.4
, pp. e78
-
-
Moher, D.1
Tetzlaff, J.2
Tricco, A.C.3
Sampson, M.4
Altman, D.G.5
-
5
-
-
77955171857
-
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement
-
D. Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, and et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement Int J Surg 8 2010 336 341
-
(2010)
Int J Surg
, vol.8
, pp. 336-341
-
-
Moher, D.1
Liberati, A.2
Tetzlaff, J.3
-
6
-
-
0033396997
-
Quality-assessed reviews of health care interventions and the database of abstracts of reviews of effectiveness (DARE): NHS CRD review, dissemination, and information teams
-
M. Petticrew, F. Song, P. Wilson, and K. Wright Quality-assessed reviews of health care interventions and the database of abstracts of reviews of effectiveness (DARE): NHS CRD review, dissemination, and information teams Int J Technol Assess Health Care 15 1999 671 678
-
(1999)
Int J Technol Assess Health Care
, vol.15
, pp. 671-678
-
-
Petticrew, M.1
Song, F.2
Wilson, P.3
Wright, K.4
-
7
-
-
84902536354
-
Systematic reviews published in higher impact clinical journals were of higher quality
-
P.S. Fleming, D. Koletsi, J. Seehra, and N. Pandis Systematic reviews published in higher impact clinical journals were of higher quality J Clin Epidemiol 67 2014 754 759
-
(2014)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.67
, pp. 754-759
-
-
Fleming, P.S.1
Koletsi, D.2
Seehra, J.3
Pandis, N.4
-
9
-
-
1642345066
-
What is the point of databases of reviews for dermatology if all they compile is "insufficient evidence"?
-
E.R. Parker, L.M. Schilling, V. Diba, H.C. Williams, and R.P. Dellavalle What is the point of databases of reviews for dermatology if all they compile is "insufficient evidence"? J Am Acad Dermatol 50 2004 635 639
-
(2004)
J Am Acad Dermatol
, vol.50
, pp. 635-639
-
-
Parker, E.R.1
Schilling, L.M.2
Diba, V.3
Williams, H.C.4
Dellavalle, R.P.5
-
10
-
-
33750921286
-
Cochrane Skin Group systematic reviews are more methodologically rigorous than other systematic reviews in dermatology
-
A. Collier, L. Heilig, L. Schilling, H. Williams, and R.P. Dellavalle Cochrane Skin Group systematic reviews are more methodologically rigorous than other systematic reviews in dermatology Br J Dermatol 155 2006 1230 1235
-
(2006)
Br J Dermatol
, vol.155
, pp. 1230-1235
-
-
Collier, A.1
Heilig, L.2
Schilling, L.3
Williams, H.4
Dellavalle, R.P.5
|