Feasibility of Using Electronic Medical Record Data for Tracking Quality Indicators in Adults with Congenital Heart Disease

Congenital Heart Disease

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 2015, Pages E268-E277

  Broberg, Craig ^a   Sklenar, Jiri ^a   Burchill, Luke ^a   Daniels, Curt ^b,c   Marelli, Arianne ^f   Gurvitz, Michelle ^d,e  

^a OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NATIONWIDE CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d BOSTON CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^e BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^f MCGILL UNIVERSITY HEALTH CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Adult congenital heart disease; Electronic medical record; Quality indicators

Indexed keywords

ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL; ADULT; AORTA COARCTATION; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; EISENMENGER COMPLEX; ELECTROCARDIOGRAM; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; FALLOT TETRALOGY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FONTAN PROCEDURE; GREAT VESSELS TRANSPOSITION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEART ATRIUM SEPTUM DEFECT; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LABORATORY TEST; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; CLINICAL TRIAL; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HEART DEFECTS, CONGENITAL; INCIDENCE; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARDS; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION;

ADULT; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HEART DEFECTS, CONGENITAL; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MALE; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; QUALITY INDICATORS, HEALTH CARE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84952870078     PISSN: 1747079X     EISSN: 17470803     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/chd.12289     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Baumgartner H, Bonhoeffer P, De Groot NM, etal. ESC Guidelines for the management of grown-up congenital heart disease (new version 2010). Eur Heart J. 2010;31:2915-2957.
2. Silversides CK, Marelli A, Beauchesne L, etal. Canadian Cardiovascular Society 2009 Consensus Conference on the management of adults with congenital heart disease: executive summary. Can J Cardiol. 2010;26:143-150.
3. Warnes CA, Williams RG, Bashore TM, etal. ACC/AHA 2008 Guidelines for the Management of Adults with Congenital Heart Disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing committee to develop guidelines for the management of adults with congenital heart disease). Circulation. 2008;118:2395-2451.
4. Gurvitz M, Marelli A, Mangione-Smith R, Jenkins K. Building quality indicators to improve care for adults with congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:2244-2253.
5. Frederick MA, Singh T, Salami S, Oetgen WJ, Rosman HS. First steps: exploring use of a prospective, office-based registry as the foundation for quality improvement in cardiology training. J Grad Med Educ. 2013;5:694-699.
6. Broberg CS, Mitchell J, Rehel S, etal. Electronic medical record integration with a database for adult congenital heart disease: Early experience and progress in automating multicenter data collection. Int J Cardiol. 2015;196:178-182.
7. Broberg C, McLarry J, Mitchell J, etal. Accuracy of administrative data for detection and categorization of adult congenital heart disease patients from an electronic medical record. Pediatr Cardiol. 2015;36:719-725.
8. Strickland MJ, Riehle-Colarusso TJ, Jacobs JP, etal. The importance of nomenclature for congenital cardiac disease: implications for research and evaluation. Cardiol Young. 2008;18(Suppl. 2):92-100.
9. May DC, Fiocchi F, Kehoe K, Wright JS, Mullen JB, Oetgen WJ. Improving cardio care in the outpatient setting: implementing the PINNACLE Registry in a single-specialty practice. Physician Exec. 2011;37:38-40, 2.
10. Romano MJ, Stafford RS. Electronic health records and clinical decision support systems: impact on national ambulatory care quality. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171:897-903.
11. Wright A, Henkin S, Feblowitz J, McCoy AB, Bates DW, Sittig DF. Early results of the meaningful use program for electronic health records. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:779-780.
12. Weiss JB, Grant A, Marelli A, etal. Assessment of electronic health information system use and need in US adult congenital heart disease centers. Congenit Heart Dis. 2011;6:134-138.
13. Linder JA, Ma J, Bates DW, Middleton B, Stafford RS. Electronic health record use and the quality of ambulatory care in the United States. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:1400-1405.