Heterosis for water status in maize seedlings

Agricultural Water Management

Volumn 164, Issue , 2016, Pages 100-109

  Chairi, Fadia ^a   Elazab, Abdelhalim ^a   Sanchez Bragado, Rut ^a   Araus, José Luis ^a   Serret, Maria Dolors ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Gas exchange; Heterosis; Maize; Root characteristics; Stable isotopes; Water use; Water use efficiency

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURE; CARBON; EFFICIENCY; IONIZATION OF GASES; ISOTOPES; NITROGEN; PHYSIOLOGY;

GAS EXCHANGE; HETEROSIS; MAIZE; ROOT CHARACTERISTICS; STABLE ISOTOPES; WATER USE; WATER USE EFFICIENCY;

PLANTS (BOTANY);

CROP IMPROVEMENT; GAS EXCHANGE; HETEROSIS; HYBRID; ISOTOPIC COMPOSITION; LIFE CYCLE; MAIZE; PHYSIOLOGY; ROOT ARCHITECTURE; SEEDLING; STABLE ISOTOPE; TRANSPIRATION; WATER USE; WATER USE EFFICIENCY;

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 84952863181     PISSN: 03783774     EISSN: 18732283     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2015.08.005     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Aggarwal P.K., Sinha S.K. Relationship between mother shoot and tillers as a criterion of selection for wide or specific adaptability to drought in maize. Zacker-Planzenb 1983, 152:310-320.
2. 2 exchange rate during the grin-filling period in maize. Crop Sci. 2004, 44:2095-2100.
3. Aliu S., Fetahu S.H., Salillari A. Estimation of heterosis and combining ability in maize (Zea mays L.) for ear weight (EW) using the diallel crossing method. Latv. J. Agron. 2008, 11:7-11.
4. Araus J.L., Sánchez C., Cabrera-Bosquet L. Is heterosis in maize mediated through better water use?. New Phytol. 2010, 187:392-406.
5. Arkin G.F., Monk R.L. Seedling photosynthetic efficiency of a grain sorghum hybrid and its parents. Crop Sci. 1979, 19:128-130.
6. Armengaud P., Zambaux K., Hills A., Sulpice R., Pattison R.J., Blatt M.R., Amtmann A. EZ-Rhizo: integrated software for the fast and accurate measurement of root system architecture. Plant J. 2009, 57:945-956.
7. Ashby E. Studies in the inheritance of physiological characters II. Further experiments upon the basis of hybrid vigour and upon the inheritance of efficiency index and respiration rate in maize. Ann. Bot. 1932, 46:1007-1032.
8. Ashby E. Hybrid vigor in maize. Am. Nat. 1936, 70:179-181.
9. Ashraf M., Mehmood S. Response of four Brassica species to drought stress. Environ. Exp. Bot. 1990, 30:93-110.
10. Aslam M., Zamir M.S.I., Afzar I., Yaseen M., Mubeen M. Drought stress, its effect on maize production and development of drought tolerance through potassium application. Cercet. Agron. în Moldova 2013, 154:99-114.
11. Barbour M.M. Stable oxygen isotope composition of plant tissue. Funct. Plant Biol. 2007, 34:83-94.
12. Benjamin J.G., Nielson D.C., Vigil M.C., Mikha M.M., Calderon F. Water deficit stress effects on corn (Zea mays, L.) root: shoot ratio. Open J. Soil Sci. 2014, 4:151-160.
13. Birchler J.A., Auger D.L., Riddle N.C. In search of the molecular basis of heterosis. Plant Cell 2003, 15:2236-2239.
14. Birchler J.A., Yao H., Chundalayandi S. Unraveling the genetic basis of hybrid vigor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2006, 103:12957-12958.
15. Blum A. Heterosis, stress, and the environment: a possible road map towards the general improvement of crop yield. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64:4829-4837.
16. 18O in maize grown under different water regimes. Ann. Bot. 2009, 104:1207-1216.
17. 18O) reflects yield potential and drought resistance in maize. Plant Cell. Environ. 2009, 32:1487-1499.
18. 18O response to water and nitrogen availability and its relationship with yield in field-grown durum wheat. Plant Cell. Environ. 2011, 34:418-433.
19. Cairns J.E., Sanchez C., Vargas M., Ordoñez R.A., Araus J.L. Dissecting maize productivity: ideotypes associated with grain yield under drought stress and well-watered conditions. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2012, 54:1007-1020.
20. Carvalho P.M. Optimising Root Growth to Improve Uptake and Utilization of Water and Nitrogen in Wheat and Barley. PhD Thesis 2009, University of Nottingham, UK.
21. Chun L., Mi J., Chen F., Zhang F. Genetic analysis of maize root characteristics in response to low nitrogen stress. Plant Soil 2005, 276:369-382.
22. Comas L.H., Bouma T.J., Eissenstat D.M. Linking root traits to potential growth rate in six temperate tree species. Oecologia 2002, 132:34-43.
23. Coplen, T.B., 2008. Explanatory glossary of terms used in expression of relative isotope ratios and gas ratios. UPAC Recommendations 2008. (International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry Inorganic Chemistry Division, Commission on Isotopic Abundances and Atomic Weights: Research Triangle Park, NC, USA).
24. Eissenstat D.M. On the relationship between specific root length and the rate of root proliferation: afield study using citrus rootstocks. New Phytol. 1991, 118:63-68.
25. 18O of durum wheat under different water regimes. Funct. Plant Biol. 2012, 39:379-393.
26. Farquhar G.D., Cernusak L.A., Barnes B. Heavy water fractionation during transpiration. Plant Physiol. 2007, 143:11-18.
27. Farquhar G.D., Hunick K.T., Condon A.G., Richards R.A. Carbon isotope fractionation and plant water use efficiency. Stable Isotopes in Ecological Research 1989, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 22-40. P.W. Rundel, J.R. Ehleringer, K.A. Nagy (Eds.).
28. 18O with wheat phenology and yield under water-limited conditions. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2007, 150:207-215.
29. Glab T. Effect of soil compaction on root system development and yields of tall fescue. Int. Agrophys. 2007, 21:233-239.
30. Golbashy M., Ebrahimi M., Khorasani S.K., Choukan R. Evaluation of drought tolerance of some corn (Zea mays L.) hybrids in Iran. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2010, 5:2714-2719.
31. Gregory P.J., Tennant D., Belford R.K. Root and shoot growth and water and light-use efficiency of barley and wheat crops grown on a shallow duplex soil in a Mediterranean-type environment. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1992, 43:555-573.
32. Hasegawa H., Kont T., Kono Y. Heterosis for root system development in Japonica Indica F1 Rice hybrid. Nippon Sakumotsu Gakkai Kiji 1993, 62:261-266.
33. Hochholdinger F., Hoecker N. Towards the molecular basis of heterosis. Trends Plant Sci. 2007, 12:427-432.
34. Hoecker N., Keller B., Piepho H.P., Hochholdinger F. Manifestation of heterosis during early maize (Zea mays L.) root development. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2006, 112:421-429.
35. Jiang Q., Roche D., Monaco T.A., Hole D. Stomatal conductance is a key parameter to assess limitations to photosynthesis and growth potential in barely genotypes. Plant Biol. 2006, 8:515-521.
36. Kondo M., Murty M.V.R., Aragones D.V. Characteristics of root growth and water uptake from soil in upland rice and maize under water stress. Soil. Sci. Plant Nutr. 2000, 46:721-732.
37. Li B., Tian X.L., Wang G.W., Pan F., Li Z.H. Heterosis of root growth in maize (Zea mays L.) seedlings under water stress. Acta. Agron. Sin. 2008, 34:662-668.
38. Ma Z., Wood C.W., Branshby D. Impacts of soil on root characteristics of switchgrass. Biomass Bioenergy 2000, 18:105-112.
39. Marcon C., Schützenmeister A., Schütz W., Madlung J., Piepho H.P., Hochholdinger F. Nonadditive protein accumulation patterns in maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids during embryo development. J. Proteome Res. 2010, 9:6511-6522.
40. 3 plants in response to progressive drought: stomatal conductance as a reference parameter. Ann. Bot. 2002, 89:895-905.
41. Meyer S., Pospisil H., Scholten S. Heterosis associated gene expression in maize embryos 6 days after fertilization exhibits additive, dominant and overdominant pattern. Plant Mol. Biol. 2007, 63:381-391.
42. 12C isotope labelling. Plant Physiol. 2004, 137:1-10.
43. Passioura J.B. Root and drought resistance. Agric. Water Manag. 1983, 7:265-280.
44. 2 enrichment on four poplar clones. I. Growth and leaf anatomy. Ann. Bot. 1990, 65:617-626.
45. Reich P.B., Walters M.B., Tjoelker M.G., Vanderklein D., Buschena C. Photosynthesis and respiration rates depend on leaf and root morphology and nitrogen concentration in nine boreal tree species differing in relative growth rate. Ecology 1998, 12:395-405.
46. Rood S.B., Buzzell R.I., Mander L.N., Pearce D., Pharis R.P. Gibberellins: a phytohormonal basis for heterosis in maize. Science 1988, 241:1216-1218.
47. Sinha S.K., Khanna R. Physiological, biochemical and genetic basis of heterosis. Adv. Agron. 1975, 27:123-170.
48. Smith S.N. Response of inbred lines and crosses in maize to variations of nitrogen and phosphorus supplied as nutrients. Am. Soc. Agron. 1934, 26:785-804.
49. Tollenaar M., Ahmadzadeh A., Lee E.A. Physiological basis of heterosis for grain yield in maize. Crop Sci. 2004, 44:2086-2094.
50. Tollenaar M., Lee E.A. Dissection of physiological processes underlying grain yield in maize by examining genetic improvement and heterosis. Maydica 2006, 51:399-408.
51. Wei G., Tao Y., Liu G., Chen C., Luo R., Xiao H., Gran Q., Zeng H., Lu Z., Han Y., Li X., Song G., Zhai H., Peng Y., Li D., Xu H., Wei X., Cao M., Deng H., Xin Y., Fu X., Yuan L., Yu J., Zhu Z., Zhu L. A transcriptomic analysis of super hybrid rice LYP9 and its parents. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009, 106:7695-7701.
52. 15N tracks nitrogen metabolism and genotypic adaptation of durum wheat to salinity and water deficit. New Phytol. 2012, 194:230-244.
53. 15N in durum wheat exposed to salinity at the vegetative and reproductive stages. Plant Cell. Environ. 2013, 36:1214-1227.