Spatial memory in foraging games

Cognition

Volumn 148, Issue , 2016, Pages 85-96

  Kerster, Bryan E ^a   Rhodes, Theo ^b   Kello, Christopher T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT OSWEGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Area restricted search; Foraging; Search model; Spatial memory

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; FEMALE; FORAGING; HUMAN; MALE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGY; SPATIAL MEMORY; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; VIDEO GAME; VISUAL MEMORY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SPATIAL BEHAVIOR;

COGNITION; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; SPATIAL BEHAVIOR; SPATIAL MEMORY; SPATIAL NAVIGATION; VIDEO GAMES;

EID: 84952700814     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: 18737838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.12.015     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 1974, 19:716-723.
2. Allan D.W. Statistics of atomic frequency standards. Proceedings of the IEEE 1966, 54(2):221-230.
3. Bartumeus F., da Luz M.G.E., Viswanathan G.M., Catalan J. Animal search strategies: A quantitative random-walk analysis. Ecology 2005, 86(11):3078-3087.
4. Boyer D., Crofoot M.C., Walsh P.D. Non-random walks in monkeys and humans. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 2011.
5. Boyer D., Walsh P.D. Modelling the mobility of living organisms in heterogeneous landscapes: Does memory improve foraging success?. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 2010, 368(1933):5645-5659.
6. Breed G.A., Severns P.M., Edwards A.M. Apparent power-law distributions in animal movements can arise from intraspecific interactions. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 2015, 12(103).
7. Cain M.S., Vul E., Clark K., Mitroff S.R. A Bayesian optimal foraging model of human visual search. Psychological Science 2012.
8. Charnov E.L. Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. Theoretical Population Biology 1976, 9(2):129-136.
9. Clauset A., Shalizi C.R., Newman M.E.J. Power-law distributions in empirical data. SIAM Review 2009, 51:661-703.
10. Edwards A.M., Freeman M.P., Breed G.A., Jonsen I.D. Incorrect likelihood methods were used to infer scaling laws of marine predator search behaviour. PLoS ONE 2012, 7(10):e45174.
11. Elazary L., Itti L. A Bayesian model for efficient visual search and recognition. Vision Research 2010, 50(14):1338-1352.
12. Fagan W.F., Lewis M.A., Auger-Méthé M., Avgar T., Benhamou S., Breed G., Mueller T. Spatial memory and animal movement. Ecology Letters 2013, 16(10):1316-1329.
13. Fauchald P., Tveraa T. Using first-passage time in the analysis of area-restricted search and habitat selection. Ecology 2003, 84(2):282-288.
14. Ferreira A.S., Raposo E.P., Viswanathan G.M., da Luz M.G.E. The influence of the environment on Lévy random search efficiency: Fractality and memory effects. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 2012, 391(11):3234-3246.
15. Folse L.J., Packard J.M., Grant W.E. AI modelling of animal movements in a heterogeneous habitat. Ecological Modelling 1989, 46(1-2):57-72.
16. Fronhofer E.A., Hovestadt T., Poethke H.-J. From random walks to informed movement. Oikos 2013, 122(6):857-866.
17. Gautestad A.O., Mysterud I. The home range fractal: From random walk to memory-dependent space use. Ecological Complexity 2010, 7(4):458-470.
18. Gureckis, T. M., & Markant, D. (2009). Active learning strategies in a spatial concept learning game. In Proceedings of the 31st annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 3145-3150).
19. Hills T.T. Animal foraging and the evolution of goal-directed cognition. Cognitive Science 2006, 30(1):3-41.
20. Hills, T. T., & Dukas, R. (2012). The evolution of cognitive search. Paper presented at the cognitive search: Evolution, algorithms, and the brain, Strüngmann forum report.
21. Hills T.T., Jones M.N., Todd P.M. Optimal foraging in semantic memory. Psychological Review 2012, 119(2):431-440.
22. Hills T.T., Kalff C., Wiener J.M. Adaptive Lévy processes and area-restricted search in human foraging. PLoS ONE 2013, 8(4):e60488.
23. Hills T.T., Todd P.M., Lazer D., Redish A.D., Couzin I.D. Exploration versus exploitation in space, mind, and society. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2015, 19(1):46-54.
24. Horowitz T.S., Wolfe J.M. Visual search has no memory. Nature 1998, 394(6693):575-577.
25. Humphries N.E., Queiroz N., Dyer J.R.M., Pade N.G., Musyl M.K., Schaefer K.M., Sims D.W. Environmental context explains Lévy and Brownian movement patterns of marine predators. Nature 2010, 465(7301):1066-1069.
26. Humphries N.E., Weimerskirch H., Queiroz N., Southall E.J., Sims D.W. Foraging success of biological Lévy flights recorded in situ. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2012, 109(19):7169-7174.
27. Janson C.H. Experimental evidence for spatial memory in foraging wild capuchin monkeys, Cebus apella. Animal Behaviour 1998, 55(5):1229-1243.
28. Janson C., Byrne R. What wild primates know about resources: Opening up the black box. Animal Cognition 2007, 10(3):357-367.
29. Kamil A.C., Roitblat H.L. The ecology of foraging behavior: Implications for animal learning and memory. Annual Review of Psychology 1985, 36(1):141-169.
30. Kareiva P., Odell G. Swarms of predators exhibit" preytaxis" if individual predators use area-restricted search. American Naturalist 1987, 130(2):233-270.
31. Klein R.M., MacInnes W.J. Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search. Psychological Science 1999, 10(4):346-352.
32. Montez P., Thompson G., Kello C.T. The role of semantic clustering in optimal memory foraging. Cognitive Science 2015.
33. Nabe-Nielsen J., Tougaard J., Teilmann J., Lucke K., Forchhammer M.C. How a simple adaptive foraging strategy can lead to emergent home ranges and increased food intake. Oikos 2013, 122(9):1307-1316.
34. Najemnik J., Geisler W.S. Optimal eye movement strategies in visual search. Nature 2005, 434(7031):387-391.
35. Nathan R., Getz W.M., Revilla E., Holyoak M., Kadmon R., Saltz D., Smouse P.E. A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2008, 105(49):19052-19059.
36. Nonacs P. State dependent behavior and the marginal value theorem. Behavioral Ecology 2001, 12(1):71-83.
37. Peterson M.S., Kramer A.F., Wang R.F., Irwin D.E., McCarley J.S. Visual search has memory. Psychological Science 2001, 12(4):287-292.
38. Pirolli P., Card S. Information foraging. Psychological Review 1999, 106(4):643-675.
39. Pyke G.H. Optimal foraging theory: A critical review. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1984, 15:523-575.
40. Pyke G.H. Understanding movements of organisms: It's time to abandon the Lévy foraging hypothesis. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 2015, 6(1):1-16.
41. Rhee I., Shin M., Hong S., Lee K., Kim S.J., Chong S. On the levy-walk nature of human mobility. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON) 2011, 19:630-643.
42. Rhodes T., Kello C.T., Kerster B. Intrinsic and extrinsic contributions to heavy tails in visual foraging. Visual Cognition 2014, 22(6):809-842.
43. Rhodes T., Turvey M.T. Human memory retrieval as Lévy foraging. Physica A 2007, 385:255-260.
44. Ross, J., Irani, L., Silberman, M. S., Zaldivar, A., & Tomlinson, B. (2010). Who are the crowdworkers?: Shifting demographics in mechanical turk. Paper presented at the CHI '10 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
45. Saarenmaa H., Stone N.D., Folse L.J., Packard J.M., Grant W.E., Makela M.E., Coulson R.N. An artificial intelligence modelling approach to simulating animal/habitat interactions. Ecological Modelling 1988, 44(1-2):125-141.
46. Scheibehenne B., Wilke A., Todd P.M. Expectations of clumpy resources influence predictions of sequential events. Evolution and Human Behavior 2011, 32(5):326-333.
47. Suzuki W.A., Clayton N.S. The hippocampus and memory: A comparative and ethological perspective. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2000, 10(6):768-773.
48. Tatler B.W., Hayhoe M.M., Land M.F., Ballard D.H. Eye guidance in natural vision: Reinterpreting salience. Journal of Vision 2011, 11(5).
49. Viswanathan G.M., Afanasyev V., Buldyrev S.V., Murphy E.J., Prince P.A., Stanley H.E. Levy flight search patterns of wandering albatrosses. Nature 1996, 381(6581):413-415.
50. Viswanathan G.M., Buldyrev S.V., Havlin S., da Luz M.G.E., Raposo E.P., Stanley H.E. Optimizing the success of random searches. Nature 1999, 401(6756):911-914.
51. Viswanathan G.M., da Luz M.G.E., Raposo E.P., Stanley H.E. The physics of foraging: An introduction to random searches and biological encounters 2011, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
52. Wang R.F., Spelke E.S. Human spatial representation: Insights from animals. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2002, 6(9):376-382.
53. Wilke A., Barrett H.C. The hot hand phenomenon as a cognitive adaptation to clumped resources. Evolution and Human Behavior 2009, 30(3):161-169.
54. Wolbers T., Wiener J.M. Challenges for identifying the neural mechanisms that support spatial navigation: The impact of spatial scale. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2014, 8:571.
55. Wolfe J.M. Moving towards solutions to some enduring controversies in visual search. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2003, 7(2):70-76.
56. Wolfe J., Pokorny C. Inhibitory tagging in visual search: A failure to replicate. Perception & Psychophysics 1990, 48(4):357-362.