Parenchymal FLAIR hyperintensity before thrombolysis is a prognostic factor of ischemic stroke outcome at 3 Tesla

Journal of Neuroradiology

Volumn 42, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 269-277

  Emeriau, Samuel ^a   Soize, Sébastien ^a   Riffaud, Laurence ^a   Toubas, Olivier ^a   Pombourcq, Francis ^a   Pierot, Laurent ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE REIMS CHAMPAGNE ARDENNE   (France)

Author keywords

Acute stroke; Assessments; Magnetic resonance imaging; Patient outcomes; Prognosis; Therapeutic thrombolysis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD CLOT LYSIS; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH STROKE SCALE; NERVOUS SYSTEM PARAMETERS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARENCHYMA; PARENCHYMAL FLUID ATTENUATED INVERSION RECOVERY HYPERINTENSITY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROGNOSIS; RANKIN SCALE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; BRAIN; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FIBRINOLYTIC THERAPY; FRANCE; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PREVALENCE; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; STROKE; SURVIVAL RATE;

AGED; BRAIN; FEMALE; FRANCE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PREVALENCE; PROGNOSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STROKE; SURVIVAL RATE; THROMBOLYTIC THERAPY;

EID: 84952660585     PISSN: 01509861     EISSN: 17730406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurad.2015.04.008     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Emeriau S., Serre I., Toubas O., et al. Can diffusion-weighted imaging-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery mismatch (positive diffusion-weighted imaging/negative fluid-attenuated inversion recovery) at 3 tesla identify patients with stroke at <4.5hours?. Stroke 2013, 44:1647-1651.
2. Petkova M., Rodrigo S., Lamy C., et al. MR imaging helps predict time from symptom onset in patients with acute stroke: implications for patients with unknown onset time. Radiology 2010, 257:782-792.
3. Thomalla G., Cheng B., Ebinger M., et al. DWI-FLAIR mismatch for the identification of patients with acute ischaemic stroke within 4-5h of symptom onset (PRE-FLAIR): a multicentre observational study. Lancet Neurol 2011, 10:978-986.
4. Guidelines for management of ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack 2008. Cerebrovasc Dis 2008, 25:457-507. The European Stroke Organisation (ESO) Executive Committee and the ESO Writing Committee.
5. Hacke W., Kaste M., Bluhmki E., et al. Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5hours after acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2008, 359:1317-1329.
6. Lövblad K.O., Pierot L. Neuroradiology of acute stroke, where are we today?. J Neuroradiol 2015, 42:1-2.
7. Shuaib A., Butcher K., Mohammad A.A., et al. Collateral blood vessels in acute ischaemic stroke: a potential therapeutic target. Lancet Neurol 2011, 10:909-921.
8. Ebinger M., Kufner A., Galinovic I., et al. Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images and stroke outcome after thrombolysis. Stroke 2012, 43:539-542.
9. Ebinger M., Ostwaldt A.C., Galinovic I., et al. Clinical and radiological courses do not differ between fluid-attenuated inversion recovery-positive and negative patients with stroke after thrombolysis. Stroke 2010, 41:1823-1825.
10. Pierot L., Soize S., Benaissa A., Wakhloo A.K. Techniques for endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke: from intra-arterial fibrinolytics to stent-retrievers. Stroke 2015, 46:909-914.
11. Soize S., Naggara O., Desal H., Costalat V., Ricolfi F., Pierot L. Endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke in France: a nationwide survey. J Neuroradiol 2014, 41:71-79.
12. Soize S., Kadziolka K., Estrade L., Serre I., Bakchine S., Pierot L. Mechanical thrombectomy in acute stroke: prospective pilot trial of the solitaire FR device while under conscious sedation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013, 34:360-365.
13. Kanekar S.G., Zacharia T., Roller R. Imaging of stroke: part 2, pathophysiology at the molecular and cellular levels and corresponding imaging changes. Am J Roentgenol 2012, 198:63-74.
14. Toyoda K., Ida M., Fukuda K. Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery intraarterial signal: an early sign of hyperacute cerebral ischemia. Am J Neuroradiol 2011, 22:1021-1029.
15. Adams H.P., Bendixen B.H., Kappelle L.J., et al. Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. Toast. Trial of org 10,172 in acute stroke treatment. Stroke 1993, 24:35-41.
16. Young F., Weir C., Lees K. Comparison of the national institutes of Health Stroke Scale with disability outcome measures in acute stroke trials. Stroke 2005, 36:2187-2192.
17. Ziegler A., Ebinger M., Fiebach J.B., et al. Judgment of FLAIR signal change in DWI-FLAIR mismatch determination is a challenge to clinicians. J Neurol 2012, 259:971-973.
18. Fazekas F., Chawluk J.B., Alavi A., et al. MR signal abnormalities at 1.5 t in Alzheimer's dementia and normal aging. Am J Roentgenol 1987, 149:351-356.
19. Barber P.A., Demchuk A.M., Zhang J., et al. Validity and reliability of a quantitative computed tomography score in predicting outcome of hyperacute stroke before thrombolytic therapy. Alberta stroke program early CT score. Lancet 2000, 355:1670-1674.
20. Barber P.A., Hill M.D., Eliasziw M., et al. Imaging of the brain in acute ischaemic stroke: comparison of computed tomography and magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005, 76:1528-1533.
21. Hosmer D.W., Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression 2000, Editions Wiley, New York. 2nd ed.
22. Costalat V., Lobotesis K., Machi P., et al. Prognostic factors related to clinical outcome following thrombectomy in ischemic stroke (recost study). Fifty patients prospective study. Eur J Radiol 2012, 81:4075-4082.
23. von Kummer R., Dzialowski I., Gerber J. Therapeutic efficacy of brain imaging in acute ischemic stroke patients. J Neuroradiol 2015, 42:47-54.