Similarity in computational music: A musicologist's approach

Proceedings - 1st International Conference on WEB Delivering of Music, WEDELMUSIC 2001

Volumn , Issue , 2001, Pages 107-113

  Barthelemy, J ^a   Bonardi, A ^a  

^a IRCAM   (France)

Author keywords

approximate string matching; data mining; Music analysis; music encoding; music information retrieval; string algorithms

Indexed keywords

BIOINFORMATICS; DATA MINING; ENCODING (SYMBOLS); TEXT PROCESSING;

APPLICATION OF ALGORITHMS; APPROXIMATE STRING MATCHING; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; MUSIC ANALYSIS; MUSIC INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; MUSICAL ANALYSIS; NUMBER OF METHODS; STRING ALGORITHMS;

PATTERN MATCHING;

EID: 84952656826     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/WDM.2001.990165     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. BONARDI, A., Music IR for Contemporary Music : What the Musicologist Needs, Proceedings of the first International Symposium on Music Information Retrieval, Plymouth (USA), october 2000.
2. BOULEZ, P., Jalons (pour une décennie) - Dix ans d'enseignement au Collège de France, Paris, Christian Bourgois Editeur, 1989, 451 p.
3. CAMBOUROPOULOS, E., CROCHEMORE, M., ILIOPOULOS, C.S., MOUCHARD, L. and PINZON, Y.J. (1999), Algorithms for Computing Approximate Repetitions in Musical Sequences, In (Proceedings of the AWOCA'99 Workshop Australasian Workshop on Combinatorial Algorithm 25-27 July 1999, Perth, Western Australia.
4. CAMBOUROPOULOS, E., Melodic Cue Abstraction, Similarity and Category Formation: A Computational Approach, In Proceedings of ICMPC 2000 (International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition), 5-10 Aug. 2000, Keele, U.K., Revised version to appear in Music Perception 18(3), Spring 2001.
5. CHOUVEL, J.-M., Polyphonie/polysémie, comment aborder la multidimensionalité du temps musical, in (Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Musical Epistemology, to be published).
6. CRAWFORD, T., ILIOPOULOS, C. S., RAMAN, R., String Matching Techniques for Musical Similarity and Melodic Recognition, in (Computing in Musicology 11, Walter B. Hewlett and Eleanor Selfridge-Field, ed., CCARH, the MIT press, Stanford Univeristy, Stanford, CA) 73-100.
7. CROCHEMORE, M., ILIOPOULOS, C. S., YU, H., Algorithms for Computing Evolutionary Chains in Molecular and Musical Sequence in (Proceedings of the ninth Australian Workshop on Combinatorial Algorithms AWOCA'98, C.S. Iliopoulos, ed., School of Computing, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Western Australia, 1998, p 172-184).
8. DELEUZE, G., Différence et répétition, Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 1968, 409 p.
9. GUSFIELD, D., Algorithms on strings, trees, and sequences, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1997, 534 p.
10. LEPPIG, M., Musikuntersuchungen im Rechenautomaten, Musica 41/2, 1987, p. 140-150.
11. ROLLAND, P.-Y., Automated Discovery of Regularities in Sequences and its Application to Music Analysis, PhD thesis, UNIVERSITÉ PARIS 6, July 1998, 335 p.
12. ROSEN, C., The classical style, London, Faber and Faber, 1984, 467 p.
13. RUWET, N., Méthodes d'analyse en musicologie, in Revue belge de Musicologie, 20 (1966), p 65-90.
14. RUWET, N., La répétition dans la syntaxe musicale, in To Honor Roman Jakobson, Mouton, La Haye, (1967)
15. SCHOENBERG, A., Bach, in Style and Idea, Faber and Faber, 1975, p. 393-397.
16. SCHOENBERG, A., Brahms the progressive, in Style and Idea, Faber and Faber, 1975, p. 398-441.
17. SELFRIDGE-FIELD, E., Conceptual and Representational Issues in Melodic Comparison, in (Computing in Musicology 11, Walter B. Hewlett and Eleanor Selfridge-Field, ed., CCARH, the MIT press, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, p. 4-64).