A clinical comparison of intravenous and epidural local anesthetic for major abdominal surgery

Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 28-36

  Terkawi, Abdullah S ^a   Tsang, Siny ^b   Kazemi, Ali ^a   Morton, Steve ^a   Luo, Roy ^a   Sanders, Daniel T ^a   Regali, Lindsay A ^a   Columbano, Heather ^a   Kurtzeborn, Nicole Y ^a   Durieux, Marcel E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^b Columbia University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LIDOCAINE; LOCAL ANESTHETIC AGENT; NARCOTIC ANALGESIC AGENT;

ABDOMINAL SURGERY; ADULT; ANALGESIA; CATHETER REMOVAL; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONFUSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIPLOPIA; DIZZINESS; EAR DISEASE; EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA; FEMALE; HEART ARRHYTHMIA; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; HYPOTENSION; INTRAVENOUS ANESTHESIA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCLE DISEASE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARESTHESIA; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRURITUS; RECOVERY ROOM; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEIZURE; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; URINE RETENTION; ABDOMEN; AGED; EPIDURAL ANALGESIA; INTRAVENOUS DRUG ADMINISTRATION; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PROCEDURES; SURGERY;

ABDOMEN; ADULT; AGED; ANALGESIA, EPIDURAL; ANALGESICS, OPIOID; ANESTHETICS, LOCAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFUSIONS, INTRAVENOUS; LIDOCAINE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84952362104     PISSN: 10987339     EISSN: 15328651     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000332     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Hughes MJ, Ventham NT, McNally S, Harrison E, Wigmore S. Analgesia after open abdominal surgery in the setting of enhanced recovery surgery: a systematic review and meta-Analysis. JAMA Surg. 2014;149: 1224-1230.
2. Werawatganon T, Charuluxananan S. WITHDRAWN: patient controlled intravenous opioid analgesia versus continuous epidural analgesia for pain after int ra-Abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013:CD004088.
3. Low J, Johnston N, Morris C. Epidural analgesia: first do no harm. Anaesthesia. 2008;63:1-3.
4. Moen V, Dahlgren N, Irestedt L. Severe neurological complications after central neuraxial blockades in Sweden 1990-1999. Anesthesiology. 2004;101:950-959.
5. Hermanides J, Hollmann MW, Stevens MF, Lirk P. Failed epidural: causes and management. Br J Anaesth. 2012;109:144-154.
6. Marret E, Rolin M, Beaussier M, Bonnet F. Meta-Analysis of intravenous lidocaine and postoperative recovery after abdominal surgery. Br J Surg. 2008;95:1331-1338.
7. Sun Y, Li T, Wang N, Yun Y, Gan TJ. Perioperative systemic lidocaine for postoperative analgesia and recovery after abdominal surgery: a meta-Analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55:1183-1194.
8. Swenson BR, Gottschalk A, Wells LT, et al. Intravenous lidocaine is as effective as epidural bupivacaine in reducing ileus duration, hospital stay, and pain after open colon resection: a randomized clinical trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010;35:370-376.
9. Mascha EJ, Turan A. Joint hypothesis testing and gatekeeping procedures for studies with multiple endpoints. Anesth Analg. 2012;114:1304-1317.
10. Head SJ, Kaul S, Bogers AJ, Kappetein AP. Non-inferiority study design: lessons to be learned from cardiovascular trials. Eur Heart J. 2012;33: 1318-1324.
11. Equivalent Opioid Calculator (EOC). Available at http://clincalc.com/Opioids/. Accessed March 19, 2015.
12. Ma Y,MazumdarM,Memtsoudis SG. Beyond repeated-measures analysis of variance: advanced statistical methods for the analysis of longitudinal data in anesthesia research. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012;37:99-105.
13. Thiele RH, Rea KM, Turrentine FE, et al. Standardization of care: impact of an enhanced recovery protocol on length of stay, complications, and direct costs after colorectal surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;2 20: 430-443.
14. Kuo CP, Jao SW, Chen KM, et al. Comparison of the effects of thoracic epidural analgesia and i.v. infusion with lidocaine on cytokine response, postoperative pain and bowel function in patient s undergoing colonic surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2006;97:640-646.
15. Hollmann MW, Durieux ME. Local anesthetics and the inflammatory response: a new therapeutic indication? Anesthesiology. 2000;93: 858-875.
16. Kooij FO, Schlack WS, Preckel B, HollmannMW. Does regional analgesia for major surgery improve outcome? Focus on epidural analgesia. Anesth Analg. 2014;119:740-744.
17. Owen RM, Perez SD, Bornstein WA, Sweeney JF. Impact of surgical care improvement project inf-9 on postoperative urinary tract infections: do exemptions interfere with quality patient care? Arch Surg. 2012;147:946-9 53.
18. Møiniche S, Kehlet H, Dahl JB. A qualitative and quantitative systematic review of preemptive analgesia for postoperative pain relief: the role of timing of analgesia. Anesthesiology. 2002;96: 725-741.
19. Groudine SB, Fisher HA, Kaufman RP Jr., et al. Intravenous lidocaine speeds the return of bowel function, decreases postoperative pain, and shortens hospital stay in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Anesth Analg. 1998;86:235-239.
20. Herroeder S, Pecher S, Schönherr ME, et al. Systemic lidocaine shortens length of hospital stay after colorectal surgery: a double-blinded, r andomized, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2007;246:192-200.
21. Kim DH, Lin Y, Goytizolo EA, et al. Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block for total knee arthroplasty: a prospective , randomized, controlled trial. Anesthesiology. 2014;120:540-550.
22. Ilfeld BM, Mariano ER, Madison SJ, et al. Continuous femoral versus posterior lumbar plexus nerve blocks for analgesia after hip arthroplasty: a randomized, controlled study. Anesth Analg. 2011;113:897-903.
23. AllenHW, Liu SS,Ware PD, Nairn CS, Owens BD. Peripheral nerve blocks improve analgesia after total knee replacement surgery. Anesth Analg. 1998;87:93-97.
24. Rigg JR, Jamrozik K, Myles PS, et al.; MASTER Anaethesia Trial Study Group. Epidural anaesthesia and analgesia and outcome of major surgery: a random ised trial. Lancet. 2002;359:1276-1282.