A brave new world: User studies in the humanities enter the electronic age

Reference Librarian

Volumn 23, Issue 49-50, 1995, Pages 61-81

  Reynolds, Judy ^a  

^a SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84952240988     PISSN: 02763877     EISSN: 15411117     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/J120v23n49_05     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Swank, Raynard, “The Organization of Library Materials for Research in English Literature,” Library Quarterly 15 (1945):49-74.
2. Immroth, J. “Information Need for the Humanities,” in Debons, A, Information Science: Search for Identity. Proceedings of the 1972 Nato Advanced Study Institute of Information Science, New York, 1974, pp. 249-62
3. Bebout, Donald Davis and Oehlerts, “User Studies in the Humanities: A Survey and a Proposal,” RQ 15 (Fall 1975):40-44
4. Soper, M.E., “Characteristics and Use of Personal Collections,” Library Quarterly 46, no.4 (Oct. 1976):397-415
5. Heinzkill, Richard, “Characteristics of Reference in Selected Scholarly English Literary Journals,” Library Quarterly 50 (July 1980):352-365
6. Steig, Margaret E, “Information Needs of Historians,” College and Research Libraries 42, no.6 (Nov. 1981):549-560
7. Stone, Sue, “Progress in Documentation, Humanities Scholars,” Journal of Documentation 38 (Dec. 1982):292-313
8. Smalley, Topsey N. and Stephen H. Plum, “Teaching Library Researching in the Humanities and the Sciences: a Contextual Approach,” pp.135-170
9. Oberman, Cerise and Ratina Straudi, eds., Theories of Bibliographic Education; Designs for Teaching. R.R. Bowker, New York, 1982.
10. Stamm, Deirdre C, “How Art Historians Look for Information,” Art Documentation 3 (Winter 1984):117-119.
11. Stern, Madeline, “Characteristics of the Literature of Literary Scholars,” College and Research Libraries 44, no.4 (July 1983):203
12. Stoan, Stephen K., “Research and Library Skills: and Analysis and Interpretation,” College and Research Libraries 45 (March 1984):102-103.
13. Guest, Susan S., “The Use of Bibliographic Tools by Humanities Faculty at State University of New York Albany,” The Reference Librarian 18 (Summer 1987):167.
14. Gould, Constance, Information Needs in the Humanities. RLG, Stanford, CA, 1988, pp.51-2.
15. Mooer, Calvin N., “Mooer’s Law, or Why Some Retrieval Systems are Used and Others are Not,” American Documentation 11, no.3 (July 1960): p.2.
16. Crawford, David, “Meeting Scholarly Information Needs in an Automated Environment,” College and Research Libraries 47 (Nov. 1986):570.
17. Weinberg, Bella H., “Why Indexing Fails the Researcher,” Indexer 16 (April 1988):6.
18. McCarthy, Constance, “The Faculty Problem,” Journal of Academic Librarianship 11 (July 1985): 143.
19. Wiberley, Stephen E. and William G. Jones, “Patterns of Information Seeking in the Humanities,” College and Research Libraries 50, no.6 (Nov. 1989):638-645.
20. Guest, Susan S., (1987).
21. Markey, Karen. Subject Searching in Library Catalogs. OCLC, Dublin, 1984.
22. Frost, Carolyn O., “Faculty Use of Subject Searching in Card and Online Catalogs.” Journal of Academic Librarianship 13, no.2 (May 1987):86-92.
23. Broadbent, Elaine, “A Study of Humanities Faculty Library Seeking Behavior,” Catalog and Classification Quarterly 6 (Spring 1986):23-37.
24. Wilson, Patrick and Mona Farid, “On the Use of the Records of Research,” Library Quarterly 49, no.2 (April 1979): 143.
25. Stone, Sue, (1982):299.
26. Stem, Peter, “Online in the Humanities,” Journal of Academic Librarian-ship 14 (July 1988):161-164.
27. Gould, Constance, (1988):51.
28. Walker, Geraldine, “Searching the Humanities: Subject Overlap and Searching Vocabulary,” Database 13 (Oct. 1990):41.
29. Gould, Constance, (1988):52-3.
30. Bates, Marcia J., Deborah N. Wilde and Susan Siegfried, “An Analysis of Search Terminology Used by Humanities Scholars: the Getty Online Searching Project Report Number 1,” Library Quarterly 63, no.1 (Jan. 1993):36.
31. Mandel, Carol A. and Judith Herschman, “Online Subject Access-Enhancing the Library Catalog,” Journal of Academic Librarianship 9 (July 1983): 149.
32. Hurych, Jitka, “After Bath: Scientist, Social Scientists, and Humanists in the Context of Online Searching,” Journal of Academic Librarianship 12, no.3 (July 1986):158-65.
33. McCarthy, Constance, “The Reliability Factor in Subject Access-Enhancing the Library Catalog,” Journal of Academic Librarianship 9 (Jan. 1986):54.
34. Wiberley, Stephen E. Jr., “Names in Space and Time,” Library Quarterly 58 (Jan. 1988):25.
35. Wiberley, Stephen E., “Subject Access in the Humanities,” Library Quarterly 53, no.4 (Oct. 1983):420-433.
36. Stone, Sue, (1982):306.
37. Wiberley, Stephen, (1988).
38. Falk, Joyce Duncan, “Searching by Historical Period in the History Databases,” in Natianal Online Meeting: Proceedings, 1981, Williams, Martha E. and Thomas H. Hogan, comps. Learned Information, Medford, NJ, 1981:200.
39. Walker, Geraldine, “Searching the Humanities: Subject Overlap and Searching Vocabulary,” Database 13, no.5 (Oct. 1990):41.
40. Ward, Sandra and Laura M. Osegueda, “Teaching University Student End-users About Online Searching,” Science and Technology Libraries 5, no. 1 (Fall 1984): 17-31.
41. Walker, Geraldine, (1990):45.
42. Bates, Wilde and Siegfried, (1993):36-7.
43. Reynolds, Judy (1983), unpublished paper.
44. Pankake, Marcia, “Humanities Research in the 90s; What Scholars Need; What Librarians Can Do,” Library Hi Tech 9, no. 1 (1991):14.
45. Frost, Carolyn, (1987).
46. Ross, James E., “Artists and Poets Online,” Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 7 (Spring 1987):97.
47. Bates, Wilde and Siegfried, (1993):35.
48. Hoogcarspel, Annelies, “The Rutgers Inventory of Machine Readable Text in the Humanities: Cataloging and Access,” Information Technology and Libraries 13, no. 1 (March l994):27-34.
49. Stebelman, Scott, “Vocabulary Control and the Humanities: A Case Study of the MLA International Bibliography,” The Reference Librarian 47 (Summer 1994).
50. Bates, Wilde & Siegfried, (1993):34.
51. Wiberley, Stephen, (1988):26.
52. Walker, G., “Online Searching in the Humanities: Implications for End-users and Intermediaries,” in Online Information 88; Proceedings of the 12th International Online Information Meeting, London, Dec. 6-8, 1988. Learned Information, Oxford 1988:401-412.
53. Garfield, Eugene, “Is Information Retrieval in the Arts and Humanities Inherently Different from that in Science? The Effect that ISI’s Citation Index for the Arts and Humanities is Expected to have on Future Scholarship,” Library Quarterly 50, no. 1 (l980):40-57
54. Heinzkill, Richard, (1980) “Is Information Retrieval in the Arts and Humanities Inherently Different from that in Science? The Effect that ISI’s Citation Index for the Arts and Humanities is Expected to have on Future Scholarship,” Library Quarterly 50, no. 1 (l980):40-57.
55. Kochen, Manfred, “How Well do We Acknowledge Intellectual Debts?” Journal of Documentation 43, no. 1 (March 1987):54-64.
56. Bates, Wilde and Siegfried, (1993): 11-2.
57. Steig, Margaret, (1981).
58. Stem, Madeline, (1983):204.
59. Stem, Madeline, (1983):208.
60. Stem, Madeline, (1983):207.
61. Guest, Susan, (1987):166.
62. Wiberley, Stephen, “Sources for the Humanities: Measuring Use and Meeting Needs,” in Stueart, Robert D. and Richard D. Johnson, eds., New Horizons for Academic Libraries; Paper Presented at the First National Conference of the Association of College and Research Libraries, Boston, Massachusetts, November 8-11, 1978. K.G.Saur, New York, 1978; Gould, Constance, (1988).
63. Stone, Sue, (1982) reference to Jones, C, Chapman, M. and Carr Woods, P. “The Characteristics of the Literature Used by Historians,” Journal of Librarian-ship, 4, (1972):137-56.
64. Stone, Sue, (1982):306.
65. Saule, Mara R., “User Instruction Issues for Databases in the Humanities,” Library Trends 40, no.4 (Spring 1992):612.
66. Katzen, May, “Application of Computers in the Humanities,” Information Processing and Management 22 (1986):264.
67. Crawford (1986), p.571.
68. Hoogcarspel (1994), p.33.
69. Crawford, David, (1986):570.
70. Schwartz, Charles A., “Scholarly Communication as a Loosely Coupled System: Reassessing Prospects for Structural Reform,” College and Research Libraries 55, no.2 (March 1994):108.
71. Mackesy, Eileen M., “Perspective on Secondary Access Services in the Humanities,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 33, no.3 (May 1982): 151.
72. Stone, Sue, (1982):306.
73. Crawford, David, (1986):572.
74. Price-Wilkins, John and others, “Text Files in Libraries: Present Foundations and Future Directions,” Library Hi Tech 9, no.3 (1991).
75. Crawford, David, (1986):574.
76. Krol, Ed. The Whole Internet; User’s Guide and Catalog. O’Reilly & Associates, Inc., Sebastopol, 1994:350.
77. Wiberley, Stephen E. Jr., “Habits of Humanists: Scholarly Behavior and New Information Technologies,” Library Hi Tech 9 no. 1 (1991):19.
78. Schwartz, Charles A., (1994): 112.
79. Lynch, Clifford A., “Rethinking the Integrity of the Scholarly Record in the Networked Information Age,” Educom Review 29, no.2 (March/April 1994):39.
80. Pankake, Marcia, (1991):13.
81. Plum, Terry and Topsy N. Smalley, “Research as Repatriation,” The Reference Librarian 47 (Summer 1994).
82. Stone, Sue, (1982):304.
83. Stone, Sue, (1982):305.
84. Stone, Sue, (1982):305.
85. Becher, Tony, Academic Tribes and Territories; Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines. The Society for Research into higher Education & Open University Press, Stony Stratford, 1989:138.