A randomised controlled trial of computerised cognitive behaviour therapy for the treatment of depression in primary care: The Randomised Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Acceptability of Computerised Therapy (REEACT) trial

Health Technology Assessment

Volumn 19, Issue 101, 2015, Pages 1-174

  Littlewood, Elizabeth ^a   Duarte, Ana ^a   Hewitt, Catherine ^a   Knowles, Sarah ^b,c   Palmer, Stephen ^a   Walker, Simon ^a   Andersen, Phil ^a   Araya, Ricardo ^d,e   Barkham, Michael ^f   Bower, Peter ^c   Brabyn, Sally ^a   Brierley, Gwen ^a,g   Cooper, Cindy ^f   Gask, Linda ^c   Kessler, David ^d   Lester, Helen ^c,h   Lovell, Karina ^c   Muhammad, Usman ^a   Parry, Glenys ^f   Richards, David A ^a,i   Richardson, Rachel ^a   Tallon, Debbie ^j   Tharmanathan, Puvan ^a   White, David ^f   Gilbody, Simon ^a   more..

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^e LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

^f UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^g UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^h UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF EXETER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^j UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COGNITIVE THERAPY; COMPUTER ASSISTED THERAPY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPRESSION; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL FEE; MENTAL HEALTH; MOTIVATION; MULTICENTER STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARALLEL DESIGN; PATIENT HEALTH QUESTIONNAIRE 9; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PROGRAM ACCEPTABILITY; PROGRAM COST EFFECTIVENESS; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TELECONSULTATION; UNITED KINGDOM; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DEPRESSIVE DISORDER, MAJOR; ECONOMICS; INTERNET; INTERVIEW; MIDDLE AGED; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; TELEPHONE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; COGNITIVE THERAPY; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DEPRESSIVE DISORDER, MAJOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; QUALITY OF LIFE; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL; TELEPHONE; THERAPY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84952028044     PISSN: 13665278     EISSN: 20464924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3310/hta191010     Document Type: Article

References (95)

1. WHO. The World Health Report (2001): Mental Health: New Understanding, New Hope. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2001.
2. Layard R. The case for psychological treatment centres. BMJ 2006;332:1030-2. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1136/bmj.332.7548.1030
3. Roth A, Fonagy P. What Works for Whom? A Critical Review of Psychotherapy Research. New York, NY: Guildford Press; 1996.
4. Department of Health. A Review of Strategic Policy on NHS Psychotherapy Services in England. London: HMSO, 1996.
5. Lovell K, Richards D. Multiple Access Points and Levels of Entry (MAPLE): ensuring choice, accessibility and equity for CBT services. Behav Cogn Psychother 2000;28:379-91.
6. Kaltenthaler E, Brazier J, De Nigris E, Tumur I, Ferriter M, Beverley C, et al. Computerised cognitive behaviour therapy for depression and anxiety update: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2006;10(33). http://dx.doi.org/10.3310/hta10330
7. Proudfoot J, Goldberg D, Mann A, Everitt B, Marks I, Gray JA. Computerized, interactive, multimedia cognitive-behavioural program for anxiety and depression in general practice. Psychol Med 2003;33:217-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291702007225
8. Christensen H, Griffiths KM, Jorm AF. Delivering interventions for depression by using the internet: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2004;328:265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.37945.566632.EE
9. Bower P, Gilbody S. Stepped care in psychological therapies: access, effectiveness and efficiency: narrative literature review. Br J Psychiatry 2005;186:11-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjp.186.1.11
10. Andersson G, Cuijpers P. Internet-based and other computerized psychological treatments for adult depression: a meta-analysis. Cogn Behav Ther 2009;38:196-205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 16506070903318960
11. Gilbody S, Littlewood E, Hewitt C, Brierley G, Tharmanathan P, Araya R, et al. Computerised cognitive behaviour therapy (cCBT) as treatment for depression in primary care (REEACT trial): large scale pragmatic randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2015;351:h5627. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ bmj.h5627
12. Torgerson D, Moffett JK. Patient preference and validity of randomized controlled trials: letter to the editor. JAMA 2005;294:41-2.
13. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JBW, Patient Health Questionnaire Study Group. Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study. JAMA 1999;282:1737-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.282.18.1737
14. Gilbody S, Richards D, Barkham M. Diagnosing depression in primary care using self-completed instruments: UK validation of PHQ-9 and CORE-OM. Br J Gen Pract 2007;57:650-2.
15. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Depression: Core Interventions in the Management of Depression in Primary and Secondary Care. London: HMSO; 2004.
16. Peveler R, Kendrick A, Buxton M, Longworth L, Baldwin D, Moore M, et al. A randomised controlled trial to compare the cost-effectiveness of tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and lofepramine. Health Technol Assess 2005;9(16).
17. BMA and NHS Employers. Revisions to the GMS Contract, 2006/7: Delivering Investment in General Practice. London: British Medical Association; 2006.
18. Whooley MA, Avins AL, Browner WS. Case-finding instruments for depression: two questions are as good as many. J Gen Intern Med 1997;12:439-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997. 00076.x
19. Lewis G, Pelosi AJ, Araya R, Dunn G. Measuring psychiatric disorder in the community: a standardized assessment for use by lay interviewers. Psychol Med 1992;22:465-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291700030415
20. Gruenberg AM, Goldstein RD, Pincus HA. Classification of Depression: Research and Diagnostic Criteria: DSM-IV and ICD-10. In Licinio J, Wong M-L, editors. Weinheim: Wiley; 2005.
21. Barkham M, Margison F, Leach C, Lucock M, Mellor-Clark J, Evans C, et al. Service profiling and outcomes benchmarking using the CORE-OM: toward practice-based evidence in the psychological therapies. J Consult Clin Psychol 2001;69:184-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.69.2.184
22. Evans C, Mellor-Clark J, Margison F, Barkham M, Audin K, Connell J, et al. CORE: clinical outcomes in routine evaluation. J Ment Health 2000;9:247-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713680250
23. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ 00005650-199206000-00002
24. Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Dewey JE. How to Score Version Two of the SF-36 Health Survey (Standard & Acute Forms). Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated; 2000.
25. The EuroQol Group. EuroQol - a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990;16:199-208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9
26. Brooks R. EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy 1996;37:53-72. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/0168-8510(96)00822-6
27. Knapp M, Beecham J. Costing mental health services. Psychol Med 1990;20:893-908. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S003329170003659X
28. Rosenberger WF, Lachin JM. Randomization in Clinical Trials: Theory and Practice. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/0471722103
29. King M, Sibbald B, Ward E, Bower P, Lloyd M, Gabbay M, et al. Randomised controlled trial of non-directive counselling, cognitive-behaviour therapy and usual general practitioner care in the management of depression as well as mixed anxiety and depression in primary care. Health Technol Assess 2000;4(19).
30. Simon G, Wagner E, Vonkorff M. Cost-effectiveness comparisons using 'real world' randomized trials: the case of new antidepressant drugs. J Clin Epidemiol 1995;48:363-73. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/0895-4356(94)00141-C
31. Christensen H, Griffiths KM, Korten A. Web-based cognitive behavior therapy: analysis of site usage and changes in depression and anxiety scores. J Med Internet Res 2002;4:e3. http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4.1.e3
32. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9. J Gen Intern Med 2001;16:606-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x
33. Pinto-Meza A, Serrano-Blanco A, Penarrubia MT, Blanco E, Haro JM. Assessing depression in primary care with the PHQ-9: can it be carried out over the telephone? J Gen Intern Med 2005;20:738-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0144.x
34. Clark DM, Layard R, Smithies R, Richards DA, Suckling R, Wright B. Improving access to psychological therapy: initial evaluation of two UK demonstration-sites. Behav Res Ther 2009;47:910-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2009.07.010
35. DeJesus RS, Vickers KS, Melin GJ, Williams MD. A system-based approach to depression management in primary care using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. Mayo Clin Proc 2007;82:1395-402. http://dx.doi.org/10.4065/82.11.1395
36. Fletcher J, Bower P, Richards D, Saunders T. Enhanced Services Specification for Depression Under the New GP Contract. Manchester: National Institute for Mental Health in England Northwest; 2004.
37. Cameron IM, Crawford JR, Lawton K, Reid IC. Psychometric comparison of PHQ-9 and HADS for measuring depression severity in primary care. Br J Gen Pract 2008;58:32-6. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.3399/bjgp08X263794
38. Löwe B, Kroenke K, Herzog W, Gräfe K. Measuring depression outcome with a brief self-report instrument: sensitivity to change of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). J Affect Disord 2004;81:61-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0327(03)00198-8
39. Evans C, Connell J, Barkham M, Margison F, McGrath G, Mellor-Clark J, et al. Towards a standardised brief outcome measure: psychometric properties and utility of the CORE-OM. Br J Psychiatry 2002;180:51-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjp.180.1.51
40. Cavanagh K, Shapiro DA, Berg S, Swain S, Barkham M, Proudfoot J. The effectiveness of computerized cognitive behavioural therapy in routine care. Br J Clin Psychol 2006;45:499-514. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/014466505X84782
41. Richards D, Lovell K, Gilbody S, Gask L, Torgerson D, Barkham M, et al. Collaborative care for depression in UK primary care: a randomized controlled trial. Psychol Med 2008;38:279-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291707001365
42. Garratt AM, Ruta DA, Abdalla MI, Buckingham JK, Russell IT. The SF-36 health survey questionnaire: an outcome measure suitable for routine use within the NHS? BMJ 1993;306:1440-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.306.6890.1440
43. Brazier JE, Harper R, Jones NM, O'Cathain A, Thomas KJ, Usherwood T, et al. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. BMJ 1992;305:160-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.305.6846.160
44. Cuijpers P, de Graaf R, van Dorsselaer S. Minor depression: risk profiles, functional disability, health care use and risk of developing major depression. J Affect Disord 2004;79:71-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0327(02)00348-8
45. Jenkinson C, Layte R, Lawrence K. Development and testing of the medical outcomes study 36-item short form health survey summary scale scores in the United Kingdom: results from a large-scale survey and a clinical trial. Med Care 1997;35:410-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ 00005650-199704000-00010
46. Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ 2002;21:271-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6296(01)00130-8
47. Brazier J, Usherwood T, Harper R, Thomas K. Deriving a preference-based single index from the UK SF-36 health survey. J Clin Epidemiol 1998;51:1115-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(98) 00103-6
48. Dolan P, Gudex C, Kind P, Williams A. A Social Tariff for EuroQoL: Results from a UK General Population Survey. CHE Discussion Paper. York: Centre for Health Economics; 1995.
49. Sobocki P, Ekman M, Ågren H, Krakau I, Runeson B, Mårtensson B, et al. Health-related quality of life measured with EQ-5D in patients treated for depression in primary care. Value Health 2007;10:153-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2006.00162.x
50. Kessler D, Lewis G, Kaur S, Wiles N, King M, Weich S, et al. Therapist-delivered Internet psychotherapy for depression in primary care: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2009;374:628-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61257-5
51. Sapin C, Fantino B, Nowicki M-L, Kind P. Usefulness of EQ-5D in assessing health status in primary care patients with major depressive disorder. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2004;2:20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-2-20
52. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2013.
53. Royston P. Multiple imputation of missing values. Stata Journal 2004;4:227-41.
54. Briggs AH, Claxton K, Sculpher MJ. Decision Modelling for Health Economic Evaluation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.
55. British Medical Association and Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain. British National Formulary [online]. London: BMA and RPS; 2013. URL: http://www.bnf.org/bnf/index.htm (accessed August 2013).
56. Curtis L. Unit Costs of Health Social Care 2012. Canterbury: PSSRU, University of Kent; 2012.
57. UK National Health System (NHS). NHS Reference Costs 2011-12. National Schedules of Reference Costs: NHS Own Costs; 2012. URL: www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/ attachment_data/file/127115/NSRC01-2011-12.xls (accessed August 2013).
58. The Wellness Shop. Beating the Blues Clinician's Pack, 2013. URL: www.thewellnessshop.co.uk/ PBSCCatalog.asp?ItmID=12969942 (accessed September 2013).
59. Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston, MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Centre; 1993.
60. Brazier J, Roberts J, Tsuchiya A, Busschbach J. A comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-6D across seven patient groups. Health Econ 2004;13:873-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hec.866
61. Torrance GW, Feeny D. Utilities and quality adjusted life years. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1989;5:559-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0266462300008461
62. Manca A, Hawkins N, Sculpher MJ. Estimating mean QALYs in trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis: the importance of controlling for baseline utility. Health Econ 2005;14:487-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hec.944
63. Briggs A, Clark T, Wolstenholme J, Clarke P. Missing … presumed at random: cost-analysis of incomplete data. Health Econ 2003;12:377-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hec.766
64. Royston P. Multiple imputation of missing values: update of ice. Stata Journal 2005;5:527-36.
65. Royston P. Multiple imputation of missing values: update. Stata Journal 2005;5:188-201.
66. White IR, Royston P, Wood AM. Multiple imputation using chained equations: issues and guidance for practice. Stat Med 2011;30:377-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.4067
67. Graham JW, Olchowski AE, Gilreath TD. How many imputations are really needed? Some practical clarifications of multiple imputation theory. Prev Sci 2007;8:206-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s11121-007-0070-9
68. Briggs A, Gray A. The distribution of health care costs and their statistical analysis for economic evaluation. J Health Serv Res Policy 1998;3:233.
69. Barber J, Thompson S. Multiple regression of cost data: use of generalised linear models. J Health Serv Res Policy 2004;9:197-204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1258/1355819042250249
70. Manning WG, Mullahy J. Estimating log models: to transform or not to transform? J Health Econ 2001;20:461-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6296(01)00086-8
71. Pullenayegum EM, Tarride J-E, Xie F, Goeree R, Gerstein HC, O'Reilly D. Analysis of health utility data when some subjects attain the Upper Bound of 1: are Tobit and CLAD models appropriate? Value Health 2010;13:487-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2010.00695.x
72. Zellner A. An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regressions and tests for aggregation bias. J Am Stat Assoc 1962;57:348-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01621459. 1962.10480664
73. Willan AR, Briggs AH, Hoch JS. Regression methods for covariate adjustment and subgroup analysis for non-censored cost-effectiveness data. Health Econ 2004;13:461-75. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1002/hec.843
74. Drummond M, Sculpher M, Torrance G, O'Brien B, Stoddart G. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.
75. Fenwick E, Claxton K, Sculpher M. Representing uncertainty: the role of cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. Health Econ 2001;10:779-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hec.635
76. Claxton K. The irrelevance of inference: a decision-making approach to the stochastic evaluation of health care technologies. J Health Econ 1999;18:341-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6296 (98)00039-3
77. Glick H, Doshi J, Sonnad S, Polsky D. Economic Evaluation in Clinical Trials. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2007.
78. Sculpher MJ, Claxton K, Drummond M, McCabe C. Whither trial-based economic evaluation for health care decision-making? Health Econ 2006;15:677-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hec.1093
79. Cuijpers P, van Straten A, van Schaik A, Andersson G. Psychological treatment of depression in primary care: a meta-analysis. Br J Gen Pract 2009;59:e51-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/ bjgp09X395139
80. Boeije H. A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Qual Quant 2002;36:391-409. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1020909529486
81. Kaltenthaler E, Sutcliffe P, Parry G, Beverley C, Rees A, Ferriter M. The acceptability to patients of computerized cognitive behaviour therapy for depression: a systematic review. Psychol Med 2008;38:1521-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291707002607
82. Kaltenthaler E, Parry G, Beverley C, Ferriter M. Computerised cognitive behaviour therapy for depression: systematic review. Br J Psychiatry 2008;193:181-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/ bjp.bp.106.025981
83. Edwards PJ, Roberts IG, Clarke MJ, DiGuiseppi C, Wentz R, Kwan I, et al. Methods to increase response rates to postal questionnaires. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;2:MR000008.
84. National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health. Depression, the Treatment and Management of Depression in Adults - National Clinical Practice Guideline 90. Updated edn. London: The British Psychological Society and the Royal College of Psychiatrists; 2010.
85. Knowles SE, Lovell K, Bower P, Gilbody S, Littlewood E, Lester H. Patient experience of computerised therapy for depression in primary care. BMJ Open 2015;5:e008581. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ bmjopen-2015-008581
86. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Depression: the Treatment and Management of Depression in Adults (Update). London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2009.
87. Torgerson D, Sibbald B. Understanding controlled trials. What is a patient preference trial? BMJ 1998;316:360. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.316.7128.360
88. Churchill R, Hunot V, Corney R, Knapp M, McGuire H, Tylee A, et al. A systematic review of controlled trials of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of brief psychological treatments for depression. Health Technol Assess 2001;5(35).
89. Bortolotti B, Menchetti M, Bellini F, Montaguti MB, Berardi D. Psychological interventions for major depression in primary care: a meta-analytic review of randomized controlled trials. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2008;30:293-302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2008.04.001
90. Andrews G, Cuijpers P, Craske MG, McEvoy P, Titov N. Computer therapy for the anxiety and depressive disorders is effective, acceptable and practical health care: a meta-analysis. PLOS ONE 2010;5:e13196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013196
91. Spek V, Cuijpers P, Nyklícek I, Riper H, Keyzer J, Pop V. Internet-based cognitive behaviour therapy for symptoms of depression and anxiety: a meta-analysis. Psychol Med 2007;37:319-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291706008944
92. Wright JH, Wright AS, Albano AM, Basco MR, Goldsmith LJ, Raffield T. Computer-assisted cognitive therapy for depression: Maintaining efficacy while reducing therapist time. Am J Psychiatry 2005;162:1158-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.162.6.1158
93. McCrone P, Knapp M, Proudfoot J, Ryden C, Cavanagh K, Shapiro DA, et al. Cost-effectiveness of computerised cognitive behaviour therapy for anxiety and depression in primary care: randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry 2004;185:55-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjp.185.1.55
94. Primary Care Foundation. Out of Hours Benchmark - Index and Summary, 2013. URL: www.primarycarefoundation.co.uk/benchmark-results-interact-with-data-and-reports.html (accessed September 2013).
95. Parry G, Barkham M, Brazier J, Dent-Brown K, Hardy G, Kendrick T, et al. An Evaluation of a New Service Model: Improving Access to Psychological Therapies demonstration-sites 2006-2009. Final report. NIHR Service Delivery and Organisation programme; 2011.