An opinion on imaging challenges in phenotyping field crops

Machine Vision and Applications

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 681-694

  Kelly, Derek ^a   Vatsa, Avimanyou ^b   Mayham, Wade ^b   Ngô, Linh ^a   Thompson, Addie ^c   Kazic, Toni ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^b University of Missouri   (United States)

^c PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Field phenotyping; Maize phenotypes; Organ assignment; Phenotype identification; Plant disambiguation; Registration; Segmentation; Species recognition

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER VISION; IMAGE SEGMENTATION;

MAIZE PHENOTYPES; ORGAN ASSIGNMENT; PHENOTYPE IDENTIFICATION; PHENOTYPING; PLANT DISAMBIGUATION; REGISTRATION; SPECIES RECOGNITION;

CROPS;

EID: 84951966535     PISSN: 09328092     EISSN: 14321769     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00138-015-0728-4     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. OECD-FAO.: OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2010–2019. Tech. Rep., Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development and U. N. Food and Agriculture Organization, 2010. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/agriculture-and-food/oecd-fao-agricultural-outlook-2010agroutlook-2010-en
2. Daschle, T., Clay, J., Luck, J., Oniang’o, R.K., Penn, J.B., and Sanchez, P.A.: Agricultural Innovation in the 21st Century. Special Report. Tech. rep., DuPont Advisory Committee on Agricultural Innovation and Productivity, 2013. http://www.slideshare.net/DuPont/agricultural-innovation-productivity-for-the-21st-century-17044720?fromaction=save
3. Global Harvest Initiative.: 2014 Global Agricultural Productivity Report. Global Harvest Initiative (2013)
4. Cuesta Roble Consulting.: International Greenhouse Vegetable Production-Statistics. Cuesta Roble Consulting (2015). http://www.cuestaroble.com/statistics.htm
5. United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service.: Crop Production: 2014 summary. United States Dept. of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service, Washington, DC (2015)
6. Araus, J.L., Cairns, J.E.: Field high-throughput phenotyping: the new crop breeding frontier. Trend. Plant Sci. 19, 52–61 (2014)
7. Campos, H., Cooper, M., Habben, J.E., Edmeades, G.O., Schussler, J.R.: Improving drought tolerance in maize: a view from industry. Field Crops. Res. 90, 19–34 (2004)
8. Pearl, R.: The personal equation in breeding experiments involving certain characters of maize. Biol. Bull. 21, 339–366 (1911)
9. Singh, A.S., Masuku, M.B.: An insight in statistical techniques and design in agricultural and applied research; lousy english. World J. Agric. Sci. 8, 568–584 (2012)
10. Stuber, C.W., Edwards, M.D., Wendel, J.F.: Molecular marker-facilitated investigations of quantitative trait loci in maize. II. Factors influencing yield and its component traits. Crop. Sci. 27, 639–648 (1987)
11. Biskup, B., Scharr, H., Schurr, U., Rascher, U.: A stereo imaging system for measuring structural parameters of plant canopies. Plant Cell Environ. 30, 1299–1308 (2007)
12. Burgos-Artizzu, X.P., Ribeiro, A., Guijarro, M., Pajares, G.: Real-time image processing for crop/weed discrimination in maize fields. Comput. Electron. Agric. 75, 337–346 (2011)
13. Kiani, S., Jafari, A.: Crop detection and positioning in the field using discriminant analysis and neural networks based on shape features. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 14, 755–765 (2012)
14. Montalvo, M., Pajares, G., Guerrero, J.M., Romeo, J., Guijarro, M., Ribeiro, A., Ruz, J.J., Cruz, J.M.: Automatic detection of crop rows in maize fields with high weeds pressure. Exp. Sys. Appl. 39, 11889–11897 (2012)
15. Peña, J.M., Torres-Sánchez, J., de Castro, A.I., Kelly, M., López- Granados, F.: Weed mapping in early-season maize fields using object-based analysis of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) images. PLoS One 8, e77151 (2013)
16. Romeo, J., Pajares, G., Montalvo, M., Guerrero, J.M., Guijarro, M., Ribeiro, A.: Crop row detection in maize fields inspired on the human visual perception. Sci. World J. 2012, 484390 (2012)
17. Minervini, M., Scharr, H., Tsaftaris, S.A.: Image analysis: the new bottleneck in plant phenotyping. IEEE Sig. Proc. Mag. 32(4), 126–131 (2015). doi:10.1109/MSP.2015.2434233
18. Furbank, R.T., Tester, M.: Phenomics—technologies to relieve the phenotyping bottleneck. Trends Plant Sci. 16, 635–644 (2011)
19. Großkinsky, D.K., Svensgaard, J., Christensen, S., Roitsch, T.: Plant phenomics and the need for physiological phenotyping across scales to narrow the genotype-to-phenotype knowledge gap. J. Exp. Bot. 66, 5429–5440 (2015)
20. Thompson, A.M., Crants, J., Schnable, P.S., Yu, J., Timmermans, M.C.P., Springer, N.M., Scanlon, M.J., Muehlbauer, G.J.: Genetic control of maize shoot apical meristem architecture. Genes Genom. Genet. 4, 1327–1337 (2014)
21. Kelly, D., Vatsa, A., Mayham, W., Kazic, T.: Extracting complex phenotypes from images. Mach. Vis. Appl. pp 1–12 (2015). doi:10.1007/s00138-015-0718-6
22. Bennetzen, J.L., Hake, S.C. (eds.). Handbook of Maize: Its Biology. vol. 1. Springer, New York (2009)
23. Neuffer, M.G., Edward H. Coe, Jr., Wessler, S.R.: Mutants of Maize. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor (CHS) (1997)
24. Vinã, A., Gitelson, A.A., Rundquist, D.C., Keydan, G., Leavitt, B., Schepers, J.: Monitoring aize (Zea mays l.) phenology with remote sensing. Agron. J. 96, 1139–1147 (2004)
25. Kaleita, A.L., Steward, B.L., Ewing, R.P., Ashlock, D.A., Westgate, M.E., Hatfield, J.L.: Novel analysis of hyperspectral reflectance data for detecting onset of pollen shed in maize. Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Biol. Eng. 49, 1947–1954 (2006)
26. Frasson, R.P., Krajewski, W.F.: Three-dimensional digital model of a maize plant. Agric. For. Meterol. 150, 478–488 (2010)
27. Chéné, Y., Rousseau, D., Lucidarme, P., Bertheloot, J., Caffier, V., Morel, P., Belin, É., Chapeau-Blondeau, F.: On the use of depth camera for 3D phenotyping of entire plants. Comput. Electron. Agric. 82, 122–127 (2012)
28. Dixon, M., Abrams, A., Jacobs, N., Pless, R.: On analyzing video with very small motions. In: IEEE Computer Society (ed.), The 24th IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2011, Colorado Springs, CO, USA, 20-25 June 2011, New York, pp. 425–432, IEEE Computer Society Press (2011)
29. MaizeGDB.: MaizeGDB. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service (2003–present). http://www.maizegdb.org/
30. White, J.W., et al.: Field-based phenomics for plant genetics research. Field Crops Res. 133, 101–112 (2012)
31. Liebisch, F., Kirchgessner, N., Schneider, D., Walter, A., Hund, A.: Remote, aerial phenotyping of maize traits with a mobile multi-sensor approach. Plant Meth. 11, 9 (2015)
32. Li, L., Zhang, Q., Huang, D.: A review of imaging techniques for plant phenotyping. Sensors 14, 20078–20111 (2014)
33. Sawers, R.J.H., Sheehan, M.J., Brutnell, T.P.: Cereal phytochromes: targets of selection, targets for manipulation? Trends Plant Sci. 10, 138–143 (2005)
34. Martin, D.P., Rybicki, E.P.: Microcomputer-based quantification of maize streak virus symptoms in Zea mays. Phytopathology 88, 422–427 (1988)
35. Foard, A., et al.: Collection of quantitative images of leaves in the field and greenhouse. Maize Genet. Coop. News. 82, 13–15 (2008)
36. Barbedo, J.G.A.: An automatic method to detect and measure leaf disease symptoms using digital image processing. Plant Dis. 98, 1709–1716 (2014)
37. Spalding, E.P., Miller, N.D.: Image analysis is driving a renaissance in growth measurement. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 16, 100–104 (2013)
38. MaizeGDB.: MaizeGDB Phenotype Record Page: 107757. MaizeGDB (2015–present). http://www.maizegdb.org/data_center/phenotype?id=107757
39. Neuffer, M.G.: First Report of Shredded Leaf Phenotype. MaizeGDB (1995). http://www.maizegdb.org/data_center/reference?id=106353
40. Trimnell, M., Albertsen, M.C., Noble Jr, S.W.: New leaf mutation shr*-JH87, shredded leaf. Maize Genet. Coop. News. 74, 36 (2000)
41. Kazic, T.: Ten simple rules for experiments’ provenance. PLoS Comput. Biol. 11, e1004384 (2015). doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004384
42. LemnaTec GmbH.: LemnaTec. LemnaTec GmbH (2012–present). http://www.lemnatec.com
43. Altinas, I., Berkley, C., Jaeger, E., Jones, M.B., Ludäscher, B., Mock, S.: Kepler: an extensible system for design and execution of scientific workflows. In: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on scientific and statistical database management (SSDBM’04), Santa Barbara, CA, IEEE (2005)
44. BioMOBY.org.: Moby. BioMOBY.org (2005). http://www.biomoby.org
45. myGrid Developers.: myGrid. mygrid.org.uk (2014–present). http://www.mygrid.org.uk
46. Goble, C.A., Stevens, R., Ng, G., Bechhofer, S., Paton, N.W., Baker, P.G., Peim, M., Brass, A.: Transparent access to multiple bioinformatics information sources. IBM Syst. J. 40, 532–552 (2001)
47. Hull, D., Wolstencroft, K., Stevens, R., Goble, C., Pocock, M.R., Li, P., Oinn, T.: Taverna: a tool for building and running workflows of services. Nucl. Acids Res. 34, W729–W732 (2006)
48. The Pegasus Project.: Pegasus Workflow Management System. Information Sciences Institute, University of Southern California (2015–present). http://Pegasus.isi.edu
49. iPlant Collaborative.: iPlant Collaborative. Empowering a New Plant Biology. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory and University of Arizona (2008–present). http://iplantcollaborative.org/