New approaches for school design

The SAGE Handbook of Educational Leadership: Advances in Theory, Research, and Practice, First Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 506-537

  Lackney, Jeffery A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84951910432     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781412976091.n21     Document Type: Chapter

References (121)

1. Allen, I. L.A retrospective note on urban "neighborhood school" ideology. Urban Education 12 (2) (1977). 205-212.
2. American Institutes of Research. (1999). An educators' guide to schoolwide reform. Arlington, VA: Educational Research Service.
3. American Lung Association. (2002). Asthma in children fact sheet. New York: Author.Retrieved August 22, 2003, from http://www.lungusa.org/asthma/ascpedfac99.html
4. Arnold, D. (1997, June). Taking control. School Planning and Management, pp. 20-21, 24.
5. Association of School Business Officials International. (2002). Planning guide for maintaining school facilities. Washington, DC: National Forum on Education Statistics and author.
6. Barker, R. G., & Gump, P. V. (1964). Big school, small school. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
7. Beaumont, C. E. (2003, May). Historic neighborhood schools deliver 21st-century education. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse on Educational Facilities.
8. Berner, M. M.Building conditions, parental involvement, and student achievement in the District of Columbia public school system. Urban Education 28 (1) (1993, April). 6-29.
9. Bingler, S., Quinn, L., & Sullivan, K. (2003, December). Schools as centers of community: A citizen's guide for planning and design (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
10. Bittle, E. H. (Ed.). (1996). Planning and financing school improvement and construction projects. Topeka, KS: National Organization on Legal Problems in Education.
11. Boer, H., & Karanovich, F. (2000, September-October). How are your buildings smart? Illinois School Board Journal. Springfield: Illinois School Board Association.
12. Brubaker, C. W. (1998). Planning and designing schools. New York: Mc Graw-Hill.
13. Burt, T. S. (2000). Acoustic environment: Responses to sound. In J. D.Spengler, J. M.Samet, & J. F.McCarthy (Eds.), Indoor air quality handbook (pp. 19.1-19.23). New York: Mc Graw-Hill.
14. Caffarella, R. S. O'Donnell, J. M.Self-directed adult learning: A critical paradigm revisited. Adult Education Quarterly 37 (4) (1987). 99-107.
15. Cash, C. S. (1993). Building condition and student achievement and behavior. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg.
16. Cervantes, R. P. (1999). The relationship between the school building condition and academic achievement and behavior of students in selected Alabama public schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Alabama at Birmingham.
17. Clark, T. (2001, October). Virtual high schools: Trends and issues. Macomb: Western Illinois University, College of Education and Human Services, Center for the Application of Information Technologies.
18. Clark, T., & Else, D. (1998). Distance learning, electronic networking, and school policy (Fastback No. 441). Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.
19. Collaborative for High Performance Schools. (2002). High performance schools best practice manual: Vol. 1. Planning. California: Author.
20. Cook, A. (2000). The transformation of one large urban high school: The Julia Richman Education Complex. In E.Clinchy (Ed.), Creating new schools: How small schools are changing American education. New York: Teachers College Press.
21. Costa, A. L., & Liebmann, R. M. (Eds.). (1997). The process-centered school: Sustaining a renaissance community. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
22. Cotton, K. (1996). Affective and social benefits of small-scale schooling. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service EDO-RC-96-5)
23. Davidson, J.Innovative school design for small learning communities. Horace 8 (1) (2001, Fall). 1-7, 9, 11-14.
24. Decker, L. E., & Romney, V. A. (1994). Educational restructuring and the community education process. Fairfax, VA: National Community Education Association.
25. Dede, C.The evolution of distance education: Emerging technologies and distributed learning. American Journal of Distance Education 10 (2) (1996). 4-36.
26. Dewees, S. (1999). The school-within-a-school model (ERIC Digest, ED 438 147). Charleston, WV: ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools.
27. De Young, A. J. (1989). Economics and American education: A historical and critical overview of the impact of economic theories on schooling in the United States. New York: Longman.
28. Duke, D. (1998). Does it matter where our children learn? Unpublished manuscript, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Thomas Jefferson Center for Educational Design.
29. Duke, D., & Trautvetter, S. (2001). Reducing the negative effects of large schools. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse on Educational Facilities.
30. Earthman, G. I. (2000). Planning educational facilities for the next century. Reston, VA: Association of School Business Officials International.
31. Earthman, G. (2002, October). Planning a research agenda for the next decade. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the International Society of Educational Planning, Istanbul, Turkey.
32. Earthman, G. I. Cash, C. S. Van Berkum, D.A statewide study of the relationship between building condition and student achievement. Journal of School Business Management 8 (3) (1996). 26-37.
33. Ehrenkrantz, E. (1999, September). Planning for flexibility, not obsolescence. Designshare, Inc. Retrieved from http://www.designshare.com/Research/EEK/Enrenkrantz1.htm
34. Environmental Protection Agency. (2000, August). Indoor air quality and student performance (EPA Report 402-F-00-009). Washington, DC: Author.Retrieved August 22, 2003, from http://www.epa.gov/iaq/schools/performance.html
35. Evans, G. W., Kliewer, W., & Martin, J. (1991). The role of the physical environment in the health and well-being of children. In H. E.Schroeder (Ed.), New directions in health psychology assessment (pp. 127-157). New York: Hemisphere.
36. Evans, G. W. Maxwell, L.Chronic noise exposure and reading deficits: The mediating effects of language acquisition. Environment and Behavior 29 (5) (1997). 638-656.
37. Fielding, R. (1999, December). Wired versus wireless: Technology in school computer networks (a debate between Prakash Nair and Glenn Meeks). Retrieved August 21, 2003, from http://www.designshare.com/Research/Wired/Wired1.htm
38. Fowler, W. Walberg, H. J.School size, characteristics, and outcomes. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 13 (2) (1991). 189-202.
39. Frazier, L. M. (1993, May). Deteriorating school facilities and student learning. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 356 564)
40. Freedman, G., Darrow, R., & Watson, J. (2002). The California virtual school report: A national survey of virtual education practice and policy with recommendations for the state of California (University of California College Preparatory Initiative). Santa Cruz: University of California, Santa Cruz.
41. Galinsky, E., & Bond, J. T. (1998). The 1998 business work-life study: A sourcebook. New York: Families and Work Institute.
42. Garbarino, J.Some thoughts on school size and its effects on adolescent development. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 9 (1980). 19-31.
43. General Accounting Office. (1995). School facilities: Condition of America's schools (GAO/HEHS-95-61). Washington, DC: Author.
44. General Accounting Office. (2000). School facilities: Construction expenditures have grown significantly in recent years (GAO/HEHS-00-41). Washington, DC: Author.
45. George, P. S., & Alexander, W. M. (1993). The exemplary middle school. Fort Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
46. Goddard, E., Loudat, N. B., Purwin, T., Rogers, A., Schmitt, C., & Vinson, M. (2002). Technology in schools: Suggestions, tools, and guidelines for assessing technology in elementary and secondary education (NCES 2003-313). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
47. Gravelle, C. M. (1998). The relationship between student achievement and school building conditions in public school districts in Idaho. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Idaho.
48. Graves, B. E. (1993). School ways: The planning and design of America's schools. New York: Mc Graw-Hill.
49. Grow, G. O.Teaching learners to be self-directed. Adult Education Quarterly 41 (3) (1991). 125-149.
50. Gulliford, A. (1996). America's country schools (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Preservation Press.
51. Gump, P. V. (1987). School and classroom environments. In D.Stokols & I.Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 691-732). New York: John Wiley.
52. Guy, L. G. (2001). Student achievement and school condition: Examining the relationship in West Virginia high schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, West Virginia University, Morgantown.
53. Hathaway, W. E.Effects of school lighting on physical development and school performance. Journal of Educational Research 88 (4) (1995). 228-242.
54. Hawkins, H. L. Overbaugh, B. L.The interface between facilities and learning. The Educational Facility Planner 26 (4) (1988). 4-7.
55. Hawkins, H. L., & Lilley, E. H. (1998). Guide to school facility appraisal. Phoenix, AZ: Council of Educational Facility Planners International.
56. Herbst, J. (1996). The once and future school: Three hundred and fifty years of American secondary education. New York: Routledge.doi:10.4324/9780203344699 http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203344699
57. Heschong, L. Knecht, C.Daylighting makes a difference. Educational Facility Planner 37 (2) (2003). 5-14.
58. Holcomb, J. H. (1995). A guide to the planning of educational facilities. New York: University Press of America.
59. Huse, D.Restructuring and the physical context: Designing learning environments. Children's Environment 12 (3) (1995). 290-310.
60. Irmsher, K. (1997). School size. (ERIC Digest, Number 113). Eugene, OR: ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management. (ERICE Document Reproduction Service No. ERICED 414615 97)
61. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1999). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
62. Johnson, S. M. (1990). Teachers at work: Achieving success in our schools. New York: Basic Books.
63. Kats, G., Alevantis, L., Berman, A., Mills, E., & Perlman, J. (2003, October). The costs and benefits of green buildings: Report to California's Sustainable Buildings Task Force. Sacramento: California Department of Health Services and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
64. Kleiner, A., & Farris, E. (2002). Internet access in U.S. public schools and classrooms: 1994-2001 (Report No. NCES 2002-018). Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics.
65. Lackney, J. A. (1994). Educational facilities: The impact and role of the physical environment of the school on teaching, learning, and educational outcomes. (Report R94-4). Milwaukee: University of Wisconsin, Center for Architecture and Urban Planning Research.
66. Lackney, J. A. (1999, March). Changing patterns in educational facilities: Design Share, Inc. Retrieved December 2004, from http://www.designshare.com/Research/ChangingPatterns/ChangingPatterns1.htm
67. Lackney, J. A. (2003, February). Thirty-three educational design principles for schools and community learning centers. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Educational Facilities.
68. Lanham, J. W., III(1999). Relating building and classroom conditions to student achievement in Virginia's elementary schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg.
69. Lashway, L. (1998-1999, Winter). School size: Is smaller better? Research Roundup, 15 (2). Eugene, OR: ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management.
70. Lawrence, B. K., Bingler, S., Diamond, B. M., Hill, B., Hoffman, J. L., Howley, C. B., Mitchell, S., Rudolph, D., & Washor, E. (2002). Dollars and sense: The cost effectiveness of small schools. Columbus, OH: Knowledge Works Foundation.
71. Lee, V. Ready, D. Johnson, D.The difficulty of identifying rare samples to study: The case of high schools divided into schools within schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 23 (4) (2001). 365-379.
72. Levine, E. (2002). One kid at a time: Big lessons from a small school. New York: Teachers College Press.
73. Lewis, L., Snow, K., Farris, E., Smerdon, B., Cronen, S., & Kaplan, J. (2000). Condition of America's public school facilities: 1999 (Report No. NCES 2000-032). Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics.
74. Lewis, M. (2001). Facility conditions and student test performance in the Milwaukee public schools. Scottsdale, AZ: Council of Educational Facility Planners International.
75. Lezotte, L. W. (1991). Correlates of an effective school: First and second generation. Okemos, MI: Effective Schools Products.
76. Marks, J. (2000, June). The Educational Facilities Laboratories (EFL): A history. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Educational Facilities.
77. Marshall, H. H.Open classrooms: Has the term outlived its usefulness? Review of Educational Research 51 (2) (1981). 181-192.
78. Maxwell, L. E. (1999). School building renovation and student performance: One district's experience. Scottsdale, AZ: Council of Educational Facility Planners International.
79. McAndrews, T., & Anderson, W. (2002, January). Schools within schools (ERIC Digest 154). Eugene: University of Oregon, Clearinghouse on Educational Management.
80. McClintock, J., & Mc Clintock, R. (1970). Henry Barnard's school architecture. New York: Teachers College Press.
81. McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (2002). Cradle to cradle: Remaking the way we make things. New York: North Point Press.
82. McGuffy, C. (1982). Facilities. In H. J.Walberg (Ed.), Improving educational standards and productivity (pp. 237-288). Berkeley, CA: Mc Cutchan.
83. Meek, A. (Ed.). (1995). Designing places for learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
84. Miller, N. L. (1995). The healthy school handbook: Conquering the sick building syndrome and other environmental hazards in and around your school. Washington, DC: National Education Association.
85. Moore, G. T. Lackney, J. A.School design: Crisis, educational performance, and design patterns. Children's Environments 10 (2) (1993). 99-112.
86. Myers, N., & Robertson, S. (2004). Creating connections: The CEFPI guide to educational facility planning. Scottsdale, AZ: Council of Educational Facility Planners International.
87. Nair, P. (2002, October). The role of wireless computing technology in the design of schools. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse on Educational Facilities.
88. Nathan, J., & Febey, K. (2001). Smaller, safer, saner, successful schools. Minneapolis: Humphrey Institute of the University of Minnesota, Center for School Change.
89. National Education Association. (2000). Modernizing our schools: What will it cost?Washington, DC: Author.
90. Nelson, P. B. (2003, February). Sound in the classroom: Why children need quiet. ASHRAE Journal, pp. 22-25.
91. New Schools, Better Neighborhoods. (2004, Spring). Schools as centers of communities (Knowledgeworks Foundation Concept Paper). Los Angeles: Author.
92. O'Halloran, K. (1994, Spring). Why lock the doors at three o'clock? Innovative community uses for the neighborhood school (Issues in Brief). Philadelphia: Pew Charitable Trusts. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED372478)
93. O'Neill, D. J. (2000, August). The impact of school facilities on student achievement, behavior, attendance, and teacher turnover rate at selected Texas middle schools in Region XIII ESC. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University.
94. Orfield, G. (1996). Turning back to segregation. In G.Orfield, S.Eaton, & The Harvard Project on Desegregation (Eds.), Dismantling desegregation: The quiet reversal of Brown v. Board of Education (pp. 1-22). New York: The New Press.
95. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (1989). Schools and quality: An international report. Paris: Author.
96. Orr, D. (1994). Earth in mind: On education, environment, and the human prospect. Washington, DC: Island Press.
97. Oxley, D.Organizing schools in small units: Alternatives to homogeneous grouping. Phi Delta Kappan 75 (7) (1994). 621.
98. Raywid, M. A. (1996). Taking stock: The movement to create mini-schools, schools-within-schools, and separate small schools (Urban Diversity Series No 108). New York: Columbia University, Teachers College, ERIC Clearinghouse on Urban Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 396 045)
99. Raywid, M. (1999). Current literature on small schools. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service EDO-RC-98-8)
100. Rieselbach, A. (1992). Building and learning. In New schools for New York: Plans and precedents for small schools. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
101. Rothenberg, J.The open classroom reconsidered. Elementary School Journal 90 (1) (1989). 69-86.
102. Sanoff, H. (1994). School design. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
103. Sanoff, H. (2001). School building assessment methods. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Educational Facilities.
104. Sanoff, H. (2002). Schools designed with community participation. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Educational Facilities.
105. Schneider, M. (2002, November). Do school facilities affect academic outcomes?Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Educational Facilities.
106. Shein, E. H. (1997). Organizational culture and leadership (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
107. Stine, S. (1997). Landscapes for learning: Creating outdoor environments for children and youth. New York: John Wiley.
108. Sustainable Buildings Industry Council. (2001). High-performance school buildings: Resource and strategy guide. Washington, DC: Author.
109. Tanner, K., & Lackney, J. (2005). Educational architecture: School facilities planning, design, construction, and management. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
110. Tanner, L. N. (1997). Dewey's Laboratory School: Lessons for today. New York: Teachers College Press.
111. Taylor, A.The learning environment as a three-dimensional textbook. Children's Environments 10 (2) (1993). 170-179.
112. Testa, K. C. (2000). Development of joint-use educational facility agreements between California public school districts and community entities: A cross-case analysis of strategic practices, barriers, and supportive elements. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of La Verne, California.
113. Tiller, D. K. (2000). Lighting recommendations. In J. D.Spengler, J. M.Samet, & J. F.McCarthy (Eds.), Indoor air quality handbook (pp. 18.1-18.22). New York: Mc Graw-Hill.
114. U.S. Green Building Council. (2003, February). Building momentum: National trends and prospects for high-performance green buildings. Washington, DC: Author.
115. Wagner, T. (2002). Making the grade: Reinventing America's schools. New York: Routledge Falmer.
116. Ward, D. (2001, April). Sustainable funding: What to do before the money runs out. School Planning and Management, pp. 71-72, 74-75.
117. Washor, E. (2002, August). Translating innovative pedagogical designs into school facilities designs. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Johnson and Wales University, Providence, RI.
118. Weinstein, C. S.The physical environment of the school: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research 49 (4) (1979). 577-610.
119. Weinstein, C. S. (1996). Secondary classroom management: Lessons from research and practice. New York: Mc Graw-Hill.
120. Wolff, S. J. (2001, September). Sustaining systems of relationships: The essence of the physical learning environment that supports and enhances collaborative, project-based learning at the community college level. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Oregon State University, School of Education.
121. Wyon, D. P. (1991). The ergonomics of healthy buildings: Overcoming barriers to productivity. In IAQ '91: Post-conference proceedings (pp. 43-46). Atlanta, GA: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers.