Rogue decryption failures: Reconciling AE robustness notions

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 9496, Issue , 2015, Pages 94-111

  Barwell, Guy ^a   Page, Daniel ^a   Stam, Martijn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Authenticated encryption; Multiple errors; Provable security; Robustness; Unverified plaintext

Indexed keywords

AUTHENTICATION; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS); SECURITY OF DATA;

ALL OR NOTHINGS; AUTHENTICATED ENCRYPTION; AUTHENTICATED ENCRYPTION SCHEME; DECRYPTION FAILURES; PLAINTEXT; PROVABLE SECURITY; REFERENCE MODELING; SUBTLE INTERACTION;

CRYPTOGRAPHY;

EID: 84951869766     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-27239-9_6     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Abed, F., Forler, C., List, E., Lucks, S., Wenzel, J.: Don’t panic! the cryptographers’ guide to robust authenticated (On-line) encryption. Comments to CAESAR mailing list (2015)
2. Andreeva, E., Bogdanov, A., Luykx, A., Mennink, B., Mouha, N., Yasuda, K.: How to securely release unverified plaintext in authenticated encryption. In: Sarkar, P., Iwata, T. (eds.) ASIACRYPT 2014. LNCS, vol. 8873, pp. 105–125. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)
3. Barwell, G., Page, D., Stam, M.: Rogue decryption failures: reconciling AE robustness notions (2015). http://eprint.iacr.org/2015/895
4. Bernstein, D.J.: CAESAR competition call (2013). http://competitions.cr.yp.to/caesar-call-3.html
5. Bleichenbacher, D.: Chosen ciphertext attacks against protocols based on the RSA encryption standard PKCS #1. In: Krawczyk, H. (ed.) CRYPTO 1998. LNCS, vol. 1462, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)
6. Boldyreva, A., Degabriele, J.P., Paterson, K.G., Stam, M.: On symmetric encryption with distinguishable decryption failures. In: Moriai, S. (ed.) FSE 2013. LNCS, vol. 8424, pp. 367–390. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)
7. Davies, G.T., Stam, M.: KDM security in the hybrid framework. In: Benaloh, J. (ed.) CT-RSA 2014. LNCS, vol. 8366, pp. 461–480. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)
8. Dent, A.W.: A designer’s guide to KEMs. In: Paterson, K.G. (ed.) Cryptography and Coding 2003. LNCS, vol. 2898, pp. 133–151. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
9. Dodis, Y., Pietrzak, K.: Leakage-resilient pseudorandom functions and side-channel attacks on Feistel networks. In: Rabin, T. (ed.) CRYPTO 2010. LNCS, vol. 6223, pp. 21–40. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
10. Dziembowski, S., Pietrzak, K.: Leakage-resilient cryptography. In: 49th FOCS, pp. 293–302. IEEE Computer Society Press (2008)
11. Hoang, V.T., Krovetz, T., Rogaway, P.: Robust authenticated-encryption AEZ and the problem that it solves. In: Oswald, E., Fischlin, M. (eds.) EUROCRYPT 2015. LNCS, vol. 9056, pp. 15–44. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)
12. Hoang, V.T., Reyhanitabar, R., Rogaway, P., Vizár, D.: Online authenticatedencryption and its nonce-reuse misuse-resistance. In: Proceedings of CRYPTO (2015). http://eprint.iacr.org/2015/189
13. Namprempre, C., Rogaway, P., Shrimpton, T.: Reconsidering generic composition. In: Nguyen, P.Q., Oswald, E. (eds.) EUROCRYPT 2014. LNCS, vol. 8441, pp. 257–274. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)
14. Rogaway, P.: Authenticated-encryption with associated-data. In: Atluri, V. (ed.) ACM CCS 2002, pp. 98–107. ACM Press (2002)
15. Rogaway, P.: Nonce-based symmetric encryption. In: Roy, B., Meier,W. (eds.) FSE 2004. LNCS, vol. 3017, pp. 348–359. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
16. Rogaway, P., Shrimpton, T.: A provable-security treatment of the key-wrap problem. In: Vaudenay, S. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2006. LNCS, vol. 4004, pp. 373–390. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
17. Sleevi, R., Watson, M.: Web cryptography API. W3C candidate recommendation (2014). http://www.w3.org/TR/WebCryptoAPI/
18. Vaudenay, S.: Security flaws induced by CBC padding-applications to SSL, IPSEC, WTLS. In: Knudsen, L.R. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2002. LNCS, vol. 2332, pp. 534–546. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)