The dynamic relationship between house prices and output: evidence from US metropolitan areas

International Journal of Strategic Property Management

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 336-345

  Apergis, Nicholas ^a   Simo Kengne, Beatrice D ^b   Gupta, Rangan ^b   Chang, Tsangyao ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PIRAEUS   (Greece)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA   (South Africa)

^c FENG CHIA UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Panel causality; Panel cointegration; Real house prices; Real personal income per capita

Indexed keywords

EID: 84951833451     PISSN: 1648715X     EISSN: 16489179     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3846/1648715X.2015.1072857     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. J.Abraham, ; P.Hendershott, 1996. Bubbles in metropolitan housing markets, Journal of Housing Research 7: 191–207.
2. J.Breitung, 2000. The local power of some unit root tests for panel data, in B.Baltagi, ; T.B.Fomby, ; R.C.Hill, (Eds.), Advances in Econometrics: Nonstationary Panels, Cointegration in Panels and Dynamic Panels 15: 161–178. JAI: Amsterdam. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0731-9053(00)15006-6
3. J.Y.Campbell, ; P.Perron, 1991. Pitfalls and opportunities: what macroeconomists should know about unit roots, in O.J.Blanchard, ; S.Fisher, (Eds.). NBER macroeconomic annual, MIT Cambridge, 141–201.
4. D.R.Capozza, ; P.H.Hendershott, ; C.Mack, ; C.J.Mayer, 2002. Determinants of real house price dynamics, NBER Working Paper 9262.
5. M.Demary, 2010. The interplay between output, inflation, interest rates and house prices: international evidence, Journal of Property Research 27(1): 1–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09599916.2010.499015
6. D.A.Dickey, ; W.A.Fuller, 1981. Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root, Econometrica 49: 1057–1072. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1912517
7. F.Emirmahmutoglu, ; N.Kose, 2011. Testing for Granger causality in heterogeneous mixed panels, Economic Modelling 28: 870–876. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2010.10.018
8. J.Gallin, 2006. The long run relationship between house prices and income: evidence from local housing markets, Real Estate Economics 34(3): 417–438. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6229.2006.00172.x
9. K.Hadri, 2000. Testing for stationarity in heterogeneous panel data, Econometric Journal 3: 148–161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1368-423X.00043
10. R.D.F.Harris, ; E.Tzavalis, 1999. Inference for unit roots in dynamic panels where the time dimension is fixed, Journal of Econometrics 91: 201–226. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00076-1
11. A.Hepşen, ; M.Vatansever, 2012. Relationship between residential property price index and macroeconomic indicators in Dubai housing market, International Journal of Strategic Property Management 16(1): 71–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/1648715X.2011.602756
12. C.Hurlin, 2004. Testing Granger causality in heterogeneous panel data models with fixed coefficients. Mimeo: University Paris IX.
13. C.Hurlin, ; B.Venet, 2001. Granger causality tests in panel data models with fixed coefficients. Mimeo: University Paris IX.
14. M.Hwang, ; J.M.Quigley, 2006. Economic fundamentals in local housing markets: evidence from US metropolitan regions, Journal of Regional Science 46(3): 425–453. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2006.00480.x
15. M.Iacoviello, 2011. Housing wealth and consumption, International Finance Discussion Paper 1027, Federal Reserve Board.
16. S.Johansen, 1991. Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegration vectors in Gaussian vector autoregressive models, Econometrica 59: 1551–1580. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2938278
17. G.D.Jud, ; T.Winkler, 2002. The dynamics of metropolitan housing prices, Journal of Real Estate Research 23(1-2): 29–45.
18. C.Kao, 1999. Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data, Journal of Econometrics 90: 1–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00023-2
19. A.B.Kennickell, ; M.Starr-McCluer, ; B.J.Surette, 2000. Recent changes in US family finances: results from the 1998 survey of consumer finances, Federal Reserve Bulletin 86(1): 1–29.
20. L.Kónya, 2006. Exports and growth: Granger causality analysis on OEC D countries with a panel data approach, Economic Modelling 23: 978–992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2006.04.008
21. D.Kwiatkowski, ; P.C.B.Phillips, ; P.Schmidt, ; Y.Shin, 1992. Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: how sure are we that economic time series have a unit root?, Journal of Econometrics 54: 159–178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(92)90104-Y
22. H.H.Lean, ; R.Smyth, 2014. Dynamic interaction between house prices and stock prices in Malaysia, International Journal of Strategic Property Management 18(2): 163–177. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/1648715X.2014.925006
23. A.Levin, ; C.F.Lin, 1993. Unit root tests in panel data: new results, Discussion Paper No. 56. University of California at San Diego (UCSD).
24. G.S.Maddala, ; S.Wu, 1999. A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test, Oxford Bulleting of Economics and Statistics 61: 631–652. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.61.s1.13
25. G.Meen, 2002. The time series behavior of house prices: a transatlantic divide?, Journal of Housing Economics 11: 1–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jhec.2001.0307
26. N.Miller, ; L.Peng, ; M.Sklarz, 2011. House prices and economic growth, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 42(4): 522–541. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11146-009-9197-8
27. W.Nyakabawo, ; S.M.Miller, ; M.Balcilar, ; S.Das, ; R.Gupta, 2013. Temporal causality between house prices and output in the US: a Bosstrap Rolling-Window approach, Department of Economics Working Paper 2013–29, University of Pretoria.
28. J.Nyblom, ; A.Harvey, 2000. Tests of common stochastic trends, Econometric Theory 16: 176–199. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0266466600162024
29. P.Pedroni, 2001. Purchasing power parity tests in cointegrated panels, Review of Economics and Statistics 83: 727–731. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/003465301753237803
30. P.Pedroni, 2004. Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis, Economics Theory 20: 597–625. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0266466604203073
31. M.H.Pesaran, 2004. General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. University of Cambridge, Faculty of Economics, Cambridge Working Papers in Economics No. 0435.
32. M.H.Pesaran, 2006. Estimation and inference in large heterogeneous panels with multifactor error structure, Econometrica 74 (4): 967–1012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00692.x
33. M.H.Pesaran, ; T.Yamagata, 2005. Testing slope homogeneity in large panels, CESIFO Working Paper No. 1438.