T-Recs Table Recognition and Validation Approach

AAAI Fall Symposium - Technical Report

Volumn FS-99-04, Issue , 1999, Pages 50-57

  Kieninger, Thomas G ^a   Strieder, Bernd ^a  

^a GERMAN RESEARCH CENTER FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DFKI   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS APPROACH; BLOCK SEGMENTATIONS; BLOCK-LAYOUT; CLUSTER OF CELLS; LAYOUT ANALYSIS; PROCESSING STEPS; SEGMENTATION ANALYSIS; VALIDATION APPROACH;

EID: 84951813930     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Chandran, S., and Kasturi, R. 1993. Structural recognition of tabulated data. In Proc. of International Conference on DocumentAnalysis and Recognition - ICDAR 93.
2. Dengel, A. 1994. Aboutthe logical partitioning of document images. In Proceedings SDAIR-9, Int’l Symposium on Document Analysis and Information Retrieval, Las Vegas, NV, 209-218.
3. Green, E., and Krishnamoorthy, M. 1995. Recognition of tables using table grammars. In Proc. of the 3-th Symposiumon DocumentAnalysis and Information Retrieval - SDAIR95,Las Vegas, Nevada.
4. Hirayama, Y. 1995. A method for table structure analysis using dp matching. In Proc. of International Conference on DocumentAnalysis and Recognition - ICDAR95, Montreal, Canada.
5. Hurst, M. 1999. Layout and language: Beyondsimple text for information interaction - modellingthe table. In Proc. of 2nd International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces, HongKong.
6. Itonori, K. 1993. Table structure recognition based on textblock arrangement and ruled line position. In Proc. of International Conference on DocumentAnalysis and Recognition - ICDAR93.
7. Kieninger, T., and Dengel, A. 1998a. A paper-to-html table converting system. In Proc. of Document Analysis Systems - DAS98, Nagano, Japan.
8. Kieninger, T., and Dengel, A. 1998b. Table recognition and labeling using intrinsic layout features. In Proc. of the first International Conferenceon Advances in Pattern Recognition - ICAPR98, Plymouth, UK.
9. Kieninger, T. 1998. Table structure recognition based on robust block segmentation. In Proc. of the fifth SPIEConference on DocumentRecognition, San Jose, California.
10. Levenshtein, V. I. 1965. Binary codes capable of correcting spurious insertions and deletions of ones (original in Russian). Russian ProblemyPeredachi Informatsii 1:12-25.
11. O’Gorman, L. 1992. The document spectrum for bottom-up page layout analysis. In Bunke, H., ed., Advancesin Structural and Syntactic Pattern Recognition. WorldScientific. 270- 279.
12. Rahgozar, M.A.; Fan, Z.; and Rainero, E. V. 1994. Tabular documentrecognition. In Proc. of the SPIE Conference on DocumentRecognition.
13. Rice, S.; Jenkins, F.; and Nartker, T. 1995. The fourth annual test of ocr accuracy. Technical report, Information Science Research Institute (ISRI), Univ. of Nevada, Las Vegas.
14. Rice, S. V.; Jenkins, F. R.; and Nartker, T. A. 1996. Thefifth annual test of ocr accuracy. Technicalreport, Information Science Research Institute (ISRI), Univ. of Nevada, Las Vegas.
15. Rus, D., and Summers, K. 1994. Using white space for automated document structuring. Technical Report TR94 - 1452, Department of ComputerScience, Cornell University.
16. Tupaj, S.; Shi, Z.; and Chang, D. C. H. 1996. Extracting tabular information from text files. Available at http://www.ee.tufts.edu/.-~hchang/paper 1 .ps.