Effect of mercury on the human health and environment: an overview

International Journal of Food Safety, Nutrition and Public Health

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 33-50

  Khatoon Abadi, Ahmad ^a   Sheikh Hoseini, A R ^a   Khalili, B ^a  

^a ISFAHAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

Author keywords

acute exposure; ambient standards; bio accumulation; children; chronic exposure; contamination; fish; heavy metal; humans; mercury; methyl mercury; MS; Multiple Sclerosis; pollutant

Indexed keywords

EID: 84951713509     PISSN: 14793911     EISSN: 1479392X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1504/IJFSNPH.2008.018854     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) (1999) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, (p.1). Available at http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/MHMI/mmg46.html.
2. Al-Shahristani, H. and Shihab, K.M. (1974) ‘Variation of biological half-life of methyl mercury in man’, Archives of Environmental Health, Vol. 28, pp.342–344.
3. Bangsi, D., Ghadirian, P., Ducic, S., Morisset, R., Ciccocioppo, S., McMullen, E. and Krewski, D. (1998) ‘Dental amalgam and multiple sclerosis: a case-control study in Montreal, Canada’, Int. J. Epidemiology, Vol. 27, pp.667–671.
4. Casetta, I., Invernizzi, M. and Granieri, E. (2001) ‘Multiple sclerosis and dental amalgam: casecontrol study in Ferrara, Italy’, Neuroepidemiology, Vol. 20, pp.134–137.
5. Council of the European Union (2005), Council Decision of 20 September 2005, amending Annex II of Directive 2000/53/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on end-of-life vehicles, Official Journal of the European Union, 2005/673/EC.
6. Drasch, G., Aigner, S., Roider, G., Staiger, F. and Lipowsky, G. (1998) ‘Mercury in human colostrum and early breast milk. Its dependence on dental amalgam and other factors’, Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology, Vol. 12, pp.23–27.
7. Drexler, H. and Schaller, K.H. (1998) ‘The mercury concentration in breast milk resulting from amalgam fillings and dietary habits’, Environmental Research, Vol. 77, pp.124–129.
8. European Union. 1992. European CommunityDeskbook. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Law Institute.
9. EPA (1997) Mercury White Paper. Available at http://www.epa.gov/oar/merwhite.html.
10. Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2003) Second National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals, NCEH Pub. No. 02–0716 (Revised March 2003).
11. Essa, A.M.M., Macaskie, L.E. and Brown, N.L. (2002) ‘Mechanisms of mercury bioremediation’, Biochemical Society Transactions, Vol. 30, pp.672–674.
12. Ford, H., Gerry, E., Airey, C., Vail, A., Johnson, M.H. and Williams, D.R. (1998) ‘The prevalence of multiple sclerosis in the leeds health authority’, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, Vol. 64, pp.605–610.
13. FAO (2003) ‘UN Committee recommends new dietary intake limits for mercury’, Available at http://www.fao.org/english/newsroom/news/2003/19783-en.html.
14. Gilkeson, J. (1996) Mercury use: agriculture, draft Wisconsin mercury sourcebook: agriculture. Health and Safety University of California, Office of Environment (2003) Mercury: hazards, precautions, and pollution prevention, environment, health and safety information for the Berkeley campus, (p.1). available at http://www.epa.gov/glnpo/bnsdocs/hgsbook/agr.pdf.
15. Health and Safety University of California, Office of Environment (2003) Mercury: hazards, precautions, and pollution prevention, environment, health and safety information for the Berkeley campus, (p.1). available at www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt/alt_formats/hecs-sesc/pdf/pubs/contaminants/mercury/mercur_e.pdf.
16. Health Canada Mercury Issues Task Group (2004) Mercury: your health and the environment, a resource tool (p.27). available at www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt/alt_formats/hecs-sesc/pdf/pubs/contaminants/mercury/mercur_e.pdf.
17. Hospitals for a Healthy Environment (2005) ‘Making medicine mercury free’, A 2005 Report on the Status of Virtual Mercury Elimination in the Health Care Sector.
18. Kaleri, C.J. (2000) Implementation Issues: Mercury transport and fate combustion risk assessments in region 6. US Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6. Dallas, Texas 75202–2733.
19. Lutter, R. and Irwin, E. (2002) ‘Mercury in the environment: a volatile problem’, Environment, Vol. 44, pp.24–40.
20. McGrother, C.W., Dugmore, C., Phillips, M.J., Raymond, N.T., Garrick, P. and Baird, W.O. (1999) ‘Multiple sclerosis, dental caries and fillings: a case-control study’, British Dental Journal, Vol. 187, pp.261–264.
21. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Progress Report to the Minnesota Legislature (2002) http://www.pca.state.mn.us/hot/legislature/reports/2002/mercury-2.pdf on 15 May 2002.
22. National Conference of State Legislatures (2002) Environmental Health Legislation Database, Available at http://www.ncsl.org/programs/ESNR/cehdb.htm on 23 July 2002.
23. Neuringer, M., Reisbick, S. and Janowsky, J. (1994) ‘The role of omega-3 fatty acids in visual and cognitive development: current evidence and methods of assessment’, Journal of Pediatrics, Vol. 125, pp.S39–S47.
24. New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services (1998) Hazardous substance fact sheet (mercury). Available at www.ccohs.ca/products/databases/njhsfs.html.
25. New Jersey State Department of Health and Senior Services (1996) Guidelines for the safe clean-up of mercury spilled in the home, division of environmental and occupational health (p.1).
26. Odent, M. (2003) ‘Mercury exposure during the primal period, primal, health’, Available at http://www.birthpsychology.com/primalhealth/primal14.html.
27. Ontario Ministry of Environment (1997–1998) Guide to Eating Ontario Sport Fish. 19th rev. ed. Toronto Ministry of the Environment, Communications Branch.
28. Oskarsson, A. and Schultz, A.Skerfving, S., Hallén, I.P., Ohlin, B. and Lagerkvist, B.J. (1996) ‘Total and inorganic mercury in breast milk in relation to fish consumption and amalgam in lactating women’, Archives of Environmental Health, Vol. 51, pp.234–241.
29. Pombo, R.W and Gibbons, J. (2005) ‘Mercury in perspective: Fact and fiction about the debate over mercury’. A Report by Resources Committee Chairman and Energy and Mineral Resources Subcommittee Chairman.
30. Rice, D.C. (1989a) ‘Delayed neurotoxicity in monkeys exposed developmentally to methyl mercury’, Neurotoxicology, Vol. 10, pp.645–650.
31. Rice, D.C. (1989b) ‘Brain and tissue levels of mercury after chronic methyl mercury exposure in the monkey’, Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Vol. 27, pp.189–198.
32. Richards, R., Sampson, F., Beard, S. and Tappenden, P. (2002) ‘A review of the natural history and epidemiology of multiple sclerosis: implications for resource allocation and health economic models’, Health Technology Assessment, Vol. 6, p.18.
33. Robertson, N., Deans, J., Fraser, M. and Compston, D. (1996) ‘Multiple sclerosis in south Cambridgeshire: incidence and prevalence based on a district register’, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, Vol. 50, pp.274–279.
34. Schierow, L.J. (2005) CRS Report for Congress, Mercury in the Environment: Sources and Health Risks.
35. Smith, J., Allen, P., Turner, M., Most, B., Fisher, H.L. and Hall, L.L. (1994) ‘The kinetics of intravenously administered methyl mercury in man’, Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, Vol. 128, pp.251–256.
36. The National Collaborating Centre for Chronic Conditions (2004) Multiple Sclerosis at: National clinical guideline for diagnosis and management in primary and secondary care (pp.3–4).
37. The Canadian Atmospheric Mercury Measurement Network. Available at http://www.msc-smc.ec.gc.ca/arqp/camnete.cfm.
38. The EFSA Journal (2004) Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain on a request from the Commission related to mercury and methylmercury in food Page 5 of 14 34, 1–14. Available at http://www.efsa.eu.int.
39. Toxicology Excellence for Risk Assessment (TERA) (1999) Comparative Dietary Risks: Balancing the Risks and Benefits of Fish Consumption. Results of a Cooperative Agreement between US. Environmental Protection Agency and Toxicology Excellence for Risk Assessment.
40. US Environmental Protection Agency, Great Lakes Program, Virtual Elimination Pilot Project (1994) ‘Mercury sources and regulations’, Appendix C, Available at http://www.epa.gov/grtlakes/bnsdocs/mercsrce/images/9409merc.pdf.
41. USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). 1980. Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Mercury. EPA 40/5–80-058. Washington, D.C.: Office of Water Regulations and Standards.
42. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (1997) ‘Mercury Study Report to Congress’, Volume V: Health Effects of Mercury and Mercury Compounds (pp.4–5).
43. WHO (World Health Organization). 1976. “Mercury.” Environmental Health Criteria 1. Geneva
44. WHO (World Health Organization). 1993. Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality. Vol. 1: Recommendations. 2d ed. Geneva.
45. Williams, L.K. (2006) Health Effects of Methylmercury and North Carolina’s Advice on Eating Fish, North Carolina Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services (p.1).
46. World Bank Group (1998) ‘Pollution Prevention and Abatement Handbook Effective’ July 1998 (p.220).
47. World Health Organization (2005) Mercury in Health Care, Policy paper.