Safety-critical event risk associated with cell phone tasks as measured in naturalistic driving studies: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Accident Analysis and Prevention

Volumn 87, Issue , 2016, Pages 161-169

  Simmons, Sarah M ^a   Hicks, Anne ^b   Caird, Jeff K ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cell or mobile phones; Dialing; Distracted driving; Meta analysis; Naturalistic driving; Research synthesis; Talking; Texting

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CELLULAR TELEPHONE SYSTEMS; CELLULAR TELEPHONES; COMMERCIAL VEHICLES; HAND HELD COMPUTERS; MOBILE PHONES; RISK PERCEPTION; ROADS AND STREETS; SAFETY ENGINEERING; TELECOMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT; TELEPHONE SETS;

DIALING; DISTRACTED DRIVING; META ANALYSIS; NATURALISTIC DRIVING; RESEARCH SYNTHESIS; TALKING; TEXTING;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

CAR DRIVING; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; MOBILE PHONE; PSYCHOLOGY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TEXT MESSAGING; TRAFFIC ACCIDENT;

ACCIDENTS, TRAFFIC; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; CELL PHONES; HUMANS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY; TEXT MESSAGING;

EID: 84951294386     PISSN: 00014575     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.11.015     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. M. Borenstein, L.V. Hedges, J.P.T. Higgins, and H.R. Rothstein Introduction to Meta-analysis 2009 John Wiley and Sons West Sussex, UK
2. J.K. Caird, K.A. Johnston, C.R. Willness, M. Asbridge, and P. Steel A meta-analysis of the effects of texting on driving Accid. Anal. Prev. 71 2014 311 318
3. J.K. Caird, C.R. Willness, P. Steel, and C. Scialfa A meta-analysis of cell phone use on driver performance Accid. Anal. Prev. 40 2008 1282 1293
4. T.A. Dingus Estimates of prevalence and risk associated with inattention and distraction based upon in situ naturalistic data Ann. Adv. Automot. Med. 58 2014 60 68
5. T. Dingus, S.G. Klauer, V.L. Neale, A. Petersen, S.E. Lee, J. Sudweeks, M.A. Perez, J. Hankey, D. Ramsey, S. Gupta, C. Bucher, Z.R. Doerzaph, J. Jermeland, and R. Knipling The 100-car naturalistic driving study, Phase II - results of the 100-car field experiment 2006 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Washington, DC Report No. DOT HS 810 593
6. R. Elvik Effects of mobile phone use on accident risk: problems of meta-analysis when studies are few and bad Transp. Res. Rec. 2236 2011 20 26
7. A.O. Ferdinand, N. Menachemi, J.L. Blackburn, B. Sen, L. Nelson, and M. Morrisey The impact of texting bans on motor vehicle crash-related hospitalizations Am. J. Public Health 105 5 2015 859 865
8. A.O. Ferdinand, N. Menachemi, B. Sen, J.L. Blackburn, and M. Morrisey The impact of texting laws on motor vehicle fatalities Am. J. Public Health 104 8 2014 1370 1377
9. D.L. Fisher, M. Rizzo, J.K. Caird, and J.D. Lee Handbook of Driving Simulation for Engineering, Medicine, and Psychology 2011 CRC Press Boca Raton, FL
10. G.M. Fitch, S.A. Soccolich, F. Guo, and et al. The impact of handheld and hands-free cell phone use on driving performance and safety-critical event risk 2013 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Washington, DC Report No. DOT HS 811 757
11. R. Fu, G. Gartlehner, M. Grant, and et al. Conducting quantitative synthesis when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the effective health care program Methods Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews [Internet] October 25, 2010 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US) Rockville, MD Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK49407 (accessed 14.10.15)
12. Governors Highway Safety Association Distracted Driving Laws June 2015 Available at: http://www.ghsa.org/html/stateinfo/laws/cellphone-laws.html (accessed 16.06.15)
13. F. Guo, S.G. Klauer, M.T. McGill, and T.A. Dingus Evaluating the relationship between near-crashes and crashes: can near-crashes serve as a surrogate safety metric for crashes? 2010 US Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Washington, DC Report No. DOT HS 811 382
14. J.S. Hickman, and R.J. Hanowski An assessment of commercial motor vehicle driver distraction using naturalistic driving data Traffic Inj. Prev. 13 6 2012 612 619
15. Chapter 7.7.7.3: Obtaining standard errors from confidence intervals and P values: ratio measures J.P.T. Higgins, and S. Green Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5. 1. 0 [updated March 2011] 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org (accessed 12.12.14)
16. J.K. Jonasson, and H. Rootzén Internal validation of near-crashes in naturalistic driving studies: a continuous and multivariate approach Accid. Anal. Prev. 62 2014 102 109
17. S.G. Klauer, D.R. Dingus, T.A. Neale, J. Sudweeks, and D.J. Ramsey The impact of driver inattention on near-crash/crash risk: an analysis using the 100-car naturalistic study data 2006 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Washington, DC Report No. DOT HS 810 594
18. S.G. Klauer, F. Guo, B.G. Simons-Morton, M.C. Ouimet, S.E. Lee, and T.A. Dingus Distracted driving and risk of road crashes among novice and experienced drivers N. Engl. J. Med. 370 2014 54 59
19. R.R. Knipling Naturalistic driving events: no harm, no foul, no validity Paper presented at: 8th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design Salt Lake City, UT, June 22-25 2015
20. A.T. McCartt, D.G. Kidd, and E.R. Teoh Driver cellphone and texting bans in the United States: evidence of effectiveness Ann. Adv. Automot. Med. 58 2014 99 114
21. S.P. McEvoy, M.R. Stevenson, A.T. McCartt, M. Woodward, C. Haworth, P. Palamara, and R. Cercarelli Role of mobile phones in motor vehicle crashes resulting in hospital attendance: a case-crossover study BMJ 331 2005 428 430
22. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) Traffic safety facts: distracted driving 2013 2015 NHTSA Washington, DC Report No. DOT-HS-812-132
23. R. Olson, R. Hanowski, J. Hickman, and J. Bocanegra Driver distraction in commercial vehicle operations 2009 Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Washington, DC Report No. FMCSA-RRR-09-042
24. D.A. Redelmeier, and R.J. Tibshirani Association between cellular telephone calls and motor vehicle collisions N. Engl. J. Med. 336 1997 453 458
25. S.A. Soccolich, G.M. Fitch, M.A. Perez, and R.J. Hanowski Comparing handheld and hands-free cell phone usage behaviors while driving Traffic Inj. Prev. 15 2014 S21 S26
26. D.F. Stroup, J.A. Berlin, S.C. Morton, I. Olkin, G.D. Williamson, D. Rennie, D. Moher, B.J. Becker, T.A. Sipe, and S.B. Thacker Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting JAMA 283 2000 2008 2012
27. Transportation Research Board (TRB) Frequently Asked Questions About the SHRP 2 Naturalistic Driving Study 2013 Available at: http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/shrp2/safety-all.pdf (accessed 07.07.15)
28. T. Victor, J. Argman, C.-N. Boda, M. Dozza, J. Engstrom, C. Flanagan, J.D. Lee, and G. Markkula Analysis of Naturalistic Driving Study Data: Safer Glances, Driver Inattention, and Crash Risk (SHRP 2 Safety Project S08A) 2014 Transportation Research Board Washington, DC
29. E. von Elm, D.G. Altman, M. Egger, S.J. Popcock, P.C. Gotzsche, J.P. Vandenbrouke STROBE Initiative The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies J. Clin. Epidemiol. 61 4 2008 344 349
30. F.A. Wilson, and J.P. Stimpson Trends in driver fatalities from distracted driving in the United States, 1999 to 2008 Am. J. Public Health 100 2010 2213 2219
31. World Health Organization (WHO) Mobile Phone Use: A Growing Problem of Driver Distraction 2011 World Health Organization Geneva, Switzerland
32. World Health Organization (WHO) Global Status Report on Road Safety 2013 2015 World Health Organization Geneva, Switzerland