Schools information technology (IT) 2000: Technological innovation and educational change

Irish Educational Studies

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 227-244

  Conway, Paul ^a  

^a CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84951273680     PISSN: 03323315     EISSN: 17474965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0332331000190119     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Apple, M., and Junck, S., 1990. You don't have to be a teacher to teach this unit: Teaching, technology and gender in the classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 27 (2): 227–251.
2. Apple, M., 1991. Computers in the schools: Salvation or social disaster. Computers in the Schools, 8: 59–81.
3. Bereiter, C., and Scardamalia, M., 1987. The psychology of written composition, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4. Borko, H., and Putnam, R.T., 1996. “ Learning to teach ”. In Handbook of Educational Psychology, Edited by: Berliner, D., and Calfee, R., 673–706. New York: Simon Schuster Macmillan.
5. Bromley, H., 1997. “ Thinking about computers and schools: A sceptical view ”. In Re‐inventing technology, rediscovering community: Critical explorations of computing as a social practice, Edited by: Agre, P.E., and Schuler, D., 107–126. Greenwich, CN: Ablex Publishing Corp.
6. Bruce, B. C., 1993. “ Innovation and social change ”. In Network‐based classrooms: Promises and realities, Edited by: Bertram, B.C., Peyton, J., and Batson, T., 33–49. New York: Cambridge University Press.
7. Burbules, N., 1998. “ Rhetorics of the Web: Hyperreading and critical literacy ”. In Page to screen: Taking literacy into the electronic era, Edited by: Snyder, I., 102–122. London: Routledge.
8. Calkins, L., 1986. The art of teaching writing, Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
9. Clark, C.M., and Peterson, P.L., 1986. “ Teachers thought processes ”. In Handbook of research on teaching, (3rd. edition), Edited by: Wittrock, M.C., 255–296. New York: Macmillan.
10. Cohen, D. K., 1989. “ Teaching practice: Plus ça change.. ”. In Contributing to educational change: perspectives on research on practice, Edited by: Jackson, P.W., 27–84. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
11. Cuban, L., 1986. Teachers and machines: The classroom uses of technology since 1920, New York: Teachers College Press.
12. Department of Education. 1995. Schools IT 2000, Dublin: Author. http://www.irlgov.ie/ [last modified 4/11/1999]
13. European Commission. 1994. Europe and the Global Information Society: Recommendations to the European Council, Bangemann Report Brusselles: Author. http://www.ispo.cec.be/infosoc/backg/bangeman.html
14. European Commission. 1995. Teaching and learning: Towards a learning society: White Paper on Education and Training, Brusselles: Author. http://europa.eu.int/en/record/white/edu9511/index.htm;
15. Fägerlind, I., and Sana, L.J., 1989. Education and national development: A comparative perspective, Oxford: Pergamon Press.
16. Floden, R.E., and Clark, C.M., 1988. Preparing teachers for uncertainty. Teachers College Record, 89 (4): 505–24.
17. Forbairt. 1996. Ireland: The digital age, the Internet, Dublin: Author. http://www.nsd.ie/inflitdi.html
18. Fullan, M., 1993. The new meaning of educational change, New York: Teachers College Press.
19. Government of Ireland. 1995. Charting Our Education Future: White Paper on Education, Dublin: Author.
20. IBEC. 1996. Social policy in a competitive society, Dublin: Irish Business and Employers Confederation.
21. INTO. 1996. Information Technology in Irish Primary Education: Issues and recommendations, Dublin: Author.
22. INTO. 26–28 February 1998. The results of DigiVote at the Educational Technology Conference, 26–28 February, Dublin: Author.
23. ISI. 1997. Information Society Ireland Strategy for Action, Dublin: Author.
24. Joyce, M., 1998. “ New stories for new readers: Contour, coherence, and constructive hypertext ”. In Page to screen: Taking literacy into the electronic era, Edited by: Snyder, I., 163–182. London: Routledge.
25. Kavanagh, J., 1995. “ A survey of writing instruction in Dublin primary schools ”. In Reading development to age 15: Overcoming difficulties, Edited by: Shiel, G., Ní Dhálaigh, U., and O'Reilly, B., 73–85. Dublin: Reading Association of Ireland.
26. Lewis, M., and Kellaghan, T., 1993. Exploring the gender gap in primary schools: Gender Equity Action Research Project, Dublin: Educational Research Centre.
27. Macpherson, R.J.S., Cibulka, J.G., Monk, D.H., and Wong, K.K., 1998. The politics of accountability: Educative and international perspectives (Special Issue). Educational Policy, 12 (2): 15–45.
28. Martin, M.O., and Morgan, M., 1994. Reading literacy in Irish schools: A comparative analysis, (Special Issue). Irish Journal of Education, 28
29. Morine‐Dershimer, G., and Corrigan, S., 1997. “ Teacher beliefs ”. In Psychology and Educational Practice, Edited by: Walberg, H.J., and Haertel, G.D., 297–319. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan Publishing Company.
30. Mulcahy, J., 1997. “ Information technology in the Junior Cycle curriculum ”. In Issues in Education, Edited by: Hyland, A., Vol. 2, 143–154. Dublin: Association of Secondary Teachers of Ireland.
31. NITEC/DCU. 1992. New Information Technologies in the Irish School System, Dublin: Author.
32. Noble, D.D., 1996. Mad rushes into the future: The overselling of educational technology. Educational Leadership, 54 (3): 18–23.
33. OECD. 1989. Education and economy in a changing society, Paris: Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development.
34. OECD. 1991. Reviews of national policies for education, Paris: OECD.
35. Reinking, D., McKenna, M., Labbo, L.D., and Kieffer, R.D., eds. 1998. A handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post‐typographic world, Mahweh, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Robins, K., and Webster, F., 1989. The technical fix: Education, computers and Industry, New York: St. Martin's Press.
37. Salomon, G., and Almog. 1998. What can educational psychology contribute to technology?. Teachers College Record, 100 (2): 222–241.
38. Sarason, S. B., 1993. Revisiting ‘The culture of the school and the problem of change’, New York: Teachers College Press.
39. Schwille, J., Porter, A., Flolden, R., Freeman, D., Kanppen, L., Kuhs, T., and Schmidt, W., 1983. “ Teachers as policy brokers in the content of elementary school mathematics ”. In Handbook of teaching and policy, Edited by: Shulman, L., and Sykes, G., 370–391. New York: Longman.
40. Shiel, G., Forde, P., and Morgan, M., 1996. International studies of educational achievement: What do they tell us?. Oideas, 44: 80–97.
41. Snyder, I., ed. 1998. Page to screen: Taking literacy into the electronic era, London: Routledge.
42. Staudenmaier, S. J., 1985. Technology's storytellers: Reweaving the human fabric, Cambridge: The Society for the History of Technology and the MIT Press.
43. Sutton, R., 1991. Equity and computers in the schools: A decade of research. Review of Research in Education, 61 (4): 475–503.
44. U.S. Department of Education. 1996. Getting America's students ready for the 21st century: Meeting the technology literacy challenge, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
45. World Bank. 1990. Primary education: A World Bank policy paper, Washington, DC: Author.
46. Zhao, Y., and Conway, P.F., “What is for sale today?”: An analysis of technology, student, teacher, and educational images in state technology plans. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association (AERA) annual meeting. Montreal, Canada.