More than a list: What outdoor free listings of landscape categories reveal about commonsense geographic concepts and memory search strategies

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 9368, Issue , 2015, Pages 224-243

  Wartmann, Flurina M ^a   Egorova, Ekaterina ^a   Derungs, Curdin ^a   Mark, David M ^b   Purves, Ross S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

Commonsense geography; Free lists; Geographic categories; GIS; Landscape categorizations; Memory search

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATION THEORY; INFORMATION THEORY; SEMANTICS;

COMMONSENSE GEOGRAPHY; FREE LISTS; GEOGRAPHIC CATEGORIES; LANDSCAPE CATEGORIZATIONS; MEMORY SEARCHES;

GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 84951263112     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-23374-1_11     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (58)

1. Rosch, E.: Principles of categorization. In: Rosch, E., Lloyd, B. (eds.) Cognition and Categorization. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1978)
2. Schuurman, N.: Formalization matters: critical GIS and ontology research. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 96(4), 726–739 (2006)
3. Gahegan, M., Takatsuka, M., Dai, X.: An exploration into the definition, operationalization and evaluation of geographical categories. In: Pullar, D.V. (ed.) GeoComputation 2001. Brisbane, Australia (2001)
4. Fonseca, F.T., Egenhofer, M.J., Davis, C.A., Borges, K.A.V.: Ontologies and knowledge sharing in urban GIS. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 24(3), 251–272 (2000)
5. Tversky, B., Hemenway, K.: Categories of environmental scenes. Cogn. Psychol. 15(1), 121–149 (1983)
6. Klippel, A., Weaver, C., Robinson, A.C.: Analyzing cognitive conceptualizations using interactive visual environments. Cartography Geogr. Inf. Sci. 38(1), 52–68 (2011)
7. Mark, D.M., Turk, A.G.: Landscape categories in yindjibarndi: ontology, environment, and language. In: Kuhn, W., Worboys, M.F., Timpf, S. (eds.) COSIT 2003. LNCS, vol. 2825, pp. 28–45. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
8. Mark, D., Klippel, A., Wallgrün, J.O.: A crowd-sourced taxonomy for the common-sense geographic domain. In: Stewart, K., Pebesma, E., Navratil, G., Fogliaroni, P., Duckham, M. (eds.) Extended Abstract Proceedings of the GIScience 2014, pp. 358–361. Vienna University of Technology, Vienna (2014)
9. Edwardes, A.J., Purves, R.S.: A theoretical grounding for semantic descriptions of Place. In: Ware, J., Taylor, G.E. (eds.) W2GIS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4857, pp. 106–120. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
10. Rorissa, A.: User-generated descriptions of individual images versus labels of groups of images: a comparison using basic level theory. Inf. Process. Manage. 44(5), 1741–1753 (2008)
11. Burenhult, N., Levinson, S.C.: Language and landscape: a cross-linguistic perspective. Lang. Sci. 30(2–3), 135–150 (2008)
12. Mark, D.M., Turk, A.G., Burenhult, N., Stea, D. (eds.): Landscape in Language. Transdisciplinary Perspectives. John Benjamins, Amsterdam (2011)
13. Smith, B., Mark, D.M.: Geographical categories: an ontological investigation. Int. J. Geog. Inf. Sci. 15(7), 591–612 (2001)
14. Robbins, P.: Fixed categories in a portable landscape: the causes and consequences of landcover categorization. Environ. Plann. A 33(1), 161–179 (2001)
15. de Groot, R., Alkemade, R., Braat, L., Hein, L., Willemen, L.: Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning. Manage. Decis. Making. Ecol. Complex. 7(3), 260–272 (2010)
16. Johnson, L.M.: Introduction. In: Johnson, L.M., Hunn, E.S. (eds.) Landscape Ethnoecology: Concepts of Biotic and Physical Space, pp. 1–15. Berghahn Books, New York (2010)
17. Berlin, B.: Ethnobiological Classification: Principles of Categorization of Plants and Animals in Traditional Societies. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1992)
18. Berlin, B., Kay, P.: Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution. University of California Press, Berkley (1969)
19. Hunn, E.S.: Toward a Perceptual Model of Folk Biological Classification. Am. Ethnologist 3(3), 508–524 (1976)
20. Taylor, J.R.: Linguistic Categorization. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2003)
21. Rosch, E., Lloyd, B. (eds.): Cognition and Categorization. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1978)
22. Lakoff, G.: Women, fire, and dangerous things. What Categories Reveal about the Mind. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1987)
23. Mark, D.M., Smith, B., Tversky, B.: Ontology and geographic objects: an empirical study of cognitive categorization. In: Freksa, C., Mark, D.M. (eds.) COSIT 1999. LNCS, vol. 1661, pp. 283–298. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)
24. Shatford, S.: Analyzing the subject of a picture: a theoretical approach. Cataloging Classif. Q. 6(3), 39–62 (1986)
25. Hough, G., Ferraris, D.: Free listing: a method to gain initial insight of a food category. Food Qual. Prefer. 21(3), 295–301 (2010)
26. Battig, W.F., Montague, W.E.: Category norms of verbal items in 56 categories. a replication and extension of the connecticut category norms. J. Exp. Psychol. 80(3), 1–46 (1969)
27. van Overschelde, J.P., Rawson, K.A., Dunlosky, J.: Category norms: an updated and expanded version of the norms. J. Mem. Lang. 50(3), 289–335 (2004)
28. Lloyd, R., Patton, D., Cammack, R.: Basic-level geographic categories. Prof. Geogr. 48(2), 181–194 (1996)
29. Smith, B.: Mereotopology: a theory of parts and boundaries. Data Knowl. Eng. 20(3), 287–303 (1996)
30. Smith, B., Mark, D.M.: Do mountains exist? towards an ontology of landforms. Environ. Plann. B 30(3), 411–427 (2003)
31. Pires, P.: Geospatial conceptualisation: a cross-cultural analysis on portuguese and American geographical categorisations. In: Spaccapietra, S., Zimányi, E. (eds.) Journal on Data Semantics III. LNCS, vol. 3534, pp. 196–212. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
32. Giannakopoulou, L., Kavouras, M., Kokla, M., Mark, D.: From compasses and maps to mountains and territories: experimental results on geographic cognitive categorization. In: Raubal, M.M., Mark, D.M., Frank, A.U. (eds.) Cognitive and Linguistic Aspects of Geographic Space. LNGC, pp. 63–81. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
33. Williams, M., Kuhn, W., Painho, M.: The influence of landscape variation on landform categorization. JOSIS 5, 51–73 (2012)
34. Brewer, D.D.: Patterns in the recall of persons in a student community. Soc. Netw. 15(4), 335–359 (1993)
35. Troyer, A.K., Moscovitch, M., Winocur, G.: Clustering and switching as two components of verbal fluency: evidence from younger and older healthy adults. Neuropsychology 11(1), 138–146 (1997)
36. Collins, A.M., Quillian, M.R.: Retrieval time from semantic memory. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 8(2), 240–247 (1969)
37. Gruenewald, P.J., Lockhead, G.R.: The free recall of category examples. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Learn. Mem. 6(3), 225 (1980)
38. Bousfield, W.A., Sedgewick, C.H.W.: An analysis of sequences of restricted associative responses. J. Gen. Psychol. 30(2), 149–165 (1944)
39. Hills, T.T., Jones, M.N., Todd, P.M.: Optimal foraging in semantic memory. Psychol. Rev. 119(2), 431–440 (2012)
40. Charnov, E.L.: Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. Theor. Popul. Biol. 9(2), 129–136 (1976)
41. Troyer, A.K., Moscovitch, M., Winocur, G., Alexander, M.P., Stuss, D.: Clustering and switching on verbal fluency: the effects of focal frontal- and temporal-lobe lesions. Neuropsychologia 36(6), 499–504 (1998)
42. Monsch, A.U., Bondi, M.W., Butters, N., Salmon, D.P., Katzman, R., Thal, L.J.: Comparisons of verbal fluency tasks in the detection of dementia of the alzheimer type. Arch. Neurol. 49(12), 1253–1258 (1992)
43. Reverberi, C., Laiacona, M., Capitani, E.: Qualitative features of semantic fluency performance in mesial and lateral frontal patients. Neuropsychologia 44(3), 469–478 (2006)
44. Body, R., Muskett, T.: Pandas and Penguins, Monkeys and caterpillars: problems of cluster analysis in semantic verbal fluency. Qual. Res. Psychol. 10(1), 28–41 (2013)
45. Davies, I., Corbett, G.: The basic color terms of Russian. Linguistics 32(1), 65–90 (1994)
46. Bousfield, W.A., Barclay, W.D.: The relationship between order and frequency of occurrence of restricted associative responses. J. Exp. Psychol. 40(5), 643–647 (1950)
47. Sutrop, U.: List task and a cognitive salience index. Field Methods 13(3), 263–276 (2001)
48. R Development Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna (2008)
49. Freeman, L.C.: A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry 40(1), 35–41 (1977)
50. Fruchterman, T.M.J., Reingold, E.M.: Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Softw.: Pract. Exp. 21(11), 1129–1164 (1991)
51. Wood, J., Dykes, J., Slingsby, A., Clarke, K.: Interactive visual exploration of a large spatiotemporal dataset: Reflections on a geovisualization mashup. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 13(6), 1176–1183 (2007)
52. Troyer, A.K.: Normative data for clustering and switching on verbal fluency tasks. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 22(3), 370–378 (2010)
53. Turk, A.G., Mark, D.M., Stea, D.: Ethnophysiography. In: Mark, D.M., Turk, A.G., Burenhult, N., Stea, D. (eds.) Landscape in Language: Transdisciplinary Perspectives, pp. 25–45. John Benjamins Publishing, Amsterdam (2011)
54. Williams, M.C.: Contribution towards Understanding the Categorisation of Landforms. MSc Thesis Instituto Superior de Estatística e Gestão de Informação ISEGI, Universidade Nova, Lissabon (2011)
55. Fisher, P., Wood, J., Cheng, T.: Where is helvellyn? fuzziness of multi-scale landscape morphometry. Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr. 29(1), 106–128 (2004)
56. Levinson, S.C.: Foreword. In: Mark, D.M., Turk, A.G., Burenhult, N., Stea, D. (eds.) Landscape in Language: Transdisciplinary Perspectives, pp. 9–10. John Benjamins Publishing, Amsterdam (2011)
57. Kiefer, P., Giannopoulos, I., Kremer, D., Schlieder, C., Raubal, M.: An outdoor eye tracking study of tourists exploring a city Panorama. In: Qvarfordt, P., Witzner Hansen, D. (eds.) Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications - ETRA 2014, pp. 315–318. ACM, New York (2014)
58. Henderson, J.M.: Human gaze control during real-world scene perception. Trends Cogn. Sci. 7(11), 498–504 (2003)