Which metrics should be used in non-linear registration evaluation?

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 9350, Issue , 2015, Pages 388-395

  Ribeiro, Andre Santos ^a   Nutt, David J ^a   McGonigle, John ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BINS; DEFORMATION; MEDICAL COMPUTING; NEUROIMAGING;

DEFORMATION FIELD; NON LINEAR; NON-BINARY; REGISTRATION METHODS; STATE OF THE ART; SURFACE-BASED; VOLUMES OF INTERESTS;

MEDICAL IMAGING;

EID: 84951019234     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-24571-3_47     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Babalola, K., Patenaude, B., Aljabar, P., Schnabel, J., Kennedy, D., Crum, W., Smith, S., Cootes, T., Jenkinson, M., Rueckert, D.: An evaluation of four automatic methods of segmenting the subcortical structures in the brain. NeuroImage 47, 1435–1447 (2009)
2. Camara, O., Scahill, R., Schnabel, J., Crum, W., Ridgway, G., Hill, D., Fox, N.: Accuracy assessment of global and local atrophy measurement techniques with realistic simulated longitudinal data. Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Interv. 10(2), 785–792 (2007)
3. Camara, O., Schweiger, M., Scahill, R., Crum, W., Sneller, B., Schnabel, J., Ridgway, G., Cash, D., Hill, D., Fox, N.: Phenomenological model of diffuse global and regional atrophy using finite-element methods. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 25(11), 1417–1430 (2006)
4. Hellier, P., Barillot, C., Corouge, I., Gibaud, B., Le Goualher, G., Collins, D., Evans, A., Malandain, G., Ayache, N., Johnson, H.: Retrospective evaluation of intersubject brain registration. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 22, 1120–1130 (2003)
5. Hyder, A.K., Shahbazian, E., Waltz, E. (eds.): Multisensor Fusion. Springer Science & Business Media (2002)
6. Karaali, B., Davatzikos, C.: Simulation of tissue atrophy using a topology preserving transformation model. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 25(5), 649–652 (2006)
7. Klein, A., Andersson, J., Ardekani, B., Ashburner, J., Avants, B., Chiang, M., Christensen, G., Louis Collinsi, D., Geef, J., Parsey, R.: Evaluation of 14 nonlinear deformation algorithms applied to human brain MRI registration. NeuroImage 46, 786–802 (2009)
8. Murphy, K., van Ginneken, B., Klein, S., Staring, M., de Hoop, B.J., Viergever, M.A., Pluim, J.P.W.: Semi-automatic construction of reference standards for evaluation of image registration. Medical Image Analysis 15(1), 71–84 (2011)
9. Murphy, K., Ginneken, B., Reinhardt, J., Kabus, S., Ding, K., Deng, X., Cao, K., Du, K., Christensen, G., Pluim, J.: Evaluation of Registration Methods on Thoracic CT: The EMPIRE10 Challenge. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 30(11), 1901–1920 (2011)
10. Ou, Y., Akbari, H., Bilello, M., Da, X., Davatzikos, C.: Comparative evaluation of registration algorithms in different brain databases with varying difficulty: results and insights. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 33(10), 2039–2065 (2014)
11. Pieperhoff, P., Sdmeyer, M., Hmke, L., Zilles, K., Schnitzler, A., Amunts, K.: Detection of structural changes of the human brain in longitudinally acquired MR images by deformation field morphometry: methodological analysis, validation and application. NeuroImage 43(2), 269–287 (2008)
12. Rohlfing, T.: Image similarity and tissue overlaps as surrogates for image registration accuracy: widely used but unreliable. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 31(2), 153–163 (2012)
13. Schnabel, J., Tanner, C., Castellano-Smith, A., Degenhard, A., Leach, M., Hose, D., Hill, D., Hawkes, D.: Validation of nonrigid image registration using finite-element methods: application to breast MR images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 22(2), 238–247 (2003)
14. Wu, G., Kim, M., Wang, Q., Shen, D.: S-HAMMER: hierarchical attributeguided, symmetric diffeomorphic registration for MR brain images. Hum. Brain Mapp. 35(3), 1044–1060 (2014)
15. Yassa, M.A., Stark, C.E.L.: A quantitative evaluation of cross-participant registration techniques for MRI studies of the medial temporal lobe. NeuroImage 44, 319–327 (2009)