A survey on representation-based classification and detection in hyperspectral remote sensing imagery

Pattern Recognition Letters

Volumn 83, Issue , 2016, Pages 115-123

  Li, Wei ^a   Du, Qian ^b  

^a BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Anomaly detection; Collaborative representation; Hyperspectral imagery; Pattern classification; Sparse representation; Target detection

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); PATTERN RECOGNITION; RADAR TARGET RECOGNITION; SIGNAL DETECTION; SPACE OPTICS; SPECTROSCOPY; TARGET TRACKING;

ANOMALY DETECTION; COLLABORATIVE REPRESENTATIONS; HYPER-SPECTRAL IMAGERIES; HYPERSPECTRAL REMOTE SENSING; MEASURING SIMILARITIES; RECOVERY OPTIMIZATIONS; SPARSE REPRESENTATION; SPARSE REPRESENTATION BASED CLASSIFICATIONS;

REMOTE SENSING;

EID: 84951009176     PISSN: 01678655     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2015.09.010     Document Type: Article

References (102)

1. [1] Donoho, D.L., Compressed sensing. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 52:4 (2006), 1289–1306.
2. [2] Baraniuk, R.G., Compressive sensing. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 24:4 (2007), 118–121.
3. [3] Baraniuk, R.G., Candès, E., Nowak, R., Vetterli, M., Compressive sampling. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 25:2 (2008), 12–13.
4. [4] Candès, E.J., Wakin, M.B., An introduction to compressive sampling. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 25:2 (2008), 21–30.
5. [5] Wright, J., Yang, A.Y., Ganesh, A., Sastry, S.S., Ma, Y., Robust face recognition via sparse representation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 31:2 (2009), 210–227.
6. [6] Sami ul Haq, Q., Tao, L., Sun, F., Yang, S., A fast and robust sparse approach for hyperspectral data classification using a few labeled samples. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 50:6 (2012), 2287–2302.
7. [7] Shrivastava, A., Patel, V.M., Chellappa, R., Multiple kernel learning for sparse representation-based classification. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 23:7 (2014), 3013–3024.
8. [8] Wang, J., Lu, C., Wang, M., Li, P., Yan, S., Hu, X., Robust face recognition via adaptive sparse representation. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 44:12 (2014), 2368–2378.
9. [9] Zhang, H., Nasrabadi, N.M., Zhang, Y., Huang, T.S., Joint dynamic sparse representation for multiview face recognition. Pattern Recogn. 45:4 (2012), 1290–1298.
10. [10] Li, J., Lu, C., A new decision rule for sparse representation based classification for face recognition. Neurocomputing 116 (2013), 265–271.
11. [11] Zhang, H., Zhang, Y., Huang, T.S., Pose-robust face recognition via sparse representation. Pattern Recogn. 46:5 (2013), 1511–1521.
12. [12] Deng, W., Hu, J., Guo, J., Extended SRC: undersampled face recognition via intraclass variant dictionary. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 34:9 (2012), 1864–1870.
13. [13] Guha, T., Ward, R.K., Learning sparse representations for human action recognition. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 34:8 (2012), 1576–1588.
14. [14] Zhang, X., Yang, Y., Jiao, L., Dong, F., Manifold-constrained coding and sparse representation for human action recognition. Pattern Recogn. 46:7 (2013), 1819–1831.
15. [15] Lu, Z., Peng, Y., Latent semantic learning with structured sparse representation for human action recognition. Pattern Recogn. 46:7 (2013), 1799–1809.
16. [16] Zhou, Y., Liu, K., Carrillo, R.E., Barner, K.E., Kiamilev, F., Kernel-based sparse representation for gesture recognition. Pattern Recogn. 46:12 (2013), 3208–3222.
17. [17] Lai, Z., Wong, W.K., Xu, Y., Zhao, C., Sun, M., Sparse alignment for robust tensor learning. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 25:10 (2014), 1779–1792.
18. [18] Castrodad, A., Xing, Z., Greer, J.B., Bosch, E., Carin, L., Sapiro, G., Learning discriminative sparse representations for modeling, source separation, and mapping of hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 49:11 (2011), 4263–4281.
19. [19] Wu, Z., Wang, Q., Plaza, A., Li, J., Wei, Z., Parallel implementation of sparse representation classifiers for hyperspectral imagery on GPUs. IEEE J. Select. Top. Appl. Earth Observ. Remote Sens. 8:6 (2015), 2912–2925.
20. [20] Wu, Z., Wang, Q., Plaza, A., Li, J., Sun, L., Wei, Z., Parallel spatial-spectral hyperspectral image classification with sparse representation and Markov random fields on GPUs. IEEE J. Select. Top. Appl. Earth Observ. Remote Sens. 8:6 (2015), 2926–2938.
21. [21] Yuan, H., Tang, Y.Y., Sparse representation based on set-to-set distance for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE J. Select. Top. Appl. Earth Observ. Remote Sens. 8:6 (2015), 2464–2472.
22. [22] Zhao, X., He, Z., Zhang, S., Liang, D., Robust pedestrian detection in thermal infrared imagery using a shape distribution histogram feature and modified sparse representation classification. Pattern Recogn. 48:6 (2015), 1947–1960.
23. [23] Dong, G., Kunag, G., Wang, N., Zhao, L., Lu, J., SAR target recognition via joint sparse representation of monogenic signal. IEEE J. Select. Top. Appl. Earth Observ. Remote Sens. 8:7 (2015), 3316–3328.
24. [24] Wang, L., Zhao, L., Bi, G., Wan, C., Sparse representation-based ISAR imaging using Markov random fields. IEEE J. Select. Top. Appl. Earth Observ. Remote Sens. 8:8 (2015), 3941–3953.
25. [25] Zhang, L., Sun, L., Zou, B., Moon, W., Fully polarimetric SAR image classification via sparse representation and polarimetric features. IEEE J. Select. Top. Appl. Earth Observ. Remote Sens. 8:8 (2015), 3923–3932.
26. [26] Shen, F., Zhao, G., Liu, Z., Shi, G., Lin, J., SAR imaging with structure sparse representation. IEEE J. Select. Top. Appl. Earth Observ. Remote Sens. 8:8 (2015), 3902–3910.
27. [27] Du, X., Duan, C., Hu, W., Sparse representation based autofocusing techniques for ISAR images. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 51:3 (2013), 1826–1835.
28. [28] Shao, W., Bouzerdoum, A., Phung, S.L., Sparse representation of GPR traces with application to signal classification. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 51:7 (2013), 3922–3930.
29. [29] Li, S., Yin, H., Fang, L., Remote sensing image fusion via sparse representation over learned dictionaries. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 51:9 (2013), 4779–4789.
30. [30] Sun, X., Nasrabadi, N.M., Tran, T.D., Task-driven dictionary learning for hyperspectral image classification with structured sparsity constraints. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 53:8 (2015), 4457–4471.
31. [31] Chen, S.S., Donoho, D.L., Saunders, M.A., Atomic decomposition by basis pursuit. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 20:1 (1998), 33–61.
32. [32] Gill, P.R., Wang, A., Molnar, A., The incrowd algorithm for fast basis pursuit denoising. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 59:10 (2011), 4595–4605.
33. [33] Tropp, J., Gilbert, A., Signal recovery from random measurements via orthogonal matching pursuit. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 53:12 (2007), 4655–4666.
34. [34] Dai, W., Milenkovic, O., Subspace pursuit for compressive sensing signal reconstruction. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 55:5 (2009), 2230–2249.
35. [35] Zhang, L., Yang, M., Feng, X., Sparse representation or collaborative representation: which helps face recognition?. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision, 2011, 471–478 Barcelona, Spain.
36. 1-optimizer in pattern classification. Pattern Recogn. 45:3 (2012), 1104–1118.
37. 2-minimization approach. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 34 (2013), 201–208.
38. [38] Chen, J., Jiao, L., Hyperspectral imagery classification using local collaborative representation. Int. J. Remote Sens. 36:3 (2015), 734–748.
39. [39] Landgrebe, D.A., Hyperspectral image data analysis. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 19:1 (2002), 17–28.
40. [40] Nasrabadi, N.M., Hyperspectral target detection: an overview of current and future challenges. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 31:1 (2014), 34–44.
41. [41] Li, W., Du, Q., Gabor-filtering based nearest regularized subspace for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE J. Select. Top. Appl. Earth Observ. Remote Sens. 7:4 (2014), 1012–1022.
42. [42] Cui, M., Prasad, S., Class-depdendent sparse representation classifier for robust hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 53:5 (2015), 2683–2695.
43. [43] Zhang, L., Zhou, W., Liu, B., Nonlinear nearest subspace classifier. Proceedings of the 18th Internation Conference on Neural Information Processing, 2011, 638–645 Shanghai, China.
44. [44] Weinberger, K.Q., Saul, L.K., Distance metric learning for large margin nearest neighbor classification. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 10 (2009), 207–244.
45. [45] Lu, C., Min, H., Gui, J., Zhu, L., Lei, Y., Face recognition via weighted sparse representation. J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent. 24 (2013), 111–116.
46. [46] Li, W., Du, Q., Adaptive sparse representation for hyperspectral image classification. Proceedings of the International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2015 Milan, Italy.
47. [47] Li, W., Tramel, E.W., Prasad, S., Fowler, J.E., Nearest regularized subspace for hyperspectral classification. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 52:1 (2014), 477–489.
48. [48] Yuan, H., Yang, Y., Lu, Y., Yang, L., Lou, H., Hyperspectral image classification based on regularized sparse representation. IEEE J. Select. Top. Appl. Earth Observ. Remote Sens. 7:6 (2015), 2174–2182.
49. 1/2 regularized low-rank representation and sparse representation-based graph cuts. IEEE J. Select. Top. Appl. Earth Observ. Remote Sens. 8:6 (2015), 2473–2484.
50. [50] Chen, Y., Nasrabadi, N.M., Tran, T.D., Hyperspectral image classification using dictionary-based sparse representation. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 49:10 (2011), 3973–3985.
51. [51] Li, W., Du, Q., Joint within-class collaborative representation for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE J. Select. Top. Appl. Earth Observ. Remote Sens. 7:6 (2014), 2200–2208.
52. [52] Hui, K., Li, C., Zhang, L., Sparse neighbor representation for classification. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 33 (2012), 661–669.
53. [53] Li, J., Zhang, H., Huang, Y., Zhang, L., Hyperspectral image classification by nonlocal joint collaborative representation with a locally adaptive dictionary. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 52:6 (2014), 3707–3719.
54. [54] Zhang, H., Li, J., Huang, Y., Zhang, L., A nonlocal weighted joint sparse representation classification method for hyperspectral imagery. IEEE J. Select. Top. Appl. Earth Observ. Remote Sens. 7:6 (2014), 2056–2065.
55. [55] Xiong, M., Ran, Q., Li, W., Zou, J., Du, Q., Hyperspectral image classifcation using weighted joint collaborative representation. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 12:1 (2015), 48–52.
56. [56] Tang, X., Feng, G., Cai, J., Weighted group sparse representation for undersampled face recognition. Neurocomputing 145 (2014), 402–415.
57. [57] Fan, Z., Ni, M., Zhu, Q., Liu, E., Weighted sparse representation for face recognition. Neurocomputing 151 (2015), 304–309.
58. [58] Timofte, R., Gool, L.V., Adaptive and weighted collaborative representations for image classification. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 43 (2014), 127–135.
59. [59] Peng, X., Zhang, L., Yi, Z., Tan, K.K., Learning locality-constrained collaborative representation for robust face recognition. Pattern Recogn. 47:9 (2014), 2794–2806.
60. [60] Zou, J., Li, W., Huang, X., Du, Q., Classification of hyperspectral urban data using adaptive simultaneous orthogonal matching pursuit. J. Appl. Remote Sens., 8, 2014, 085099.
61. [61] Wang, Z., Nasrabadi, N.M., Huang, T.S., Spatial-spectral classification of hyperspectral images using discriminative dictionary designed by learning vector quantization. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 52:8 (2014), 4808–4822.
62. [62] Fang, L., Li, S., Kang, X., Benediktsson, J.A., Spectral-spatial hyperspectral image classification via multiscale adaptive sparse representation. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 52:12 (2014), 7738–7749.
63. [63] Yang, Y., Yuan, H., Li, L., Manifold-based sparse representation for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 52:12 (2014), 7606–7618.
64. [64] Sun, X., Qu, Q., Nasrabadi, N.M., Tran, T.D., Structured priors for sparse-representation-based hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 11:7 (2014), 1235–1239.
65. [65] Wang, J., Jiao, L., Liu, H., Yang, S., Liu, F., Hyperspectral image classification by spatial-spectral derivative-aided kernel joint sparse representation. IEEE J. Select. Top. Appl. Earth Observ. Remote Sens. 8:6 (2015), 2485–2500.
66. [66] Song, B., Li, J., Mura, M.D., Li, P., Plaza, A., J.M.B.-D.J.A. Benediktsson, Chanussot, J., Remotely sensed image classification using sparse representations of morphological attribute profiles. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 52:8 (2014), 5122–5136.
67. [67] Yang, M., Zhang, L., Shiu, S., Zhang, D., Gabor feature based robust representation and classification for face recognition with Gabor occlusion dictionary. Pattern Recogn. 46:7 (2013), 1868–1878.
68. [68] Xu, L., Li, J., Bayesian classification of hyperspectral imagery based on probabilistic sparse representation and Markov random field. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 11:4 (2014), 823–827.
69. [69] Xiong, M., Zhang, F., Ran, Q., Hu, W., Li, W., Representation-based classifications with Markov random field model for hyperspectral urban data. J. Appl. Remote Sens., 8, 2014, 085097.
70. [70] Liu, J., Wu, Z., Wei, Z., Xiao, L., Hyperspectral image classification using kernel sparse representation and semilocal spatial Graph regularization. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 11:8 (2014), 1320–1324.
71. [71] Clausi, D.A., Jernigan, M.E., Designing Gabor filters for optimal texture separability. Pattern Recogn. 33:11 (2000), 1835–1849.
72. [72] Du, Q., Yang, H., Similarity-based unsupervised band selection for hyperspectral image analysis. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 5:4 (2008), 564–568.
73. [73] Jia, S., Shen, L., Li, Q., Gabor feature-based collaborative representation for hyperspectral imagery classification. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 53:2 (2015), 1118–1129.
74. [74] He, L., Li, Y., Li, X., Hu, W., Spectral-spatial classification of hyperspectral images via spatial translation-invariant wavelet-based sparse representation. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 53:5 (2015), 2696–2712.
75. [75] Xue, Z., Li, J., Cheng, L., Du, P., Spectral-spatial classification of hyperspectral data via morphological component analysis-based image separation. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 53:1 (2015), 70–84.
76. [76] Panjwani, D.K., Healey, G., Markov random field models for unsupervised sgementation of textured color images. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 17:10 (1995), 939–954.
77. [77] Fauvel, M., Chanussot, J., Benediktsson, J.A., A spatial-spectral kernel-based approach for the classification of remote-sensing images. Pattern Recogn. 45:1 (2012), 381–392.
78. [78] Chen, Y., Nasrabadi, N.M., Tran, T.D., Hyperspectral image classification via kernel sparse representation. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 51:1 (2013), 217–231.
79. [79] Liu, J., Wu, Z., Wei, Z., Xiao, L., Sun, L., Spatial-spectral kernel sparse representation for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE J. Select. Top. Appl. Earth Observ. Remote Sens. 6:6 (2013), 2462–2471.
80. [80] Qi, B., Zhao, C., Yin, G., Using of customizing kernel sparse representation for hyperspectral image classification. Appl. Opt. 54:4 (2015), 707–716.
81. [81] Kang, C., Liao, S., Xiang, S., Pan, C., Kernel sparse representation with pixel-level and region-level local feature kernels for face recognition. Neurocomputing 133 (2014), 141–152.
82. [82] Li, W., Du, Q., Xiong, M., Kernel collaborative representation with tikhonov regularization for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 12:1 (2015), 48–52.
83. [83] Li, J., Zhang, H., Zhang, L., Column-generation kernel nonlocal joint collaborative representation for hyperspectral image classification. ISPRS J. Photogram. Remote Sens. 94 (2014), 25–36.
84. [84] Wang, D., Lu, H., Yang, M.H., Kernel collaborative face recognition. Pattern Recogn. 48:10 (2015), 3025–3037.
85. [85] Wang, B., Li, W., Poh, N., Liao, Q., Kernel collaborative representation-based classifier for face recognition. Proceedings of the International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2013, 2877–2881 Vancouver, Canada.
86. [86] Yin, J., Liu, Z., Jin, Z., Yang, W., Kernel sparse representation based classification. Neurocomputing 77:1 (2012), 120–128.
87. [87] Zhang, L., Zhou, W., Chang, P., Liu, J., Yan, Z., Wang, T., Li, F., Kernel sparse representation-based classifier. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 60:4 (2012), 1684–1695.
88. [88] Jian, M., Jung, C., Class-discriminative kernel sparse representation-based classification using multi-objective optimization. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 61:18 (2013), 4416–4427.
89. [89] Diaf, A., Boufama, B., Benlamri, R., Non-parametric Fisher's discriminant analysis with kernels for data classification. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 34 (2013), 552–558.
90. [90] Chen, Y., Nasrabadi, N.M., Tran, T.D., Sparse representation for target detection in hyperspectral imagery. IEEE J. Select. Top. Signal Process. 5:3 (2011), 629–640.
91. [91] Cong, Y., Yuan, J., Liu, J., Abnormal event detection in crowded scenes using sparse representation. Pattern Recogn. 46:7 (2013), 1851–1864.
92. [92] Chen, Y., Nasrabadi, N.M., Tran, T.D., Simulanetous joint sparsity model for target detection in hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 8:4 (2011), 676–680.
93. [93] Li, W., Du, Q., Zhang, B., Combined sparse and collaborative representation for hyperspectral target detection. Pattern Recogn. 48 (2015), 3904–3916.
94. [94] Zhang, H., Zhang, L., Du, B., Wang, S., A nonlinear sparse representation-based binary hypothesis model for hyperspectral target detection. IEEE J. Select. Top. Appl. Earth Observ. Remote Sens. 8:6 (2015), 2513–2522.
95. [95] Huang, Z., Shi, Z., Yang, S., Nonlocal similarity regularized sparsity model for hyperspectral target detection. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 10:6 (2013), 1532–1536.
96. [96] Zhang, Y., Du, B., Zhang, L., A sparse representation-based binary hypothesis model for target detection in hyperspectral images. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 53:3 (2015), 1346–1354.
97. [97] Li, J., Zhang, H., Zhang, L., Ma, L., Hyperspectral anomaly detection by the use of background joint sparse representation. IEEE J. Select. Top. Appl. Earth Observ. Remote Sens. 8:6 (2015), 2523–2533.
98. [98] Liu, Y., Wang, B., Hyperspectral spectral target detection using learned dictionary. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 12:7 (2015), 1531–1535.
99. [99] Liu, H., Li, S., Target detection using sparse representation with element and construction combination feature. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 64:2 (2015), 290–298.
100. [100] Li, W., Du, Q., Collaborative representation for hyperspectral anomaly detection. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 53:3 (2015), 1463–1474.
101. [101] Li, W., Chang, L., Du, Q., Representation-based classification for hyperspectral imagery: an Elastic Net regularization approach. Proceedings of the Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing, 2015, Tokyo, Japan.
102. [102] Tuia, D., Flamary, R., Barlaud, M., To be or not to be convex? A study on regularization in hyperspectral image classification. Proceedings of the International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2015, Milan, Italy.