The effects of sequence and delay on crowd work

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn 2015-April, Issue , 2015, Pages 1375-1378

  Lasecki, Walter S ^a   Rzeszotarski, Jeffrey M ^b   Marcus, Adam ^c   Bigham, Jeffrey P ^b  

^a University of Rochester   (United States)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Locu / GoDaddy ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Continuity; Crowdsourcing; Efficiency; Human computation; Interruptions; Workflows

Indexed keywords

EFFICIENCY; HUMAN ENGINEERING;

CONTINUITY; CROWDSOURCING; HUMAN COMPUTATION; INTERRUPTIONS; WORK-FLOWS;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 84950997204     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2702123.2702594     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Adamczyk, P. D., and Bailey, B. P. If not now, when?: The effects of interruption at different moments within task execution. In CHI 2004.
2. Bernstein, M. S., et al.Soylent: A word processor with a crowd inside. In Proc. UIST, pages 313-322, 2010.
3. Bigham, J. P. et. al. Vizwiz: Nearly real-time answers to visual questions. In Proc. UIST, pages 333-342, 2010.
4. Cabon, P., Coblentz, A., and Mollard, R. Interruption of a monotonous activity with complex tasks: Effects of individual differences. In Human Factors Society, 1990.
5. Chilton, L. B., Horton, J. J., Miller, R. C., and Azenkot, S. Task search in a human computation market. In HCOMP 2010.
6. Cutrell, E., Czerwinski, M., and Horvitz, E. Notification, disruption, and memory: Effects of messaging interruptions on memory and performance. In Proc. INTERACT, pages 263-269, 2001.
7. Dow, S., Kulkarni, A., Klemmer, S., and Hartmann, B.. Shepherding the crowd yields better work. In Proc. CSCW, pages 1013-1022, 2012.
8. Gillie, T. and Broadbent, D.. What makes interruptions disruptive? a study of length, similarity, and complexity. Psychological Research, 50:243-50, 1989.
9. Jansset, C. P., and Brumby, D. P. Strategic adaptation to performance objectives in a dualtask setting. Cognitive Science, 34(8):1548-1560, 2010.
10. Kreifeldt, J. G., and McCarthy, M. E. Interruption as a test of the user-computer interface. In Proc. MC, 1981.
11. Lasecki, W. S., Murray, K., White, S., Miller, R. C., and Bigham, J. P. Real-time crowd control of existing interfaces. In Proc. UIST, pages 23-32, 2011.
12. Lasecki, W. S., White, S., Murray, K. I., and Bigham, J. P. Crowd memory: Learning in the collective. In Proc. Collective Intelligence, 2012.
13. Pattyn, N., Neyt, X., Henderickx, D., and Soetens, E. Psychophysiological investigation of vigilance decrement: Boredom or cognitive fatigue? Physiology and Behavior, 93(1-2):369-378, 2008.