Comment: Estimating the effects caused by treatments

Journal of the American Statistical Association

Volumn 79, Issue 385, 1984, Pages 26-28

  Rosenbaum, Paul R ^a   Rubin, Donald B ^b  

^a EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84950455993     PISSN: 01621459     EISSN: 1537274X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1984.10477057     Document Type: Note

References (19)

1. COCHRAN, W.G. (1965), “The Planning of Observational Studies of Human Populations” (with discussion), Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 128, 234–255.
2. —— (1968), “The Effectiveness of Adjustment by Subclassification in Removing Bias in Observational Studies,” Biometrics, 24, 295–313.
3. —— (1972), “Observational Studies,” in Statistical Papers in Honor of George W. Snedecor, Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press, 77–90.
4. COCHRAN, W.G., and RUBIN, D. (1973), “Controlling Bias in Observational Studies: A Review,” Sankhyā, A35, 417–446.
5. COX, D.R. (1958), The Planning of Experiments, New York: John Wiley.
6. DAWID, A.P. (1979), “Conditional Independence in Statistical Theory” (with discussion), Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Ser. B, 41, 1–31.
7. FISHER, R.A. (1935), The Design of Experiments, Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.
8. HAMILTON, M.A. (1979), “Choosing a Parameter for 2×2 Table or 2×2×2 Table Analysis,” American Journal of Epidemiology, 109, 362–375.
9. HOLLAND, P.W., and RUBIN, D.B. (1983), “On Lord’s Paradox,” in Principles of Modern Psychological Measurement: A Festschrift for Frederic M. Lord, eds. H. Wainerand S. Messick, Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10. KEMPTHORNE, O. (1952), The Design and Analysis of Experiments, New York: John Wiley.
11. LORD, F.M. (1967), “A Paradox in the Interpretation of Group Comparisons,” Psychological Bulletin, 68, 304–305.
12. ROSENBAUM, P.R., and RUBIN, D.B. (1983a), “The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects,” Biometrika, 70, 41–55.
13. —— (1983b), “Assessing Sensitivity to an Unobserved Binary Co-variate in an Observational Study With Binary Outcome,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Ser. B, 2, 45, 212–218.
14. RUBIN, D.B. (1974), “Estimating Causal Effects of Treatments in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 688–701.
15. —— (1977), “Assignment to Treatment Group on the Basis of a Co-variate,” Journal of Educational Statistics, 2, 1–26.
16. —— (1978), “Bayesian Inference for Causal Effects: The Role of Randomization,” Annals of Statistics, 6, 34–58.
17. —— (1979), “Discussion” of “Conditional Independence in Statistical Theory” by A.P. Dawid, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Ser. B, 41, 27–28.
18. —— (1980), “Discussion” of “Randomization Analysis of Experimental Data: The Fisher Randomization Test” by D. Basu, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 75, 591–593.
19. —— (1983), “William G. Cochran’s Contributions to the Design, Analysis, and Evaluation of Observational Studies,” in Research Work of William G. Cochran, eds. S. Rao and J. Sedransk, New York: John Wiley.