Measures, models, and graphical displays in the analysis of cross-classified data

Journal of the American Statistical Association

Volumn 86, Issue 416, 1991, Pages 1085-1111

  Goodman, Leo A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Canonical correlation; Contingency table analysis; Correlation models; Correspondence analysis; Independence and nonindependence models; Log linear and association models; Symmetric and asymmetric association; Symmetry and asymmetry models

Indexed keywords

EID: 84950455461     PISSN: 01621459     EISSN: 1537274X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1991.10475155     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Abildgård, F. (1974), Discussion of “The Notion of Redundancy and Its Use as a Quantitative Measure of the Discrepancy Between a Statistical Hypothesis and a Set of Observational Data,” by P. Martin-Löf, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 1, 13–15.
2. Agresti, A., and Kezouh, A. (1983). “Association Models for Multidimensional Cross-Classifications of Ordinal Variables,” Communications in Statistics, Part A—Theory and Methods, 12, 1261–1276.
3. Altham, P. M. E. (1970), “The Measurement of Association of Rows and Columns for an r × s Contingency Table,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Ser. B, 32, 63–73.
4. Andersen, E. B. (1980), Discrete Statistical Models With Social Science Applications, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
5. —— (1986), Discussion of “Some Useful Extensions of the Usual Correspondence Analysis Approach and the Usual Log-Linear Models Approach in the Analysis of Contingency Tables,” by L. A. Goodman, International Statistical Review, 54, 271–272.
6. —— (1990), The Statistical Analysis of Categorical Data, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
7. Berkson, J. (1938), “Some Difficulties of the Interpretation Encountered in the Application of the Chi-Square Test,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 33, 526–542.
8. Becker, M. P. (1989a), “On the Bivariate Normal Distribution and Association Models for Ordinal Categorical Data,” Statistics & Probability Letters, 8, 435–440.
9. —— (1989b), “Models for the Analysis of Association in Multivariate Contingency Tables,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84, 1014–1019.
10. —— (1990a), “Quasisymmetric Association Models for the Analysis of Square Contingency Tables,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Ser. B, 52, 369–378.
11. —— (1990b), “Maximum Likelihood Estimation of the RC(M) Association Model,” Applied Statistics, 39, 152–167.
12. Becker, M. P., and Clogg, C. C. (1989), “Analysis of Sets of Two-Way Contingency Tables Using Association Models,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84, 142–151.
13. Benzécri, J.-P. (1969), “Statistical Analysis as a Tool to Make Patterns Emerge From Data,” in Methodologies of Pattern Recognition, ed. S. Watanabe, New York: Academic Press, pp. 35–73.
14. —— (1973), L’Analyse des Données: 1. La Taxonomie; 2. L’Analyse des Correspondances, Paris: Dunod (2nd ed., 1976).
15. Caussinus, H. (1966), “Contribution à l’Analyse Statistique de Tableaux de Corrélation,” Annales de la Faculté des Sciences de l’Université de Toulouse, 29, 77–182.
16. Choulakian, V. (1988), “Exploratory Analysis of Contingency Tables by Loglinear Formulation and Generalization of Correspondence Analysis,” Psychometrika, 53, 235–250.
17. Christiansen, U., and Stene, J. (1969), The G. Rasch Textbook in Theoretical Statistics, (in Danish), Copenhagen: Teknisk Forlag.
18. Clogg, C. C. (1982), “Some Models for the Analysis of Association in Multiway Cross-Classifications Having Ordered Categories,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 77, 803–815.
19. Cramér, H. (1945), Mathematical Methods of Statistics, Stockholm: Almquist and Wiksell.
20. Diaconis, P., and Efron, B. (1985), “Testing for Independence in a Two-Way Table: New Interpretations of the Chi-Square Statistic” with discussion, The Annals of Statistics, 13, 845–913.
21. Edwards, A. W. F. (1963), “The Measure of Association in a 2 x 2 Contingency Table,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Ser. A, 126, 109–114.
22. Escofier, B. (1984), “Analyse Factorielle en Référence a un Modèle: Application a l’Analyse de Tableaux d’Echanges,” Revue de Statistique Appliquée, 32, 25–36.
23. Escoufier, Y. (1988), “Beyond Correspondence Analysis,” in Classification and Related Methods of Data Analysis, ed. H. H. Bock, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 505–514.
24. Escoufier, Y., and Junca, S. (1986), Discussion of “Some Useful Extensions of the Usual Correspondence Analysis Approach and the Usual Log-Linear Models Approach in the Analysis of Contingency Tables,” by L. A. Goodman, International Statistical Review, 54, 279–283.
25. Fisher, R. A. (1925), Statistical Methods for Research Workers (1st ed.), Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.
26. Gabriel, K. R. (1971), “The Biplot Graphic Display of Matrices With Application to Principal Component Analysis,” Biometrika, 54, 453–467.
27. GAUSS System Version 2.0 (1988), Kent, WA: Aptech Systems, Inc.
28. Gift, A. (1990), Non-Linear Multivariate Analysis, New York: John Wiley.
29. Gilula, Z. (1984), “On Some Similarities Between Canonical Correlation Models and Latent Class Models for Two-Way Contingency Tables,” Biometrika, 71, 523–529.
30. Gilula, Z., and Haberman, S. J. (1986), “Canonical Analysis of Two-Way Contingency Tables by Maximum Likelihood,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 780–788.
31. —— (1988), “The Analysis of Multivariate Contingency Tables by Restricted Canonical and Restricted Association Models,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 760–771.
32. Gilula, Z., Krieger, A., and Ritov, Y. (1988), “Ordinal Association in Contingency Tables: Some Interpretive Aspects,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 540–545.
33. Gittins, R. (1985), Canonical Analysis, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
34. Glass, D. V. (ed.) (1954), Social Mobility in Britain, Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
35. Goodman, L. A. (1965), “On the Multivariate Analysis of Three Dichotomous Variables,” American Journal of Sociology, 71, 290–301.
36. —— (1969), “How to Ransack Social Mobility Tables and Other Kinds of Cross-Classification Tables,” American Journal of Sociology, 75, 1–40.
37. —— (1970), “The Multivariate Analysis of Qualitative Data: Interactions Among Multiple Classifications,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 65, 226–256.
38. —— (1972), “Some Multiplicative Models for the Analysis of Cross-Classified Data,” in Proceedings of the Sixth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability (Vol. 1), eds. L. Le Cam, J. Neyman, and E. L. Scott, Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 649–696.
39. —— (1978), Analyzing Qualitative/Categorical Data: Log-Linear Models and Latent-Structure Analysis, Cambridge, MA: Abt Books.
40. —— (1979a), “Simple Models for the Analysis of Association in Cross-Classifications Having Ordered Categories,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 537–552.
41. —— (1979b), “Multiplicative Models for the Analysis of Occupational Mobility Tables and Other Kinds of Cross-Classification Tables,” American Journal of Sociology, 84, 804–819.
42. —— (1981a), “Association Models and Canonical Correlation in the Analysis of Cross-Classifications Having Ordered Categories,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76, 320–334.
43. —— (1981b), “Association Models and the Bivariate Normal for Contingency Tables With Ordered Categories,” Biometrika, 68, 347–355.
44. —— (1981c), “Three Elementary Views of Log-Linear Models for the Analysis of Cross-Classifications Having Ordered Categories,” Sociological Methodology, 1981, ed. S. Leinhardt, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 193–239.
45. —— (1981d), “Criteria for Determining Whether Certain Categories in a Cross-Classification Table Should Be Combined, With Special Reference to Occupational Categories in an Occupational Mobility Table,” American Journal of Sociology, 87, 612–650.
46. —— (1983), “The Analysis of Dependence in Cross-Classifications Having Ordered Categories Using Log-Linear Models for Frequencies and Log-Linear Models for Odds,” Biometrics, 39, 149–160.
47. —— (1984), The Analysis of Cross-Classified Data Having Ordered Categories, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
48. —— (1985a), “The Analysis of Cross-Classified Data Having Ordered and/or Unordered Categories: Association Models, Correlation Models, and Asymmetry Models for Contingency Tables With or Without Missing Entries,” The Annals of Statistics, 13, 10–69.
49. —— (1985b), “Correspondence Analysis Models, Log-Linear Models, and Log-Bilinear Models for the Analysis of Contingency Tables,” Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute, 51, Book 4, 28.1, 1–14.
50. —— (1985c), “New Methods for the Analysis of Two-Way Contingency Tables: An Alternative to Diaconis and Efron, “Discussion of “Testing for Independence in a Two-Way Table: New Interpretations of the Chi-Square Statistic,” by P. Diaconis and B. Efron, The Annals of Statistics, 13, 887–893.
51. —— (1986a), “Some Useful Extensions of the Usual Correspondence Analysis Approach and the Usual Log-Linear Models Approach in the Analysis of Contingency Tables” with discussion, International Statistical Review, 54, 243–270.
52. —— (1986b), “New Methods in the Age of Progress in the Analysis of Contingency Tables,” Reply to discussion of “Some Useful Extensions of the Usual Correspondence Analysis Approach and the Usual Log-Linear Models Approach in the Analysis of Contingency Tables,” by L. A. Goodman, International Statistical Review, 54, 291–309.
53. —— (1987), “New Methods for Analyzing the Intrinsic Character of Qualitative Variables Using Cross-Classified Data,” American Journal of Sociology, 93, 529–583.
54. Goodman, L. A., and Haberman, S. J. (1990), “The Analysis of Non-additivity in Two-Way Analysis of Variance,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 139–145.
55. Goodman, L. A., and Kruskal, W. H. (1979), Measures of Association for Cross Classifications, New York: Springer-Verlag.
56. Green, M. (1989), “Generalizations of the Goodman Association Model for the Analysis of Multidimensional Contingency Tables,” in Statistical Modeling (Lecture Notes in Statistics 57), eds. A. Decarli, B. J. Francis, R. Gilchrist, and G. V. H. Seber, New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 165–171.
57. Greenacre, M. J. (1984), Theory and Applications of Correspondence Analysis, New York: Academic Press.
58. Haberman, S. H. (1974), The Analysis of Frequency Data, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
59. —— (1981), “Tests of Independence in Two-Way Contingency Tables Based on Canonical Correlation and on Linear-by-Linear Interaction,” The Annals of Statistics, 9, 1178–1186.
60. Hope, K. (1981), “Vertical Mobility in Britain: A Structured Analysis,” Sociology, 15, 19–55.
61. Hout, M. (1982), “Using Uniform Association Models,” in Quantitative Criminology, ed. J. Hagen, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 115–128.
62. Hout, M., Duncan, O. D., and Sobel, M. E. (1987), “Association and Heterogeneity: Structural Models of Similarities and Differences,” Sociological Methodology, ed. C. C. Clogg, Washington, DC: American Sociological Association, pp. 145–184.
63. Ihm, P., and van Groenewoud, H. (1984), “Correspondence Analysis and Gaussian Ordination,” in Compstat Lectures (Vol. 3), eds. J. M. Chambers, J. Gordesch, A. Klas, L. Lebart, P. P. Sint, Vienna: Physica-Verlag, pp. 5–60.
64. Israëls, A. (1987), Eigenvalue Techniques for Qualitative Data, Leiden: DSWO.
65. Johnson, D. E., and Graybill, F. A. (1972), “An Analysis of a Two-Way Model With Interaction and No Replications,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 67, 862–868.
66. Kendall, M. G., and Stuart, A. (1961), The Advanced Theory of Statistics: Vol. 2. Inference and Relationship, London: Charles W. Griffin.
67. Lancaster, H. O. (1957), “Some Properties of the Bivariate Normal Distribution Considered in the Form of a Contingency Table,” Biometrika, 44, 289–292.
68. Lauritzen, S. L., and Wermuth, N. (1989), “Graphical Models for Association Between Variables, Some of Which Are Qualitative and Some Quantitative,” The Annals of Statistics, 17, 31–54.
69. Lauro, N., and D’Ambra. L. (1984), “L’Analyse Non Symetrique Des Correspondances,” in Data Analysis and Informatics (Vol. 3), eds. E. Diday, M. Jamu, L. Lebart, J. Pages, R. Tomassone, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers (North-Holland), pp. 433–446.
70. Mandel, J. (1971), “A New Analysis of Variance Models for Non-Additive Data,” Technometrics, 13, 1–18.
71. Martin-Löf, P. (1974), “The Notion of Redundancy and Its Use as a Quantitative Measure of the Discrepancy Between a Statistical Hypothesis and a Set of Observational Data” with discussion, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 1, 3–18.
72. Miller, S. M. (1960), “Comparative Social Mobility,” Current Sociology, 9, 1–89.
73. Mosteller, F. (1968), “Association and Estimation in Contingency Tables,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 63, 1–28.
74. National Bureau of Standards (1959), Tables of the Bivariate Normal Distribution Function and Related Functions (Applied Mathematics Series 50), Washington, DC: U.S. Printing Office.
75. Rasch, G. (1966), Statistikkens Teori, Lecture notes compiled by U. Christiansen in Danish, Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen.
76. Rom, D., and Sarkar, S. K. (1990), “Approximating Probability Integrals of Multivariate Normal Using Association Models,” Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 35, 109–119.
77. Takane, Y. (1987), “Analysis of Contingency Tables by Ideal Point Discriminant Analysis,” Psychometrika, 52, 493–513.
78. Theil, H. (1972), Statistical Decomposition Analysis, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
79. Tukey, J. W. (1949), “One Degree of Freedom for Nonadditivity,” Biometrics, 5, 232–242.
80. —— (1977), Exploratory Data Analysis, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
81. van der Heijden, P. G. M., de Falguerolles, A., and de Leeuw, J. (1989), “A Combined Approach to Contingency Table Analysis Using Correspondence Analysis and Log-Linear Analysis” with discussion, Applied Statistics, 38, 249–292.
82. Wang, Y. J. (1987), “The Probability Integrals of Bivariate Normal Distributions: A Contingency Table Approach,” Biometrika, 74, 185–190.
83. Whittaker, J. (1989), Discussion of “A Combined Approach to Contingency Table Analysis Using Correspondence Analysis and Log-Linear Analysis,” by P. G. M. van der Heijden, A. de Falguerolles, and J. de Leeuw, Applied Statistics, 38, 278–279.
84. Yamaguchi, K. (1990), “Some Models for the Analysis of Asymmetric Association in Square Contingency Tables With Ordered Categories,” Sociological Methodology 1990, ed. C. C. Clogg, Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.