Students’ motivational traits and preferences for different instructional modes in science education‐Part 2

International Journal of Science Education

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 1990, Pages 205-216

  Kempa, R F ^a   Diaz, Maria Martin ^a  

^a KEELE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84950436263     PISSN: 09500693     EISSN: 14645289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0950069900120209     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Adar, L. 1969, A Theoretical Framework for the Study of Motivation in Education (The Hebrew University School of Education, Jerusalem) [in Hebrew].
2. Clifford, M. M. 1988, Failure tolerance and academic risk-taking in ten to twelve year old students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 58, pp. 15-27.
3. Dodge, B. J., 1978, Towards a conceptual framework for motivational design. NSPI Journal, Vol. 17, pp. 8-10.
4. Eggleston, J. F., Galton, M. J. and Jones, M. E. 1976, Processes and Products of Science Teaching (Macmillan Education, London).
5. Good, T. L. and Power, C. N. 1976, Designing successful classroom environments for different types of student. Journal of Curriculum Studies, Vol. 8, pp. 45-60.
6. Heathcote, G., Kempa, R. F. and Roberts, I. F. 1982, Curriculum Styles and Strategies (des, Further Education Curriculum Review and Development Unit, London).
7. Hofstein, A. and Kempa, R. F. 1985, Motivating strategies in science education: Attempt at an analysis. European Journal of Science Education, Vol. 7, pp. 221-229.
8. Kempa, R. F. and Martin Diaz, Maria 1990, Motivational traits and preferences for different instructional modes in science-Part 1: Students’ motivational traits. International Journal of Science Education, Vol. 12, pp. 194—203.
9. Martin Diaz, M. 1989, Students’ motivational patterns and preferences for different instructional modes in science education (MA dissertation, University of Keele).
10. McCelland, D. C., Atkinson, J. W., Clarke, R. W. and Lowell, E. L. 1953, The Achievement Motive (Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York).
11. Orbach, E. 1979, Simulation games and motivation for learning. A theoretical framework. Simulation and Games, Vol. 10, pp. 3—40.
12. Schneider, K. and Posse, N. 1982, Risk taking in achievement oriented situations: Do people really maximize affect or competence information? Motivation and Emotion, Vol. 6, pp. 259-271.