Modeling the carbon consequences of pro-environmental consumer behavior

Applied Energy

Volumn 184, Issue , 2016, Pages 1207-1216

  Duarte, Rosa ^a   Feng, Kuishuang ^b   Hubacek, Klaus ^b   Sánchez Chóliz, Julio ^a   Sarasa, Cristina ^a,b   Sun, Laixiang ^b,c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZARAGOZA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED SYSTEMS ANALYSIS   (Austria)

Author keywords

CGE model; Consumption patterns; Emissions abatement; Environmental behavior; Rebound effect

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS; PUBLIC POLICY; SULFUR DIOXIDE;

CGE MODEL; CONSUMPTION PATTERNS; EMISSIONS ABATEMENTS; ENVIRONMENTAL BEHAVIOR; REBOUND EFFECT;

CONSUMER BEHAVIOR;

ABATEMENT COST; CARBON; CARBON EMISSION; CONSUMPTION BEHAVIOR; ECONOMIC POLICY; EMISSION CONTROL; ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM ANALYSIS; METHANE; POLLUTION TAX; PUBLIC TRANSPORT; SULFUR DIOXIDE;

SPAIN;

EID: 84950243999     PISSN: 03062619     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.09.101     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. [1] UNEP. Agenda 200, United Nations Environment Programme, 2001.
2. [2] Tabi, A., Does pro-environmental behaviour affect carbon emissions?. Energy Policy 63 (2013), 972–981.
3. [3] Munksgaard, J., Wier, M., Lenzen, M., Dey, C., Using structural economics to measure the environmental pressure of consumption at different spatial levels. J Ind Ecol 9:1/2 (2005), 169–185.
4. [4] European Commission, Review of the EU Sustainable Development Strategy, 2009.
5. [5] Chitnis, M., Sorrell, S., Druckman, A., Firth, S.K., Jackson, T., Who rebounds most? Estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for different UK socioeconomic groups. Ecol Econ 106 (2014), 12–32.
6. [6] Hubacek, K., Guan, D., The net effect of green lifestyles. Nature Climate Change 1 (2011), 250–251.
7. [7] Li, K., Lin, B., Heterogeneity in rebound effects: Estimated results and impact of China's fossil-fuel subsidies. Appl Energy 149 (2015), 148–160.
8. [8] Sorrell, S., Dimitropoulos, J., Sommerville, M., Empirical estimates of direct rebound effects. Energy Policy 37 (2009), 1356–1371.
9. [9] NSI. The Survey on Households and the Environment 2008, National Statistics Institute, Madrid, Spain, 2008.
10. [10] Duchin, F., Consumption, environmentally significant. Int Encyclopedia Soc Behav Sci, 2001, 2678–2682.
11. [11] Duchin F. Household lifestyles. Ideas for a research program, rensselaer working papers in economics 0310. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. 2003. < http://www.economics.rpi.edu/workingpapers/rpi0310.pdf>.
12. [12] Hubacek, K., Sun, L., A scenario analysis of China's land use change: incorporating biophysical information into input-output modeling. Struct Change Econ Dyn 12:4 (2001), 367–397.
13. [13] Duchin, F., Hubacek, K., Linking social expenditures to household lifestyles. Futures 35 (2003), 61–74.
14. [14] Minx, J.C., Wiedmann, T., Wood, R., Peters, G.P., Lenzen, M., Owen, A., et al. Input-output analysis and carbon footprinting: an overview of applications. Econ Syst Res 21:3 (2009), 187–216.
15. [15] Duarte, R., Mainar, A., Sánchez-Chóliz, J., The impact of household consumption patterns on emissions in Spain. Energy Econ 32 (2010), 176–185.
16. [16] Tian, X., Chang, M., Lin, C., Tanikawa, H., China's carbon footprint: a regional perspective on the effect of transitions in consumption and production patterns. Appl Energy 123 (2014), 19–28.
17. [17] Burniaux J, Truong T. GTAP-E: An Energy-Environmental Version of the GTAP Model. GTAP Technical (Paper no. 16, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN), 2002.
18. [18] Igos, E., Rugani, B., Rege, S., Benetto, E., Drouet, L., Zachary, D.S., Combination of equilibrium models and hybrid life cycle-input-output analysis to predict the environmental impacts of energy policy scenarios. Appl Energy 145 (2015), 234–245.
19. [19] Liu, Y., Lu, Y., The economic impact of different carbon tax revenue recycling schemes in China: A model-based scenario analysis. Appl Energy 141 (2015), 96–105.
20. [20] NSI. Supply and use matrices. Input-Output Framework 2008, National Statistics Institute, Madrid, Spain, 2008.
21. [21] Rueda-Cantuche, J., Beutel, J., Neuwahl, F., Mongelli, I., Loeschel, A., A symmetric input-output table For Eu27: latest progress. Econ Syst Res 21:1 (2009), 59–79.
22. [22] Suárez M, Jácome R, Teijeiro MT, Vilas C. Metodología utilizada en la elaboración de la matriz simétrica del Marco Input-Output de Galicia 2005 (MIOGAL-2005) Paper presented at the Jornadas Estadísticas de las Comunidades Autónomas, Cáceres, 2010.
23. [23] NSI. Household Budget Survey, National Statistics Institute, Madrid, Spain, 2008c.
24. [24] Liu X, Bohlin L, Effects from consistent internalization of external effects from transport and manufacturing – a CGE analysis for Sweden, Working Paper 09/2012, Swedish Business School. 2012, ISSN 1403-0586.
25. [25] De Melo, J., Tarr, D., A general equilibrium analysis of US foreign trade policy. 1992, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
26. [26] De Schoutheete D. Control of Carbon Emissions and Energy Fiscal Reform in Spain. A Computable General Equilibrium Assessment. Ph.D. thesis. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, 2012.
27. [27] Paltsev S, Viguier L, Babiker M, Reilly J, Tay KH. Disaggregating Household Transport in the MIT-EPPA Model (MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change Technical Note, no. 5), 2004.
28. [28] Rutherford TF, Paltsev SV. GTAP-Energy in GAMS: The Dataset and Static Model, Discussion Papers in Economics (WP n°00-2, Center for Economic Analysis, Department of Economics, University of Colorado), 2000.
29. [29] Hertel, T.W., Global trade analysis. modelling and applications. 1997, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
30. [30] Blanchflower, D.G., Oswald, A.J., TheWage Curve. Scand J Econ 92 (1990), 215–235.
31. [31] Küster R, Ellerdorfer I, Fahl U. A CGE-analysis of energy policies considering labor market imperfections and technology specifications (FEEMWorking Papers, n°73), 2007.
32. [32] IPCC. Intergovernmental panel on climate change, fourth assessment report. Direct Global Warming Potentials, 2007.
33. [33] NSI. Accounts emissions by industry and households as final consumers, National Statistics Institute, Madrid, Spain, 2008.
34. [34] Timmer MP, editor. The World Input-Output Database (WIOD): Contents, Sources and Methods,WIOD Working Paper Number 10, 2012.
35. 2 Emissions modeled by sector and energy commodity. World Input Output Database Project, 2008. < http://www.wiod.org/database/iot.htm>.
36. [36] MAGRAMA, National pollutant release inventory to the atmosphere. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment, Madrid, Spain, 2008.
37. [37] Duarte, R., Rebahi, S., Sánchez-Chóliz, J., Sarasa, C., Households’ behavior and environmental emissions in a regional economy. Econ Syst Res 26:4 (2014), 410–430.
38. [38] Ferng, J.J., Toward a scenario analysis framework for energy footprints. Ecol Econ 40 (2002), 53–69.
39. [39] Hanley, N.D., McGregor, P.G., Swales, J.K., Turner, K., The impact of a stimulus to energy efficiency on the economy and the environment: a regional computable general equilibrium analysis. Renewable Energy 31 (2006), 161–171.
40. [40] McDonald, G.W., Patterson, M.G., Ecological footprints and interdependencies of New Zealand regions. Ecol Econ 50 (2004), 49–67.
41. [41] Resosudarmo, B.P., River water pollution in Indonesia: an input-output analysis. Int J Environ Sustain Dev 2 (2003), 62–77.
42. [42] Sánchez-Chóliz, J., Duarte, R., Mainar, A., Environmental impact of household activity in Spain. Ecol Econ 62 (2007), 308–318.
43. [43] Turner, K., Munday, M., McGregor, P., Swales, K., How responsible is a region for its carbon emissions? An empirical general equilibrium analysis. Ecol Econ 76 (2012), 70–78.
44. [44] Federal Statistical Office of Germany, Income, consumption, living conditions, housing. Berlin, 2014.
45. [45] REMODECE survey. REMODECE-EIE/05/124/SI2.419657. Residential Monitoring to Decrease Energy Use and Carbon Emissions in Europe, University of Coimbra, Portugal, 2012.
46. [46] GAP. Promoting Highly Efficient Appliances. Global Action Plan, 2013.
47. [47] ADEME. French higher domestic specific electricity consumption Compared to Germany: Explanatory Factors Assessment, Agence de l'Environnement et de la Maîtrise de l'Energie, SOWATT and ENERDATA, France, 2012.
48. [48] EMTA, EMTA barometer of public transport in the european metropolitan areas. 2012, European Metropolitan Transport Authorities.
49. [49] Chen, S.Q., Chen, B., Network environ perspective for urban metabolism and carbon emissions: a case study of Vienna, Austria. Environ Sci Technol 46:8 (2012), 4498–4506.
50. [50] Chen, S.Q., Chen, B., Urban energy consumption: different insights from energy flow analysis, input-output analysis and ecological network analysis. Appl Energy 138 (2015), 99–107.
51. [51] SENC, Guía de la alimentación saludable. 2007, Sociedad Española de Nutrición Comunitaria, Barcelona, Spain.
52. [52] European Commission, energy taxation: commission promotes energy efficiency and more environmental friendly products. Brussels, Belgium, 2011.
53. [53] Bordigoni, M., Hita, A., Le Blanc, G., Role of embodied energy in the European manufacturing industry: application to short-term impacts of a carbon tax. Energy Policy 43 (2012), 335–350.
54. [54] Rocchi, P., Serrano, M., Roca, J., The reform of the European energy tax directive: exploring potential economic impacts in the EU27. Energy Policy 75 (2014), 341–353.