A Rhetorical Schema For The Evaluation Of Visual Imagery

Communication Studies

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 1994, Pages 213-224

  Foss, Sonja K ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84950243194     PISSN: 10510974     EISSN: 17451035     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10510979409368425     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Audigier, J. Y. (1991). Connections. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
2. Beardsley, M. C. (1962). On the generality of critical reasons. Journal of Philosophy, 59,477-486.
3. Benson, T. W. (1985). The rhetorical structure of Frederick Wiseman's Primate. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 77,204-217.
4. Berger, A. A. (1991). Media analysis techniques (rev. ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5. Best, S., & Kellner, D. (1991). Postmodern theory: Critical interrogations. New York: Guilford.
6. Blair, C., Jeppeson, M. S., & Pucci, Jr., E. (1991). Public memorializing in postmodernity: The Vietnam Veterans Memorial as prototype. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 77, 263-288.
7. Bongard, W. (1983). Pock and balsa: Criteria of quality in the visual arts of the twentieth century. Studio International, 196, 28-31.
8. Broder, M. (1994, January). [Telephone interview with public relations director for The NAMES Project AIDS Memorial Quilt].
9. Brown, J. C. (1983). Excellence and the problem of visual literacy. Design for Arts in Education, 85, 11-13.
10. Brummett, B. (1991). Rhetorical dimensions of popular culture. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
11. Campbell, K. (1988). Enactment as a rhetorical strategy in The Year of Living Dangerously, 39, 258-268.
12. Davies, S. (1982). The aesthetic relevance of authors” and painters” intentions. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 41, 65-76.
13. DeSousa, M. A. (1984). Symbolic action and pretended insight: The Ayatollah Khomeini in U. S. editorial cartoons. In M. J. Medhurst & T. W. Benson (Ed.), Rhetorical dimensions in media: A critical casebook (pp. 204-230). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
14. Feagin, S. L. (1982). On defining and interpreting art intentionalistically. British Journal of Aesthetics, 22, 65-77.
15. Fenster, M. (1991). The problem of taste within the problematic of culture. Communication Theory, 1, 87-105.
16. Foss, S. K. (1986). Ambiguity as persuasion: The Vietnam Veterans Memorial. Communication Quarterly, 34, 326-340.
17. Foss, S. K. (1987). Body art: Insanity as communication. Central States Speech Journal, 38, 122-131.
18. Foss, S. K. (1988). Judy Chicago's The Dinner Party: Empowering of women's voice in visual art. In B. Bate & A. Taylor (Ed.), Women communicating: Studies of women's talk (pp. 9-26). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
19. Foss, S. K. (1993). The construction of appeal in visual images: A hypothesis. In D. Zarefsky (Ed.), Rhetorical movement: Essays in honor of Leland M. Griffin (pp. 210”224). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
20. Foss, S. K., & Gill, A. (1987). Michel Foucault's theory of rhetoric as epistemic. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 51, 384”401.
21. Foster, H. (1985). Recodings: Art, spectacle, cultural politics. Seattle: Bay.
22. Frentz, T. S., & Rushing, J. H. (1993). Integrating ideology and archetype in rhetorical criticism, part II: A case study of Jaws. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 79, 61-81.
23. Fuller, P. (1984). Taste You can't opt out. Design, 423, 38-43.
24. Gerard, A. (1963). An essay on taste. Gainesville, FL: Scholars” Facsimiles & Reprints. (Original work published 1759)
25. Gracyk, T. A. (1990). Having bad taste. British Journal of Aesthetics, 30, 117-131.
26. Haines, H. W. (1986). “What kind of war?”: An analysis of the Vietnam Veterans Memorial. Critical Studies.in Mass Communication, 3, 1” 20.
27. Horn, R. (1986). Memphis: Objects, furniture, and patterns. Philadelphia: Running.
28. Jamieson, K. H. (1988). Eloquence in an electronic age: The transformation of political speech making. New York: Oxford University Press.
29. Jamieson, K. H. (1992). Dirty politics: Deception, distraction, and democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
30. Kanengieter, M. R. (1991). Message formation from architecture: A rhetorical analysis. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, 1990). Dissertation Abstracts International, 51, 35-61 A.
31. Kant, I. (1892). Kant's kritik of judgment (J. H. Bernard, Trans). New York: Macmillan. (Original work published 1790)
32. Kant, I. (1911). Kant's critique of aesthetic judgement (J. C. Meredith, Trans.). Oxford: Clarendon. (Original work published 1790)
33. Kaplan, S. J. (1990). Visual metaphors in the representation of communication technology. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 7, 37-47.
34. Lyas, C. (1983). Anything goes: The intentional fallacy revisited. British Journal of Aesthetics, 23, 291-305.
35. Medhurst, M. J. (1982). Hiroshima, Mon Amour: From iconography to rhetoric. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 68, 345-370.
36. Nordstrom, K. E. (1990, November). The Threads that Run Too True: Ambiguity and Specificity in The NAMES Project Memorial Quilt. Paper presented at the convention of the Speech Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
37. Novitz, D. (1989). Ways of artmaking: The high and the popular in art. British Journal of Aesthetics, 29, 213-229.
38. Olson, L. C. (1990). Benjamin Franklin's commemorative medal Libertas Americana: A study in rhetorical iconology. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 76, 23-45.
39. Owens, C. (1983). The discourse of others: Feminists and postmodernism. In H. Foster (Ed.), The anti-aesthetic: Essays on postmodern culture (pp. 57-82). Seattle: Bay.
40. Postman, N. (1985). Amusing ourselves to death: Public discourse in the age of show business. New York: Sifton/Penguin.
41. Reid, K. (1990). The Hay-Wain: Cluster analysis in visual communication. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 14, 40-54.
42. Reimer, B. (1984). Choosing art for education: Criteria for quality. Design for Arts in Education, 85, 4-10.
43. Rosenfield, L. W. (1989). Central Park and the celebration of civic virtue. In T. W. Benson (Ed.), American rhetoric: Context and criticism (pp. 221-266). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
44. Rushing, J. H. (1985). E.T. as rhetorical transcendence. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 71, 188-203.
45. Ruskin, C. (1988). The Quilt: Stories from The NAMES Project. New York: Pocket.
46. Shapiro, G. (1974). Intention and interpretation in art: A semiotic analysis. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 33,33-42.
47. Sillars, M. O. (1991). Messages, meanings, and culture: Approaches to communication criticism. New York: HarperCollins.
48. Sirridge, M. (1978). Artistic intention and critical prerogative. British Journal of Aesthetics, 18, 137-154.
49. Stern, J., & Stern, M. (1990). The encyclopedia of bad taste. New York: Harper and Row.
50. Twigg, R. (1992). Aestheticizing the home: Textual strategies of taste, self-identity, and bourgeois hegemony in America's “Gilded Age.” Text and Performance Quarterly, 12, 1-20.
51. Zarefsky, D. (1992). Spectator politics and the revival of public argument. Communication Monographs, 59, 411-414.