Sociocultural views of learning

The SAGE Handbook of Special Education

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 280-294

  de Valenzuela, J S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84950119495     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781848607989.n22     Document Type: Chapter

References (44)

1. Baca, L., and Lane, K.A dialogue on cultural implications for learning. Exceptional Children 40 (8) (1974). 552-563.
2. Bennett, K. P., and LeCompte, M. D.(1990). The way schools work: A sociological analysis of education. New York: Longman.
3. Bogdan, R., and Kugelmass, J.(1984). Case studies of mainstreaming: A symbolic interactionist approach to special schooling. In L.Barton, and S.Tomlinson (Eds.), Special education and social interests (pp. 173-191). New York: Nichols.
4. Bozhovich, L. I.The concept of cultural-historical development of the mind and its prospects. Soviet Psychology 16 (1) (1977). 5-22.
5. Chaiklin, S.(2003). The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky's analysis of learning and instruction. In A.Kozulin, B.Gindis, V. S.Ageyev, and S. M.Miller (Eds.), Vygotsky's educational theory in cultural context (pp. 39-64). New York: Cambridge University Press.
6. Cobb, P.Where is mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematical development. Educational Researcher 23 (7) (1994). 13-20.
7. Cobb, P.(2000). Constructivism. In Encyclopedia of psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 277-279). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
8. Cobb, P., and Yackel, E.Constructivist, emergent, and sociocultural perspectives in the context of developmental research. Educational Psychologist 31 (3/4) (1996). 175-190.
9. Cole, M.(1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
10. Cole, M., and Engeström, Y.(1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G.Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 1-46). New York: Cambridge University Press.
11. Davydov, V. D., and Zinchenko, V. P.Vygotsky's contribution to the development of psychology. Soviet Psychology 27 (2) (1989). 22-36.
12. Figueroa, R. A.(1999). Special education for Latino students in the United States: A metaphor for what is wrong. In T. V.Fletcher, and C. S.Bos (Eds.), Helping individuals with disabilities and their families: Mexican and U.S. perspectives (pp. 147-159). Tempe, AZ: Bilingual Review/Press.
13. Gillen, J.Versions of Vygotsky. British Journal of Educational Studies 48 (2) (2000). 183-198.
14. Goldenberg, C., and Patthey-Chavez, G.Discourse processes in instructional conversations: Interactions between teacher and transition readers. Discourse Processes 19 (1995). 57-73.
15. Griffin, P., and Mehan, H.(1981). Sense and ritual in classroom discourse. In F.Coulmas (Ed.), Conversational routine: Explorations in standardized communication situations and prepatterned speech (pp. 187-213). New York: Mouton.
16. John-Steiner, V., and Mahn, H.Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: A Vygotskian framework. Educational Psychologist 31 (3/4) (1996). 191-206.
17. Kinginger, C.Defining the zone of proximal development in US foreign language education. Applied Linguistics 23 (2) (2002). 240-261.
18. Kozulin, A.(1986). Vygotsky in context. In L. S.Vygotsky, Thought and language (A. Kozulin, Ed., and Trans.), (pp. xi-lvi). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Kozulin, A.(1990). Vygotsky's psychology: A biography of ideas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20. Lidz, C. S.Dynamic assessment and the legacy of L. S. Vygotsky. School Psychology International 16 (1995). 143-153.
21. Lidz, C. S., and Elliott, J. G. (Eds.). (2000). Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications. New York: Elsevier Science.
22. Mahn, H.Vygotsky's methodological contribution to sociocultural theory. Remedial and Special Education 20 (6) (1999). 341-350.
23. McLaren, P.(2003). Critical pedagogy: A look at the major concepts. In A.Darder, M.Baltodano, and R. D.Torres (Eds.), The critical pedagogy reader (pp. 69-96). New York: Taylor and Francis.
24. Ochs, E.(1986). Introduction. In B. B.Schieffelin, and E.Ochs (Eds.), Language socialization across cultures (pp. 1-13). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Peña, E. D.(1996). Dynamic assessment: The model and its language applications. In K. N.Cole, P. S.Dale, and D. J.Thal (Eds.), Assessment of communication and language (pp. 281-307). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
26. Radzikhovskii, L. A, and Khomskaya, E. D.A. R. Luria and L S. Vygotsky: Early years in their collaboration. Soviet Psychology 10 (1) (1981). 3-21.
27. Reiber, R. W., and Carton, A. S. (Eds.). (1987). The collected works of L S. Vygotsky (Vol. 1: Problems of general psychology). New York: Plenum Press.
28. Reiber, R. W., and Carton, A. S. (Eds.). (1993). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky (Vol. 2: The fundamentals of defectology). New York: Plenum Press.doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-2806-7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2806-7
29. Sawyer, R. K.Emergence in psychology: Lessons from the history of non-reductionist science. Human Development 45 (2002a). 2-28.
30. Sawyer, R. K.Unresolved tensions in sociocultural theory: Analogies with contemporary sociological debates. Culture and Psychology 8 (3) (2002b). 283-305.
31. Schieffelin, B. B., and Ochs, E. (Eds.). (1986). Language socialization across cultures. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
32. Stone, C. A.(1993). What is missing in the metaphor of scaffolding? In E. A.Forman, N.Minick, and C. A.Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children's development (pp. 169-183). New York: Oxford University Press.
33. Stone, C. A.The metaphor of scaffolding: Its utility for the field of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities 31 (4) (1998). 344-364.
34. Suina, J. H., and Smolkin, L B.(1994). From natal culture to school culture to dominant society culture: Supporting transitions for Pueblo Indian students. In P. M.Greenfield, and R. R.Cocking (Eds.), Cross-cultural roots of minority child development (pp. 115-130). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35. Tharp, R. G.(1997). From at-risk to excellence: Research, theory, and principles for practice (Research Report 1). Santa Cruz, CA: Center for Research on Education, Diversity and Excellence.
36. Tharp, R. G., and Gallimore, R.(1988). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning, and schooling in social context. New York: Cambridge University Press.
37. Trent, S. C, Artiles, A. J., and Englert, C. S.(1998). From deficit thinking to social constructivism: A review of theory, research, and practice in special education. In P. D.Pearson, and A.Cran-Nejad (Eds.), Review of research in education, #23 (Vol. 23, pp. 277-307). Washington, DC: AERA.
38. Van der Veer, R., and Valsiner, J.(1994). Introduction. In R.van der Veer, and J.Valsiner (Eds.), The Vygotsky reader (pp. 1-9). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
39. Vygotsky, L.(1962). Thought and language (E. Hanf-mann and G. Vakar, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40. Vygotsky, L. S.The development of higher psychological functions (M. Cole, Trans.). Soviet Psychology 15 (3) (1977). 60-73.
41. Vygotsky, L. S.(1978). Mind and society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V John-Steiner, S. Scribner, and E. Souberman, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42. Vygotsky, L. S.(1997). The collected works of L S. Vygotsky: The history of the development of higher mental functions (Vol. 4) (R. W. Rieber, Ed., M. J. Hall, Trans.). New York: Plenum Press.
43. Wertsch, J. V.(1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
44. Wertsch, J. V, and Tulviste, P.L. S. Vygotsky and contemporary developmental psychology. Developmental Psychology 28 (4) (1992). 548-557.