Closed-loop control of myoelectric prostheses with electrotactile feedback: Influence of stimulation artifact and blanking

IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 807-816

  Hartmann, Cornelia ^a   Došen, Strahinja ^a   Amsuess, Sebastian ^a   Farina, Dario ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Closed loop systems; Electrical stimulation; Feedback; Pattern recognition; Prosthetic hand

Indexed keywords

BENCHMARKING; BIOMEDICAL SIGNAL PROCESSING; CLOSED LOOP SYSTEMS; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FEEDBACK; FREQUENCY DOMAIN ANALYSIS; MUSCLE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PATTERN RECOGNITION SYSTEMS; SENSORY FEEDBACK;

CLASSIFICATION PERFORMANCE; ELECTRICAL STIMULATIONS; ELECTROCUTANEOUS STIMULATIONS; ELECTROMYOGRAPHIC SIGNAL; ELECTROTACTILE FEEDBACKS; EMG PATTERN CLASSIFICATION; PROSTHETIC HANDS; TIME AND FREQUENCY DOMAINS;

MYOELECTRICALLY CONTROLLED PROSTHETICS;

ADULT; ALGORITHM; ARTIFACT; AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; ELECTROTHERAPY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INNERVATION; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SENSORY FEEDBACK; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SKELETAL MUSCLE; TOUCH;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; ARTIFACTS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION THERAPY; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TOUCH;

EID: 84949991897     PISSN: 15344320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2014.2357175     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. C. Pylatiuk, S. Schulz, and L. Döderlein, "Results of an internet survey of myoelectric prosthetic hand users," Prosthet. Orthot. Int., vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 362-370, 2007.
2. C. Dietrich, K. Walter-Walsh, S. Preißler, G. O. Hofmann, O. W. Witte, W. H. Miltner, and T. Weiss, "Sensory feedback prosthesis reduces phantom limb pain: Proof of a principle," Neurosci. Lett. vol. 507, no. 2, pp. 97-100, 2012.
3. H. Flor, C. Denke, M. Schaefer, and S. Grüsser, "Effect of sensory discrimination training on cortical reorganisation and phantom limb pain," Lancet vol. 357, no. 9270, pp. 1763-1764, 2001.
4. C. Antfolk, M. D'Alonzo, B. Rosén, G. Lundborg, F. Sebelius, and C. Cipriani, "Sensory feedback in upper limb prosthetics.," Exp. Rev. Med. Devices, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 45-54, 2013.
5. G. Di Pino, A. Benvenuto, M. Tombini, G. Cavallo, L. Denaro, V. Denaro, F. Ferreri, L. Rossini, S. Micera, E. Guglielmelli, and P. M. Rossini, "Overview of the implant of intraneural multielectrodes in human for controlling a 5-fingered hand prosthesis, delivering sensorial feedback and producing rehabilitative neuroplasticity," in Proc. 4th IEEE RAS/EMBS Int. Conf. Biomed. Robot. Biomechatron., 2012, pp. 1831-1836.
6. A. Y. Szeto and F. A. Saunders, "Electrocutaneous stimulation for sensory communication in rehabilitation engineering," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., no. 4, pp. 300-308, Apr. 1982.
7. K. A. Kaczmarek, J. G. Webster, P. Bach-y Rita, and W. J. Tompkins, "Electrotactile and vibrotactile displays for sensory substitution systems," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 1-16, Jan. 1991.
8. P. E. Patterson and J. A. Katz, "Design and evaluation of a sensory feedback system that provides grasping pressure in a myoelectric hand," J. Rehabil. Res. Dev., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 1-8, 1992.
9. F. Mandrile, D. Farina, M. Pozzo, and R. Merletti, "Stimulation artifact in surface EMG signal: Effect of the stimulation waveform, detection system, current amplitude using hybrid stimulation technique," IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 407-415, Dec. 2003.
10. C. Almström, A. Anani, P. Herberts, and L. Körner, "Electrical stimulation and myoelectric control. A theoretical and applied study relelevant to prosthesis sensory feedback," Med. Biol. Eng. Comput., vol. 19, pp. 645-653, 1981.
11. H. Asanuma and I. Rosén, "Spread of mono- and polysynaptic connections within cat's motor cortex," Exp. Brain Res., vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 507-520, 1973.
12. C. Frigo, M. Ferrarin, W. Frasson, E. Pavan, and R. Thorsen, "EMG signals detection and processing for on-line control of functional electrical stimulation," J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol., vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 351-360, 2000.
13. X. Yi, J. Jia, S. Deng, S. Shen, Q. Xie, and G. Wang, "A blink restoration system with contralateral EMG triggered stimulation and real-time artifact blanking," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 140-148, Apr. 2013.
14. T. Keller and M. R. Popovic, "Real-time stimulation artifact removal in EMG signals for neuroprosthesis control applications," presented at the IFESS 2000 Conf., Cleveland, OH, 2001.
15. T. Schauer, R. C. Salbert, N.-O. Negård, and J. Raisch, "Detection and filtering of EMG for assessing voluntary muscle activity during FES," in Proc. 9th Annu. Conf. IFESS, Bournemouth, U.K., 2004, pp. 185-187.
16. A. Hernandez Arieta, H. Yokoi, T. Arai, and W. Yu, "Study on the effects of electrical stimulation on the pattern recognition for an EMG prosthetic application," in Proc. 27th Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc., 2005, pp. 6919-6922.
17. M. Asghari Oskoei and H. Hu, "Myoelectric control systems-A survey," Biomed. Signal Process., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 275-294, 2007.
18. K. Englehart and B. Hudgins, "A robust, real-time control scheme for multifunction myoelectric control," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 50, no. 7, pp. 848-854, Jul. 2003.
19. E. J. Scheme, K. B. Englehart, and B. S. Hudgins, "Selective classification for improved robustness of myoelectric control under nonideal conditions," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 1698-1705, Jun. 2011.
20. B. Peerdeman, D. Boere, H. Witteveen, H. Hermens, S. Stramigioli, J. Rietman, P. Veltink, and S. Misra et al., "Myoelectric forearm prostheses: State of the art from a user-centered perspective," J. Rehabil. Res. Develop., vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 719-737, 2011.
21. M. Zecca, S. Micera, M. Carrozza, and P. Dario, "Control of multifunctional prosthetic hands by processing the electromyographic signal," Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng., vol. 30, no. 4-6, pp. 459-485, 2002.
22. M. Zardoshti-Kermani, B. C. Wheeler, K. Badie, and R. M. Hashemi, "EMG feature evaluation for movement control of upper extremity prostheses," IEEE Trans. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 324-333, Dec. 1995.
23. A. V. Oppenheim, R. W. Schafer, and J. R. Buck, Discrete-Time Signal Processing. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1999, vol. 5.
24. M. Solomonow and J. Lyman, "Electrotactile stimulation relevant to sensory-motor rehabilitation: A progress report," Bull. Prosthet. Res., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 63-72, 1980.
25. L. H. Smith, L. J. Hargrove, B. A. Lock, and T. A. Kuiken, "Determining the optimal window length for pattern recognition-based myoelectric control: Balancing the competing effects of classification error and controller delay," IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 186-192, Apr. 2011.
26. L. Liu, P. Liu, E. Clancy, E. Scheme, and K. Englehart, "Whitening of the electromyogram for improved classification accuracy in prosthesis control," in Proc. 34th Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE EMBS, San Diego, CA, Aug. 2012, pp. 2627-2630.