NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND AND LATINO/A STUDENTS

The Praeger Handbook of Latino Education in the U.S.: [2 volumes]

Volumn 2, Issue , 2006, Pages 343-350

  Rivera, Rosita L ^a   Edmondson, Jacqueline ^b  

^a Pennsylvania State University ^*  (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84949982699     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (22)

1. Abedi, J. (2004). The No Child Left Behind Act and English Language Learners: Assessment and Accountability Issues. Educational Researcher 33(1), 4-14.
2. Carlson, K. (2004). Test scores by Race and Ethnicity. Phi Delta Kappan 85, 379.
3. Chute, E. (2003). School District Fights State; No Child Left Behind Sanctions Prompt Suit. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, December 17, B1.
4. Coeyman, M. (2003). Practical Skills vs. 3R’s: A Debate Revives. Christian Science Monitor, July 8. Available: http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/0708/p13s02-lepr.html (accessed February 26, 2005).
5. Darder, A., Torres, R. D., & Gutiérrez, H. (1997). Latinos and Education. New York: Routledge.
6. Foreign Language Annals. (2004). NCLB Leaves behind Liberal Arts, According to Study: Minority Students Most Affected by Curriculum Changes. Foreign Language Annals 37, 1.
7. Forrest, S. (2004). Implications of No Child Left Behind on Family Literacy in a Multicultural Community. The Clearing House 78(1), 41.
8. González, R., & Melis, I. (2000). Language Ideologies: Critical Perspectives on the Official English Movement. Urbana, IL: NCTE.
9. González, R. (2002). The No Child Left Behind Act: Implications for Local Educators and Advocates for Latino Students, Families, and Communities. Issues Brief. Washington, DC: National Council of La Raza.
10. Gutierrez, K. (2002). Rethinking Educational Policy for English Learners. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.
11. Hoff, D. (2004). Debate Grows on True Costs of School Law. Education Week 23(21), 1, 22.
12. Kohn, A. (2000). The Case Against Standardized Testing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
13. McNeil, L. (2000). Contradictions of School Reform: Educational Costs of Standardized Testing. New York: Routledge.
14. National Public Radio (NPR). (2002). Testing Our Schools. Frontline. PBS.
15. Orfield, G. (2004). Law Is Leaving Children-and Education Reform-Behind. Chicago Sun Tribune, April 19, 51.
16. Paul, D. (2004). The Train Has Left: The No Child Left Behind Act Leaves Black and Latino Literacy Learners Waiting at the Station. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy 47(8), 648-656.
17. Sacks, P. (1999). Standardized Minds: The High Price of America’s Testing Culture and What We Can Do to Change It. New York: Perseus.
18. Garcia, G. (2003). English Learners Reaching the Highest Level of English Literacy. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
19. González, R., & Melis, I. (2000). Language Ideologies: Critical Perspectives on the Official English Movement. Urbana, IL: NCTE.
20. Goodman, K., Shannon, P., Goodman, Y., & Rapoport, R. (2004). Saving Our Schools: The Case for Public Education Saying No to ‘‘No Child Left Behind.'' Berkeley, CA: RDR Books.
21. Sacks, P. (1999). Standardized Minds: The High Price of America's Testing Culture and What We Can Do to Change It. New York: Perseus.
22. Soto, L. (1996). Language, Culture, and Power: Bilingual Families and the Struggle for Quality Education. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.