Directional analysis of images with gabor wavelets

Brazilian Symposium of Computer Graphic and Image Processing

Volumn 2000-January, Issue , 2000, Pages 170-177

  Rangayyan, R M ^a   Ferrari, R J ^a,b   Desautels, J E L ^a,c   Frere A F ^b,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^c Alberta Cancer Board   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSIDADE DE MOGI DAS CRUZES   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); COMPUTER GRAPHICS; GABOR FILTERS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; WAVELET ANALYSIS;

DIRECTIONAL ANALYSIS; DIRECTIONAL COMPONENT; DIRECTIONAL ELEMENTS; MULTI RESOLUTION REPRESENTATION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS; QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL CLASSIFIER; WAVELET-BASED REPRESENTATION;

IMAGE PROCESSING;

EID: 84949982483     PISSN: 15301834     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/SIBGRA.2000.883910     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Campbell FW and Robson JG. Application of Fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings. Journal of Physiology, 197:551-566, 1968.
2. Marcelja S. Mathematical description of the response of simple cortical cells. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 70(11): 1297-1300, 1980.
3. Jones P and Palmer LA. An evaluation of the two-dimensional Gabor filter model of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 58(6): 1233-1258, 1987.
4. Daugman JG. Uncertainty relation for resolution in space, spatial frequency, and orientation optimized by two-dimensional visual cortical filters. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 2(7): 1160-1169, 1985.
5. Daugman JG. Complete discrete 2-D Gabor transforms by neural networks for image analysis and compression. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 36(7): 1169-1179, 1988.
6. Turner MR. Texture discrimination by Gabor functions. Biological Cybernetics, 55:71-82, 1986.
7. Malik J and Perona P. Preattentive texture discrimination with early vision mechanisms. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 7(2):923-932, 1990.
8. Jain AK and Farrokhnia F. Unsupervised texture segmentation using Gabor filters. Pattern Recognition, 24(12):1167-1186, 1991.
9. Dunn D, Higgins WE, and Wakeley J. Texture segmentation using 2-D Gabor elementary functions. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 16(2):130-149, 1994.
10. Rolston WA and Rangayyan RM. Directional analysis of images using multi-resolution Gabor filters. In Proceedings of International Conference on Robotics, Vision, and Parallel Processing for Industrial Vision, pages 307-312, Ipoh, Malasia, May 1994.
11. Bovik AC, Clark M, and Geisler WS. Multichannel texture analysis using localized spatial filters. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 12(1):55-73, 1990.
12. Manjunath BS and Ma WY. Texture features for browsing and retrieval of image data. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 18(8):837-842, 1996.
13. Jähne B. Digital Image Processing. Springer, San Diego, CA, 4th edition, 1997.
14. Gonzalez RC and Woods RE. Digital Image Processing. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1992.
15. Otsu N. A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-9(1):62-66, 1979.
16. Homer MJ. Mammographic Interpretation: A Practical Approach. McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA, 1997.
17. Miller P and Astley S. Automated detection of mammographic asymmetry using anatomical features. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 7(6): 1461-1476, 1993.
18. Lau TK and Bischof WF. Automated detection of breast tumors using the asymmetry approach. Computers and Biomedical Research, 24:273-295, 1991.
19. Yin FF, Giger ML, Doi K, Vyborny CJ, and Schmidt RA. Computerized detection of masses in digital mammograms: automated alignment of breast images and its effect on bilateral-subtraction technique. Medical Physics, 21(3):445-452, 1994.
20. Vujovic N and Brzakovic D. Establishing the correspondence between control points in pairs of mammographie images. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 6(10):1388-1399, 1997.
21. Karssemeijer N and te Brake G. Combining single view features and asymmetry for detection of mass lesions. In Karssemeijer N, Thijssen M, Hendriks J, and van Erning L, editors, Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Digital Mammography, pages 95-102, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, June 1998.
22. Suckling J, Parker J, Dance DR, Astley S, Hutt I, Boggis CRM, Ricketts I, Stamatakis E, Cerneaz N, Kok SL, Taylor P, Betal D, and Savage J. The Mammographie Image Analysis Society digital mammogram database. In Gale AG, Astley SM, Dance DR, and Cairns AY, editors, Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Digital Mammography, pages 375-378, London, England, July 1994.
23. Caulkin S, Astley S, Asquith J, and Boggis C. Sites of occurrence of malignancies in mammograms. In Karssemeijer N, Thijssen M, Hendriks J, and van Erning L, editors, Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Digital Mammography, pages 279-282, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, June 1998.
24. Ferrari RJ, Rangayyan RM, Desautels JEL, and Frère AF. Segmentation of mammograms: Identification of the skin-air boundary, pectoral muscle, and fibroglandular disc. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Digital Mammography, page in press, Toronto, Canada, June 2000.
25. Duda RO and Hart PE. Pattern Classification and Scene Analysis. Wiley, New York, NY, 1973.