Making a method work for a project situation in the context of CMM

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2559, Issue , 2002, Pages 158-171

  Aydin, Mehmet N ^a   Harmsen, Frank ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^b IT Process Consulting Group   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER SCIENCE; COMPUTERS;

BEST PRACTICES; HARD CONSTRAINTS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT; KEY PROCESS AREAS; METHOD ENGINEERING; NEW APPLICATIONS; SOFTWARE PRODUCTS; SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT;

PROCESS ENGINEERING;

EID: 84949979285     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-36209-6_15     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Althoff, K. –D. Birk, A. Greese von Wangenheim, C. Tautz C.: Case-Based Reasoning for Experimental Software Engineering. In: M. Lenz, B. Bartch-Sporl, H.-D. Burkhard, S. Wess. (eds.), Case-Based Reasoning Technology, Springer Verlag, (1998) 235-254
2. Barki, H. Rivard, S. Talbot, J.: Toward an Assessment of Software Development Risk. Journal of MIS, 10(2), Fall, (1993) 203-225
3. Basili, V. R. Caldiera, G. Rombach, H. D.: Experience Factory. In J.J. Marciniak (ed.): Encyclopedia of Software Engineering, Volume 1, John Wiley & Sons (1994).
4. Boehm, B: Making RAD Work for Your Project, IEEE Computer, March, pp. 113-117(1999)
5. Brinkkemper, S.: Method Engineering: Engineering of Information Systems Development Methods and Tools. Information and Software Technology, 38, (1996) 275-280
6. DSDM Dynamic Systems Development Method Manual: Version 3, http://www.dsdm.org (1997)
7. Harmsen, F. Brinkkemper, S. Oei, H.: Situational Method Engineering for Information Systems Project. In: Olle, T. W. Stuarts, A.A. V. (eds.): Methods and Associated Tools for the Information Systems Life Cycle, Proceedings of the IFIP WG 8.1, Int. Conference CRIS’94, Amsterdam, North-Holland, (1994) 169-194
8. Harmsen, F. Lubbers, I. Wijers, G.: Success-Driven Selection of Fragments for Situational Methods: The S3 Model. In: Pohl, K. and P. Peters (eds.): Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Requirements Engineering: Foundations of Software Quality, Aachener Beitrage zur Informatik, Band 13, (1995) 104-115
9. Henninger, S. and Baumgarten, K. A.: Case-Based Approach to Tailoring Software Processes. In: Aha, D.W. Watson, I. Yang, Q. (eds.): Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning, ICCBR-2001. Vancouver, Canada, 30 July - 2 August 2001. Springer, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence
10. Hidding, G. J.: Reinventing Methodology. Communications of the ACM, Vol. 40, No.11, November (1997)
11. Hoef, R, van de Harmsen, F, Wijers, G.: Situation, Scenario, and Success. Memoranda Informatica 95-12, University of Twente, Enschede (1995)
12. Jarke, M. Pohl, K. Rolland, C. Schmitt, J. R.: Experience-Based Method Evaluation and Improvement: A process modeling approach. Proceedings of the Int. IFIP WG 8.1 Conf. In CRIS Series: Method and Associated Tools for the Information Systems Life Cycle, North Holland (1994)
13. Jiang, J. J. Klein, G. Discenza, R: Information Systems Success as Impacted by Risks and Development Strategies. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol.48, No.1, February (2001)
14. Kettinger, W. J. Teng, J. T. C. Quha, S.: Business Process Change: A Study of Methodologies, Techniques, and Tools, MIS Quarterly, March (1997)
15. Klooster, M, Brinkkemper, S, Harmsen, F. and Wijers, G.: Intranet Facilitated Knowledge Management: A Theory and Tool for Defining Situational Methods In: Olivé, A. Pastor, J.A.: Advanced Information Systems Engineering. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference CAiSE'97, Barcelona, Spain, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1250, pp. 303-317, Springer Verlag (1997).
16. Kumar, K. Welke, R. J.: Methodology Engineering: A Proposal for Situation-Specific Methodology Construction. In: Cotterman, W.W. Senn, J. A. (ed.): Challenges and Strategies for Research in Systems Development, Wiley& Sons Ltd (1992).
17. Martin, J.: Rapid Application Development. Macmillan Publishing, New York (1991)
18. Paulk, M. C. Weber, C. V. Curtis, B, Chrissis, M. B. (eds): The Capability Maturity Model: Guidelines for Improving the Software Process. SEI Series in Software Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Addison-Wesley (1994)
19. Rolland, C. Prakash, N. A proposal for context-specific method engineering, In: Brinkkemper, S. Lyytinen, K. and Welke, R. W. (eds.): Method Engineering: Principles of Method Construction and Tool Support. Proceedings of the IFIP WG 8.1, Atlanta, Chapman & Hall, ISBN 0-412-79750-X (1996)
20. Schmidt, R. Lyytinen, K. Keil, M. Cule, P.: Identifying Software Project Risks: An International Delphi Study. Journal of MIS, Spring, Vol.17, No.4, (2001) 5-36
21. Slooten, C. Brinkkemper, S. A Method Engineering Approach to Information Systems Development. In: Prakash, N. C. Rolland, C. Pernici,B. (eds.): Information System Development Process. Proceedings of the IFIP WG 8.1, Como, pp.167-186, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. North Holland, ISBN 0-444-81594-5 (1993)
22. Slooten, C., Hodes, B.: Characterizing IS Development Projects. In: Brinkkemper, S. Lyytinen, K. and Welke, R. W. (eds.): Method Engineering: Principles of Method Construction and Tool Support. Proceedings of the IFIP WG 8.1, Atlanta, Chapman & Hall, ISBN 0-412-79750-X (1996)
23. Stapleton, J.: Dynamic Systems Development Method – The Method in Practice. Addison-Wesley, 1997.
24. Tolvanen, J.-P.: Incremental Method Engineering with Modeling Tools: Theoretical Principles and Empirical Evidence, Dissertation, University of Jyväskylä, Finland, ISBN 951-39-0303-6 (1998)