Assessment of user-centred design processes–lessons learnt and conclusions

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2559, Issue , 2002, Pages 232-246

  Jokela, Timo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROCESS ENGINEERING;

ASSESSMENT APPROACHES; INDUSTRIAL SETTINGS; PROCESS ASSESSMENTS; PROCESS CAPABILITIES; PROCESS IMPROVEMENT; PROCESS PERFORMANCE; QUALITATIVE FEEDBACK; RESEARCH STRATEGY;

USER CENTERED DESIGN;

EID: 84949972266     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-36209-6_21     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. [1] ISO/IEC, 13407 Human-Centred Design Processes for Interactive Systems. 1999: ISO/IEC 13407: 1999 (E).
2. [2] Nielsen, J., Usability Engineering. 1993, San Diego: Academic Press, Inc. 358.
3. [3] Hix and Hartson, Developing User Interfaces: Ensuring Usability Through Product & Process. 1993: John Wiley & Sons. 416.
4. [4] Beyer, H. and K. Holtzblatt, Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems. 1998, San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers. 472.
5. [5] Mayhew, D.J., The Usability Engineering Lifecycle. 1999, San Fancisco: Morgan Kaufman.
6. [6] Rosenbaum, S., J.A. Rohn, and J. Humburg. A Toolkit for Strategic Usability: Results from Workshops, Panels, and Surveys. in CHI 2000 Conference Proceedings. 2000. The Hague: ACM, New York.
7. [7] Bloomer, S. and S. Wolf. Successful Strategies for Selling Usability into Organizations. Tutorial 8. in CHI 99. 1999. Pittsburgh, USA.
8. [8] Rosenbaum, S., J. Rohn, J. Humburg, S. Bloomer, K. Dye, J. Nielsen, D. Rinehart, and D. Wixon. What Makes Strategic Usability Fail? Lessons Learned from the Field. A panel. in CHI 99 Extended Abstracts. 1999. Pittsburgh, USA: ACM, New York.
9. [9] Anderson, R., Organisational Limits to HCI. Interview session. Conversations with Don Norman and Janice Rohn. Interactions, 2000. 7(2): p. 36-60.
10. [10] Bevan, N. and J. Earthy. Usability process improvement and maturity assessment. in IHM-HCI 2001. 2001. Lille, France: Cépaduès-Editions, Toulouse.
11. [11] Paulk, M., C. Weber, S. Carcia, M. Chrissis, and M. Bush, The Capability Maturity Model: Guidelines for Improving the Software Process. 1995: Addison-Wesley.
12. [12] Kuvaja, P., J. Similä, L. Kranik, A. Bicego, S. Saukkonen, and G. Koch, Software Process Assessment and Improvement - The BOOTSTRAP Approach. 1994, Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
13. [13] ISO/IEC, 15504-2 Software Process Assessment - Part 2: A reference model for processes and process capability. 1998: ISO/IEC TR 15504-2: 1998 (E).
14. [14] Jokela, T. Usability Capability Models - Review and Analysis. in People and Computers XIV - Usability or Else! Proceedings of HCI 2000. 2000. Sunderland, UK: Springer, London.
15. [15] ISO/IEC, 18529 Human-centred Lifecycle Process Descriptions. 2000: ISO/IEC TR 18529: 2000 (E).
16. [16] Jokela, T., N. Iivari, M. Nieminen, and K. Nevakivi. Developing A Usability Capability Assessment Approach through Experiments in Industrial Settings. In Joint Proceedings of HCI 2001 and IHM 2001. 2001: Springer, London.
17. [17] Jokela, T. An Assessment Approach for User-Centred Design Processes. In Proceedings of EuroSPI 2001. 2001. Limerick: Limerick Institute of Technology Press.
18. [18] Jokela, T., Assessment of user-centred design processes as a basis for improvement action. An experimental study in industrial settings. Acta Universitatis Ouluensis, ed. J. Jokisaari. 2001, Oulu: Oulu University Press. 168.
19. [19] Jokela, T. Making User-Centred Design Common Sense: Striving for An Unambiguous and Communicative UCD Process Model. in NordiCHI 2002. 2002. Aarhus, Denmark.
20. [20] ISO/TR15504-3, Software process assessment - Part 3: Performing an assessment. 1998, International Organization for Standardization, Genève, Switzerland.
21. [21] ISO/TR15504-4, Software process assessment - Part 4: Guide to performing assessments. 1998, International Organization for Standardization, Genève, Switzerland.
22. [22] March, S.T. and G.F. Smith, Design and Natural Science Research on Information Technology. Decision Support Systems, 1995. 15(4): p. 251-266.
23. SPICE, SPICE Phase 2 Trials Interim Report, Version 1.00. 1998, Available at http://www-sqi.cit.gu.edu.au/spice/. p. 172.