Determination of co-combustion properties and thermal kinetics of poultry litter/coal blends using thermogravimetry

Renewable Energy

Volumn 89, Issue , 2016, Pages 215-223

  Yurdakul, Sema ^a  

^a SULEYMAN DEMIREL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Activation energy; Biomass; Co combustion; Poultry litter; Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA)

Indexed keywords

ACTIVATION ANALYSIS; BIOMASS; CHEMICAL ACTIVATION; COAL; COAL COMBUSTION; COMBUSTION; DECOMPOSITION; THERMOGRAVIMETRIC ANALYSIS;

COCOMBUSTION; COMBUSTION PROPERTY; DECOMPOSITION PROPERTY; FLYNN-WALL-OZAWA; NON-ISOTHERMAL CONDITION; POULTRY LITTER; SYNERGISTIC EFFECT; THERMOGRAVIMETRIC ANALYZERS;

ACTIVATION ENERGY;

ACTIVATION ENERGY; BIOMASS; COMBUSTION; LIGNITE; LITTER; POULTRY; THERMODYNAMICS; THERMOGRAVIMETRY;

EID: 84949947873     PISSN: 09601481     EISSN: 18790682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2015.12.034     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. TUIK Statistics of Animal Products 2013, accessed on October 2015. http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=16183.
2. Inal A, Sözüdogru Ü, Erden D, Tavuk gübresinin icerigi ve enerji degeri. Tarim. Bilim D. 1996; 2(3):45-50.
3. Kim S.S., Agblevor F.A., Lim J. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2009, 15:247-252.
4. Font-Palma C. Characterization, kinetics and modelling of gasification of poultry manure and litter: An overview. Energy Convers. Manag. 2012, 53:92-98.
5. Mante O.D., Agblevor F.A. Influence of pine wood shavings on the pyrolysis of poultry litter. Waste Manag. 2010, 30:2537-2547.
6. Scotland R. The Recycling of waste wood by thermal conversion, A Report to identify the feasibility of utilizing waste wood as a feedstock for use in Bioenergy Technologies, Glasgow. Int. J. Emerg. Tech. Adv. Eng. 2003, 3(3):131-138.
7. Henihan A.M., Leahy M.J., Leahy J.J., Cummins E., Kelleher B.P. Emissions modeling of fluidized bed co-combustion of poultry litter and peat. Bioresour. Technol. 2003, 87:289-294.
8. Vamvuka D., Sfakiotakis S., Panopoulos K.D. An experimental study on the thermal valorization of municipal and animal wastes. Int. J. Energy Environ. 2013, 4(2):191-198.
9. Kirubakaran V., Sivaramakrishnan V., Premalatha M., Subramanian P. Kinetics of Auto-Gasification of Poultry Litter. Int. J. Green Energy 2007, 4:519-534.
10. Tunc M., Camdali Ü., Parmaksizoglu C. Comparison of Turkey's electrical energy consumption and production with some European countries and optimization of future electrical power supply investments in Turkey. Energy Policy 2006, 34:50-59.
11. Kelleher B.P., Leahy J.J., Henihan A.M., O'Dwyer T.F., Sutton D., Leahy M.J. Advances in poultry litter disposal technology- a review. Bioresour. Technol. 2002, 83:27-36.
12. Abelha P., Gulyurtlu I., Boavida D., Barros J.S., Cabrita I., Leahy J., Kelleher B., Leahy M. Combustion of poultry litter in a fluidised bed combustor. Fuel 2003, 82:687-692.
13. Yao F., Wu Q., Lei Y., Guo Y., Xu Y. Thermal decomposition kinetics of natural fibers: Activation energy with dynamic thermogravimetric analysis. Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 2008, 93:90-98.
14. Popescu C. Integral method to analyze the kinetics of heterogeneous reactions under non-isothermal conditions A variant on the Ozawa-Flynn-Wall method. Themochim. Acta 1996, 285(2):309-323.
15. Zelic J., Ugrina L., Jozic D. Application of thermal methods in the chemistry of cement: Kinetic analysis of portlandite from non-isothermal thermogravimetric data. The First International Proficiency Testing Conference. Sinaia, Romania October 2007, 11-13.
16. Liu Z., Jiang Z., Fei B., Liu X. Thermal decomposition of fir. Bioresources 2013, 8(4):5014-5024.
17. Whitely N., Ozao R., Artiaga R., Cao Y., Pan W.P. Multi-utilization of Chicken Litter as Biomass Source. Part I. Combust. Energy Fuel 2006, 20:2660-2665.
18. Joseph P., Tretsiakova-McNally S., McKenna S. Characterization of cellulosic wastes and gasification products from chicken farms. Waste Manag. 2012, 32:701-709.
19. Sun R.C. Detoxification and separation of lignocellulosic biomass prior to fermentation for bioethanol production by removal of lignin and hemicelluloses. Bioresourcs 2008, 4(2):452-455.
20. Schniewind A.P. Concise Encyclopedia of Wood and Wood-based Materials 1989, Pergemon Press, Oxford.
21. Yang H., Han R., Chen H., Lee D.H., Zheng C. Characteristics of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin pyrolysis. Fuel 2007, 86(12-13):1781-1788.
22. Xu Y., Chen B. Investigation of thermodynamic parameters in the pyrolysis conversion of biomass and manure to biochars using thermogravimetric analysis. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 146:485-493.
23. Li S., Whitely N., Xu W., Pan W.P. Characterization of Coal by Thermal Analysis Methods, Thermal analysis. Fundamentals and Applications to Material Characterization 2005, 111-120. Universidade da Coruña, Servicio de Publicaciones. D.A. Ramon (Ed.).
24. Di Nola G., Jong W., Spliethoff H. TG-FTIR characterization of coal and biomass single fuels and blends under slow heating rate conditions: Partitioning of the fuel-bound nitrogen. Fuel Process Technol. 2010, 91(1):103-115.
25. Yorulmaz S.Y., Atimtay A. Investigation of combustion kinetics of treated and untreated waste wood samples with thermogravimetric analysis. Fuel Process Technol. 2009, 90:939-946.
26. Marinov S.P., Gonsalvesh L., Stefanova M., Yperman J., Carleer R., Reggers G., Yürüm Y., Groudeva V., Gadjanov P. Combustion behaviour of some biodesulphurized coals assessed by TGA/DTA. Thermochim. Acta 2010, 497(1-2):46-51.
27. Park D.K., Kim S.D., Lee S.H., Lee J.G. Co-pyrolysis characteristics of sawdust and coal blend in TGA and a fixed bed reactor. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:6151-6156.
28. Acma H.H., Yaman S. Interaction between biomass and different rank coals during co-pyrolysis. Renew. Energy 2010, 35:288-292.
29. Shawalliah I.S., Norazah A.R., Khudzir I. Combustion characteristics of Malaysian oil palm biomass, sub-bituminous coal and their respective blends via thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 123:581-591.
30. Sahu S.G., Sarkar P., Mukherjee A., Adak A.K., Chakraborty N. Studies on the co-combustion behavior of coal/biomass blends using thermogravimetric analysis. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Adv. Eng. 2013, 3(3):126-130.
31. Kok M.V., Özgür E. Thermal analysis and kinetics of biomass samples. Fuel Process Technol. 2013, 106:739-743.
32. Acma H.H., Yaman S., Kucukbayrak S. Effect of heating rate on the pyrolysis yields of rapeseed. Renew. Energ 2006, 31(6):803-810.
33. Kocabas-Atakli Z.Ö, Okyay-Öner F., Yürüm Y. Combustion characteristics of Turkish hazelnut shell biomass, lignite coal and their respective blends via thermogravimetric analysis. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2015, 119(3):1723-1729.
34. Pintana P., Tippayawong N. Nonisothermal Thermogravimetric Analysis of Thai Lignite with High CaO Content. Sci. World J. 2013, 10.1155/2013/216975.
35. Vhathvarothai N., Ness J., Yu J. An investigation of thermal behavior of biomass and coal during co-combustion using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). Int. J. Energy Res. 2013, 38:804-812.
36. Chatphol M., Behdad M. Lack of synergetic effects in the pyrolytic characteristics of woody biomass/coal blends under low and high heating rate regimes. Biomass Bioenergy 2002, 23:55-66.
37. Toptas A., Yildirim Y., Duman G., Yanik J. Combustion behavior of different kinds of torrefied biomass and their blends with lignite. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 177:328-336. 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.11.072.
38. Shafizadeh F. The chemistry of pyrolysis and combustion. The chemistry of solid wood. Advances in Chemistry Series 1984, 489-529. American Chemical Society, Washington DC. R.M. Rowell (Ed.).
39. Lowden L.A., Hull T.R. Review: flammability behaviour of wood and a review of the methods for its reduction. Fire Sci. Rev. 2013, 2:4.
40. Rowell R.M., Dietenberger M.A. Thermal properties, combustion and fire retardancy of wood. Handbook of Wood Chemistry and Wood Composites 2013, 146-148. Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton. second ed. R.M. Rowell (Ed.).
41. Kastanaki E., Vamvuka D. A comparative reactivity and kinetic study on the combustion of coal-biomass char blends. Fuel 2006, 85:1186-1193.